Cannabis News Stop the Drug War!
  Bust Once Again Shows the Futility of Drug War
Posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 12:30:57 PT
By Bill McClellan 
Source: Post-Dispatch  

justice Another drug bust went bad Friday afternoon. Two undercover cops approached a suspect sitting in his car outside an apartment complex in St. Ann. In an effort to escape, he ran into one of the cops. In turn, the suspect was shot several times. Happily, neither the officer nor the suspect died.

That evening, I was talking to a man who recently retired after a long career in law enforcement. "I think we ought to give up," he said. "We're not getting control of the situation. All we're doing is putting these young officers in harm's way."

Give up? Just let people ruin their lives?

What a good idea. As regular readers know, I have long argued that our war on drugs is a failed idea. Try as we might, we can't stop people from using drugs. By making drugs illegal, we just drive the price up, and make sure that the criminal element is in charge.

We've tried just about everything. The problem is at the top? Let's get Pablo Escobar. We did. The problem didn't go away. The problem is in the distribution system? I remember when we busted the Moorish Science Temple. The feds said that the Moors just about controlled the cocaine trade in this city. The feds were probably right, but busting the Moors didn't even slow things down. There's too much money involved. There are too many people ready to step forward.

Wait a minute. Why don't we put all the users in prison?

There seems to be two problems with that. In the first place, it's awfully expensive. Secondly, we are them. If not you, probably your friends and relatives. I remember when John Ashcroft's nephews were busted for pot. For that matter, Ashcroft's drug czar turned out to be a drug user. If it can happen in Ashcroft's circles, who is immune? For that matter, I remember when John McCain's wife fessed up to a drug problem. And these are Republicans!

I've long believed that the most cost-effective way to handle the drug problem is to give the worst drugs away. We take a product that should cost just a couple of bucks, and we make it illegal. Consequently, everybody who handles it up and down the long distribution line has to be paid commensurate with the risk of going to jail. It's as if we made corn illegal, and drove the price of an ear to $20. In the end, the junkie has to break into your house and steal $200 worth of stuff that he can then sell for $20 to buy his drugs. Why not just give the stuff away?

Marijuana would be sold like alcohol. Taxed and regulated.

Sadly, we don't seem to be heading in this sensible direction. In fact, the government has lately been standing logic on its head, running television commercials in which drugs are associated with terrorists and criminals. Duh. They're illegal. Who is supposed to sell them? Back when we tried Prohibition, the government could associate beer with gangsters. Well, yeah. It was illegal. Who was supposed to sell it?

It's not that any of this stuff is good. Drugs and booze have ruined many a life. In an ideal world, everybody would happily just say no to all artificial stimulants. But the world is an imperfect place.

The night after the failed drug bust, I went to the annual fund-raising dinner for Girls Inc. The dinner was held at Grant's Farm, and the hosts were Virginia and August Busch. (Barbara Jacobs is the chairwoman of the Girls Inc. board, and her husband, John, has been the right-hand man at the brewery to Virginia's husband.) Virginia spoke and chided Victoria Nelson, the organization's chief, for aiming too low with her fund-raising goal of $180,000. With that, Virginia's husband stepped forward and gave Nelson a check for $200,000.

What a magical moment that was, and it made me think about Prohibition. We used to outlaw beer, and it got us Al Capone. Now it's legal and we've got August Busch. Does anybody think we're not ahead?

This story was published in Metro on Monday, April 29, 2002.

Complete Title: Failed Narcotics Bust Once Again Shows the Futility of Drug War

Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)
Author: Bill McClellan
Published: Monday, April 29, 2002
Copyright: 2002 St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Contact: letters@post-dispatch.com
Website: http://home.post-dispatch.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Complete Series: Killing Pablo
http://freedomtoexhale.com/kp.htm

Drug War a Failure: Time to Return to NORML
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12669.shtml

Activists Say Drug Policy Not Working
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12668.shtml

Ending the War on Drugs Would Help End Violence
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12631.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #27 posted by FoM on April 30, 2002 at 19:47:42 PT
Jose
Thanks for the link. I'm looking forward to when I can watch a program. I got my satellite delivered yesterday and I can't wait to get it hooked up. They have until the 24th of May to get a FCC Licensed Techincan here to put it in or on or up whatever it is called that he will do.

