Cannabis News Students for Sensible Drug Policy
  Senators' Misplaced Priorities
Posted by CN Staff on May 21, 2002 at 11:01:49 PT
By Colin Mangham, Vancouver Sun  
Source: Vancouver Sun  

cannabis Much ado has been made about the report of the Senate committee on illegal drugs, which recently met in Richmond, recommending the decriminalization of marijuana. This is not surprising, since this was the conclusion the committee drew even before it even began, as intoned in its mission statement.

As a parent, taxpayer and one who provided expert testimony before this committee, I am appalled that its members selectively ignored testimony they did not agree with, solicited testimony supportive of their bias and failed to actively seek testimony from an array of researchers and experts who would have categorically and scientifically damned the idea.

The truth is, marijuana is an addictive drug, capable of inflicting significant physical, emotional and social harm.

There is no war on drugs in Canada, as the committee claims, nor are Canadians being charged now for using marijuana unless they have also committed other crimes. At present, the law plays the role of a moral deterrent, hence the use of marijuana is but a fraction of that of alcohol and tobacco, which are legal. Fewer than 10 per cent of Canadians used marijuana in the past year.

But perhaps the most troubling thing to me is that energy and tax dollars should be spent on the question of whether to make it easier for Canadians, especially young Canadians, to get intoxicated on a drug.

Am I alone in thinking it is sad indeed that this represents the low level of respect and hope senators have for our children and youth? Is this the best thing they can spend time on? When Canada faces such huge challenges, why would we even be thinking about spending time trying to make it easier to use dope?

I wonder where are the Senate proposals fostering youth achievement, youth employment, appreciation for youth or how to help a young generation avoid drugs in the first place?

Canadians should "just say no" and rebuke the committee for such an insult to our youth, and for such a use of precious dollars.

Colin Mangham

Director, Prevention Source B.C.

Source: Vancouver Sun
Author: Colin Mangham, Vancouver Sun
Published: Tuesday, May 21, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Vancouver Sun
Contact: sunletters@pacpress.southam.ca
Website: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Canadian Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/can.htm

Redefining a Crime
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12743.shtml

Canada: The Debate Over Decriminalization
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12697.shtml

Should We Treat Pot Like Tobacco? Senators Ask
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12696.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #11 posted by Sam Adams on May 21, 2002 at 12:06:56 PT
Hey pal,
I'm NOT a parent, and I DON'T want my tax dollars paying cops to arrest YOUR kids because you failed in raising them! Should we have the cops provide the "moral deterrent" to your kids swearing, messing up their rooms, eating unhealthy foods, and failing school?

Where did this stat come from?

"Fewer than 10 per cent of Canadians used marijuana in the past year."

I'll bet 10 percent of Canadians have smoked in the last HOUR!

I love the part about not charging people with MJ unless they've committed other crimes...if they've committed other crimes, then they're already being arrested and charged for those crimes! Creepy shades of the past in this line of logic...just imagine Germany - only Jews who commit other crimes will be arrested! only Jews who are not in the (fill in political affiliation here) Party will be arrested! Only blacks who have the gall to look at white women will be lynched!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by Sam Adams on May 21, 2002 at 12:06:55 PT
Hey pal,
I'm NOT a parent, and I DON'T want my tax dollars paying cops to arrest YOUR kids because you failed in raising them! Should we have the cops provide the "moral deterrent" to your kids swearing, messing up their rooms, eating unhealthy foods, and failing school?

Where did this stat come from?

"Fewer than 10 per cent of Canadians used marijuana in the past year."

I'll bet 10 percent of Canadians have smoked in the last HOUR!

I love the part about not charging people with MJ unless they've committed other crimes...if they've committed other crimes, then they're already being arrested and charged for those crimes! Creepy shades of the past in this line of logic...just imagine Germany - only Jews who commit other crimes will be arrested! only Jews who are not in the (fill in political affiliation here) Party will be arrested! Only blacks who have the gall to look at white women will be lynched!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by bongathon on May 21, 2002 at 12:06:14 PT:

what money?
jail bombers not bongers

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by FoM on May 21, 2002 at 12:04:39 PT
el_toonces and Everyone!
I just got off the phone after major run arounds ( I hate to have to get pushy but I did ) they will be hooking up my satellite on Thursday morning. I am really anxious and hope it goes ok.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by el_toonces on May 21, 2002 at 11:57:29 PT:

Isn't Emily Murphy Dead?
At least I thought so, but apparently her control-freak, temperance, Bible thumping, sanctimonious, prohibition filled spirit lives on........

I thought Canadians weren't as hung up on these issues as some of the more freaky folks here in the States?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on May 21, 2002 at 11:47:21 PT
Just a Note
This was a very popular article.

US Backlash Against Ganja http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10640.shtml

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by Lehder on May 21, 2002 at 11:36:21 PT
from Nuevo's link
Countries which do not receive certification and those that are decertified lose most of their foreign assistance from the United States, and the US is required to vote against any assistance to that country from major multilateral lending agencies, including the World Bank, the Inter-American Development bank and the IMF.

The economically destabilizing effects of these organizations on dozens of countries suggest "decertification" as probably the wisest course.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Nuevo Mexican on May 21, 2002 at 11:22:53 PT
America puts it boot in mouth in Jamaica...
This just in: US backlash against ganja - Embassy official warns of decertification for Jamaica

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20010817/lead/lead1.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by SoberStoner on May 21, 2002 at 11:22:01 PT:

Uhhhh
I could actualy FEEL my IQ getting lower as i read this...excuse while i pack a bowl to regain some of those points back.

SS

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by WolfgangWylde on May 21, 2002 at 11:17:09 PT
More like Self-Righteious Idiocy...
Never let it be said that Prohibitionists are the type to let truth stand in the way of a good argument. Still, it is downright fun to watch the lil' piggies squeal, isn't it?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by p4me on May 21, 2002 at 11:09:09 PT
Is this righteous indignation?
You have to be right to have righteous indignation? The truth is, marijuana is an addictive drug, capable of inflicting significant physical, emotional and social harm

ICBS

VAAI,POW

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on May 21, 2002 at 11:01:49