Cannabis News Media Awareness Project
  Pot Shots
Posted by CN Staff on May 03, 2002 at 16:49:14 PT
By Jacob Sullum 
Source: Reason Magazine 

medical "After years of giggling at quaintly outdated marijuana scare stories like the 1936 movie 'Reefer Madness,' " writes drug czar John P. Walters in a recent Washington Post op-ed piece, "we've become almost conditioned to think that any warnings about the true dangers of marijuana are overblown."

Walters thus concedes that people like him have been lying to the public about marijuana for at least 66 years. But finally, he seems to be saying, the government is telling the truth. Walters does not get far before he reneges on that implicit promise.

The drug czar claims "drug use among our nation's teens remains at near-record levels, with some 49 percent of high school seniors experimenting with marijuana at least once prior to graduation -- and 22 percent smoking marijuana at least once a month." Actually, the latter figure refers to use in the previous month, not "at least once a month," and these numbers peaked at 60 percent and 37 percent, respectively, in 1979.

Walters says marijuana is "10 to 20 times stronger" today than it used to be. As the sociologist Lynn Zimmer and the pharmacologist John P. Morgan explain in Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts, claims like these are based on a spurious comparison with small samples of low-grade Mexican marijuana seized in the early '70s. These samples were not representative of the marijuana available at the time, and it appears that they decayed before they were tested. Even if average potency were somewhat higher today, that would be a health advantage, since users could smoke less to achieve the same effect.

"Each year," Walters asserts, "marijuana use is linked to tens of thousands of serious traffic accidents." Linked is a slippery word. The fact that traces of marijuana are found in a driver's blood does not mean he was under the influence at the time of the accident or that marijuana contributed to the crash. In a 1992 analysis of accidents in which the drivers were killed, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported: "The THC-only drivers had a responsibility rate below that of the drug-free drivers... While the difference was not statistically significant, there was no indication that cannabis by itself was a cause of fatal crashes."

To support his contention that marijuana "is in fact addictive" (whatever that means), Walters reports that two-thirds of the "4.3 million Americans who meet the diagnostic criteria for needing drug treatment... are dependent on marijuana." Since Walters conveniently leaves out alcohol, and since marijuana is by far the most popular illegal drug, its predominance among people with drug problems is hardly surprising. A more relevant question is what percentage of marijuana users get into trouble with the drug. A 1994 study based on data from the National Comorbidity Survey estimated that 9 percent of marijuana users have ever met the American Psychiatric Association's criteria for "substance dependence." The comparable figure for alcohol was 15 percent.

Walters says claims about marijuana's medical utility are "based on pseudo-science." Apparently he has not seen the National Academy of Sciences report that discusses the evidence at length. He should check it out. It was commissioned by his predecessor.

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor of Reason.

Source: Reason Magazine (US)
Author: Jacob Sullum
Published: May 3, 2002
Copyright: 2002 The Reason Foundation
Contact: letters@reason.com
Website: http://www.reason.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts
http://www.marijuanafacts.org/

Bennett: Today's Pot is More Dangerous
http://freedomtoexhale.com/wb.htm

The Myth of 'Harmless' Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12683.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #4 posted by WolfgangWylde on May 05, 2002 at 10:50:40 PT
"Yes, Folks, We Have Been Lying To You...
...but, hey you can trust us now".

Somebody should point out to Walters that those "quaintly outdated marijuana scare stories" were the only reason that marijuana was outlawed in the first place. But NOW we're supposed to believe what they say. What a crock.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by goneposthole on May 03, 2002 at 18:03:41 PT
Legalize for a reason
I have never been in a car accident that involved the use of cannabis. I have been in two accidents where people had been drinking. I have seen plenty of accidents where drinking was the cause. In one of those accidents, a friend died.

If cannabis were legalized now, the economy would improve. People would be happy, too.

As it is now, it is a mess and will continue to be so until an end to the maddness comes.

Re-legalize for everyone's benefit. It is easy to do. Now is the time.

Everyone must be gearing up for the Million Marijuana March. 5/4/20-02

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by TroutMask on May 03, 2002 at 18:02:20 PT
The Truth
Ah, finally I see how it works.

If the Office of National Drug Control(?) Policy needs money, we're LOSING the War on Drugs. If we need to defeat the anti-prohibitionists, we're WINNING the War on Drugs (so there's no reason to stop now).

Now it all makes sense to me...not.

mmmmmm, sense.....

-TM

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on May 03, 2002 at 16:57:31 PT
Just a Note
Hi Everyone,

There have been many good news articles over the last couple of days and I know that some might have moved off the front page before they could be read. Here are two links and each link has 30 articles starting with the current one from Reason Magazine. I hope this helps everyone catch up if you are behind on your reading.

http://www.cannabisnews.com/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/cnews/newsread.pl?12724

http://www.cannabisnews.com/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/cnews/newsread.pl?12694

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on May 03, 2002 at 16:49:14