Here's a link to the satellite system called DirecWay.

http://www.hns.com/

PS: I've been going with this slow connection so long I can't imagine what I'll be able to do. I know one thing is that when it is finally hooked up and working right and I know what I'm doing I'll go to look for news and that will be the one and only day there won't be any! LOL! Just kidding and thanks again for the link. Soon I will be able to enjoy them too.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #26 posted by Jose Melendez on April 30, 2002 at 19:22:56 PT
pot-tv.net
Latest on Tuck, Kubby?
http://www.pot-tv.net/archive/shows/pottvshowse-1295.html


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #25 posted by Jose Melendez on April 30, 2002 at 18:52:25 PT
signs of the times
we could even get some kind of corporate sponsors,,,,you know,,maybe Zig-Zag,or BongMart,ZIMA,,,Mikes Hard Lemonade,,,POPOV vodka,,and then we could have the car with decals of our sponsors all over it,like some Grateful Dead NASCAR racer from hell...

ha ha haaa haa ha ha...
... I love it!

nearly related, from:

Staying animated
Jim Pickard

Published: April 29 2002 09:41GMT

his may come as a surprise to Channel 4, which has just secured the UK rights to The Simpsons for £1m a show, but the most popular TV programme in the world could be on its last legs. Not that Matt Groening, the show's genial creator, who was in Bristol last weekend to open the Animated Encounters festival, puts it quite like that.

However, he's the first to admit that "it becomes increasingly difficult as the years go by to keep on not only surprising the audience, but surprising ourselves".

When The Simpsons was first put out as a stand-alone series in 1989 it attracted a great deal of criticism in the US, particularly from the Christian right. But the show has now become so popular that it usually stays out of trouble, says Groening. For instance, no one wrote in to complain when, in one show, Homer smoked cannabis to relieve his pain. (emphasis mine -jm)



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #24 posted by BGreen on April 30, 2002 at 18:33:46 PT
mayan, these articles are almost two-years-old
Thanks for prodding me into doing a little more research.

Rolla-Area Sheriff Says He'll Continue Drug Checkpoints:

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1816/a05.html

Critics Question Phelps County Sheriff's Drug Checkpoints:

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1615/a05.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by dddd on April 30, 2002 at 18:16:44 PT
......OK....
..I'll see if I can get a really cheap lawyer,,,my wallet is anorexic.....I guess we'll have to get a used car dealer on the team,,and maybe we could even get some kind of corporate sponsors,,,,you know,,maybe Zig-Zag,or BongMart,ZIMA,,,Mikes Hard Lemonade,,,POPOV vodka,,and then we could have the car with decals of our sponsors all over it,like some Grateful Dead NASCAR racer from hell.....dddd

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #22 posted by Jose Melendez on April 30, 2002 at 17:58:56 PT
shiny, happy people
I'll ddddo it if I can find enough legal coverage...

:)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by dddd on April 30, 2002 at 17:37:13 PT
I like that idea Jose....
...get a bunch of old cars...make sure they are completely clean,,,then,,smear a bunch of buds about in the trunk and under the hood,,beneath the seats...The dogs would go wild,and they would end up tearing the car apart looking for the contraband....I'd love to be a driver,,and play it up ,,acting sorta nervous,,,refusing to give them permission to search the vehicle....watching,,as they fabricate some sort of "probable cause" to tear apart the car..finding nothing..all caught on video tape........a new TV show on FOX,"Americas Wildest Law Enforcement Blunders"...Sounds like fun!......dddd

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #20 posted by mayan on April 30, 2002 at 17:09:26 PT
Did I Miss Something?
Indianapolis v. Edmond http://www.wyomingcops.com/features/indianapolis_v.htm

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #19 posted by kaptinemo on April 30, 2002 at 07:51:18 PT:

Fruit of the poisoned tree
Keep something in mind: Missouri was Ashcrofts' stomping grounds.

Ashcroft Administration Worked With Feds to Circumvent Missouri Law http://www.drugpolicy.org/lindesmith/news/pr-january19-01Ashcroft.html

Taking Cash into Custody http://civilliberty.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.kcstar.com/projects/drugforfeit/index.html

Ashcroft started the ball rolling, in his State...and he has yet to stop. And certainly will not.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by BGreen on April 30, 2002 at 05:43:31 PT
Jose
This particular trap happens every week, but I live too far away to know their schedule, if any.

The location is east-bound I-44 in Phelps county, 15 miles past Fort Leonard Wood military base and the town of St. Robert, about 9 miles before the town of Rolla.

They make million dollar busts on a regular basis, and nobody has made a case on the agencies involved.

I know the Phelps county sheriff dept. and the Highway Patrol are involved, and I saw a dark suburban with tinted windows speeding away from that location on Sunday that looked suspiciously like DEAth.

Missouri passed a law that turns seized money and property over to the schools, so the LEA swine circumvent that law by getting the DEAth involved and filing federal charges, which allows the Missouri agencies involved to keep up to 75% of the seized assets.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by Jose Melendez on April 30, 2002 at 04:42:39 PT:

Screw their drug war!
"I don't have anything to hide, but you've taken up enough of my time and I have to get going"

I say we entrap them. Put a video camcorder in the car, I'll even provide detailed, step by step instructions on installing hidden video. Then, making sure the car and driver are clean, go through the exit and record the process of refusing the search.

Now repeat with a different car/driver combo a few times, and I believe there will be enough video to expose such fraud. I might even supply the equipment if someone really wants to do this. At the very least, the waste of time and unconstitutional behavior will make great filler for a video I am making to arrest prohibition.

If legal assistance is provided, I'll be the driver. I really should have insisted Florida State Trooper Dance arrested me for that one seed he found after I refused to have my car searched...

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #16 posted by kaptinemo on April 30, 2002 at 04:34:35 PT:

Again and again and again....
One more time:

THE ACLU BUSTCARD: http://www.aclu.org/library/bustcard.html

and some good advice: Reprinted response to ACLU "Bust Card" http://www.t0.or.at/scl/scl12/msg02013.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by BGreen on April 30, 2002 at 03:15:36 PT
Subterfuge
The courts have ruled that people who have nothing to hide would proceed through the checkpoint without a second thought, thus opening the door for unscrupulous trickery like this.

Subterfuge is the word LEA's use to describe their lying.

sub.ter.fuge

1 : deception by artifice or stratagem in order to conceal, escape, or evade

2 : a deceptive device or stratagem

synonym see DECEPTION

This word was used by a Missouri State Highway Patrol investigator in court, describing the use of false statements meant to illicit a confession from the person being interrogated. In this particular case, a patrol sergeant was accused of raping an 11-year-old girl about 12 years ago. The investigator told the accused sgt. that there was physical evidence, which was a lie, but when this deception was presented in court, it was described as standard operating procedure. The sgt. claimed he never knew subterfuge was used and he was against it. Lying scum bag. This primordial slime spent 15 years as a pilot, flying his plane over my house and the rest of Missouri, destroying our beloved cannabis plant, as well as the lives of thousands. He was found not guilty, was reinstated to his former job, and will be out there again this year.

Another word about the busts along I-44. Almost every single bust I hear about, the people GAVE CONSENT to a search. The cops are good about getting people to do this. If they've given your license back and said you're free to go, you're FREE TO GO! Go! If they had probable cause they would have searched or brought a dog in. If they search, they will find it. Don't make it easy on them. I've read all kinds of things to say, like "I'm exerting my constitutional right ..." or something, but I think a statement like "I don't have anything to hide, but you've taken up enough of my time and I have to get going" would suffice.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by qqqq on April 30, 2002 at 01:33:41 PT
TRAP!
...That cop drug trap is very disturbing BGreen.....It's alot like the sobriety checkpoints we have here in California on major holidays...the cops hide out about a block before the checkpoint.If you do a u-turn,,you are pulled over immediatly....... .entrapment?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #13 posted by BGreen on April 30, 2002 at 01:18:12 PT
Off topic, but VERY important info
First, on topic, AB Brewing Co. pumps millions into the St. Louis and Missouri economy, so you won't hear bad words from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Secondly, I drove to St. Louis on Sunday, traveling east-bound on I-44. We encountered signs on both sides of the roadway at the 176 mile marker proclaiming: "Drug Checkpoint Ahead," then more signs, this time in Spanish as well as English, stating "Drug Dogs in Use."

These signs are placed just before an exit ramp.

DO NOT TAKE THE EXIT RAMP!!!!!!!!

It is a trap, and taking the exit will get you pulled over and searched without exception!

There are no gas stations or restaurants at this exit, so it is regularly used for this trap. They make huge busts that we hear about on the news, but the news never explains how the trap works, nor what happens to the person with small amounts of cannabis, but I guarantee you they're arrested.

It's a shock the first time you see these signs, and you'll be tempted to take the exit.

If you think about it, there is NO WAY they can have a drug checkpoint on a major interstate without backing up traffic for miles. However, when there was road construction going on in that area, they still used the signs, and didn't put the construction signs out until after the exit ramp. Sneaky bastards!

This activity isn't confined to Missouri, so take it to heart wherever you drive.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by The GCW on April 29, 2002 at 19:45:57 PT
You'd think Busch would have learned...
But instead of realizing they did not like porhibition... and how it treated them... so do not confront others with it...

They (Busch, the past target of Prohibition)fund the current prohibition.

Busch products are swill anyway!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by Jose Melendez on April 29, 2002 at 19:42:13 PT
this news might be good for Tuck, Kubby
From:
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n821/a01.html?397
JUDGE TOSSES OUT POT CASE

A Yolo County judge dismissed a case against a Esparto man last week after his attorney successfully argued that the marijuana his client grew was for medical use.

Fermin "Ed" Aldana, 61, was charged with cultivation of marijuana, a felony punishable by up to three years in state prison, after Yolo County sheriff's deputies discovered 50 marijuana plants growing near his apartment last August.

Following a preliminary hearing last Friday, Judge Thomas Warriner dismissed the case after hearing testimony from Aldana's doctor and a marijuana expert who said the number of plants Aldana grew would yield just about the amount of marijuana he used -- about a half-ounce a week -- to curb pain from arthritis.



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 19:28:05 PT
mayan
Thanks. I'm older and only listen to satellite music. I listen to a Classic Rock channel that doesn't have commercials or any picture just music. I never was good at names of groups or even names of songs except for the ones I really like. The Moody Blues are my favorite. I love Neil Young and CSNY songs.

The person who shot all those people in Germany didn't do and didn't like drugs. If he had done drugs we sure would have had in jammed down our throats.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by mayan on April 29, 2002 at 18:39:34 PT
FoM...
Busts are very common at Widespread Panic shows. Since the demise of the Grateful Dead & the unofficial breakup of Phish, younger folks have been searching for their own music scene. Widespread Panic has been filling that vacuum rather nicely. Panic is one of my favorite bands & I highly recommend seeing them - but as that article points out,the heat is on their trail.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by E_Johnson on April 29, 2002 at 17:51:34 PT
Beer is wasted on Americans
Hell, they already hold nearly 50% of the domestic beer market...talk about greedheads. How many people have drove their car into a tree & died after pounding a twelve of Buds?

Budweiser has no flavor, maybe that's why Americans pound them down by the dozen.

They're greedy, hypocritical, and at the end of the day, what they do to beer is a crime in itself.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 16:39:12 PT
Thanks mayan
I know it is all too common.

I saw this article you posted earlier and I didn't know if I should post it. I don't know if problems at concerts are common or is this unique? I'm not young anymore and don't know what goes on at concerts. I noticed they want to immediately blame the drug for the young woman's unfortunate death. This article is a tough call for the reasons I've mentioned.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by mayan on April 29, 2002 at 16:26:15 PT
Sorry, FoM...
that is terrible to hear. Unfortunately it is all to common.

Off Topic - Careful at "Panic" Shows: http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_standard.xsl?/base/news/1020071730297109.xml

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 15:48:09 PT
mayan
We lost a good friend back in the 70s because he did just exactly what you said. It was the beer that killed him not drugs.

You said:

How many people have drove their car into a tree & died after pounding a twelve of Buds.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by mayan on April 29, 2002 at 15:40:43 PT
Hypocrisy
Anheuser-Busch Inc. has been a staunch supporter of the war on drugs. They just don't want the competition from cannabis. Hell, they already hold nearly 50% of the domestic beer market...talk about greedheads. How many people have drove their car into a tree & died after pounding a twelve of Buds? How many have died from cannabis? McClellan is right in realizing that Prohibition II is a gigantic failure, but he fails to recognize the hypocrisy of brewers like Anheuser-Busch who perpetuate it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 13:18:01 PT
No Review for Drug Dealer Policy
The Supreme Court refused Monday to enter a constitutional debate over the policy of banishing drug dealers or other criminals from neighborhoods with severe drug and crime problems.

The court did not comment in rejecting an appeal from authorities in Cincinnati. The city tried to ban drug criminals from the crime- and drug-plagued Over-the-Rhine neighborhood, but the policy was declared unconstitutional in state and federal courts.

No Review for Drug Dealer Policy
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12667.shtml

Source: Associated Press
Author: Anne Gearan, Associated Press Writer
Published: April 29, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Associated Press

Related Article:

Drug-Zone Law Fails Court Test
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11119.shtml


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by E_Johnson on April 29, 2002 at 13:15:46 PT
It's not even his worst sin
Oh yeah, August Busch is a great guy - I guess the author doesn't mind entire generations of youth being brainwashed with alcohol advertising.

Even worse are the crimes this man's family have committed against beer itself!

Drink Heineken!



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on April 29, 2002 at 12:35:09 PT
you're right
"It's not that any of this stuff is good. Drugs and booze have ruined many a life. In an ideal world, everybody would happily just say no to all artificial stimulants. But the world is an imperfect place."

Right on - we should stick to cannabis, not artificially processed stuff like alcohol and cigs.

Oh yeah, August Busch is a great guy - I guess the author doesn't mind entire generations of youth being brainwashed with alcohol advertising.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on April 29, 2002 at 12:30:57