Cannabis News Cannabis TV
  Activists Say Drug Policy Not Working
Posted by FoM on April 29, 2002 at 10:47:08 PT
By John Christie, Middletown Press Staff 
Source: Middletown Press  

justice Students and activists committed to ending the so-called "War on Drugs" gathered at Wesleyan University over the weekend to discuss alternative drug policies and ways to press lawmakers to change the government's approach to the problem.

"We had representation from Rhode Island, Boston and Washington DC," said Booth Haley, a member of Wesleyan's chapter of Students for Sensible Drug Policy. "It's great that we got so much support from students and adults."

Activists held workshops Saturday and Sunday, discussing alternatives to prison for drug offenders. Haley, like many who attended the summit, likened current drug policies to the prohibition on alcohol during the 1920s, which resulted in an extensive black market trade and increased crime and addiction.

"The War on Drugs is flawed," Haley said. "Prohibition did not work for alcohol and it's not working for drugs like marijuana, heroin and cocaine.

"Like with alcohol, there needs to be a distinction between use and abuse when it comes to drugs," he said. "The government spends millions of dollars on a prison system where 60 percent of people there are there for drugs. Wouldn't that money be better spent on education?"

On Sunday, Cliff Thornton, a teacher at Trinity College in Hartford, led a discussion on alternative drug policies, such as the legalization of certain drugs that could be regulated through the country's medical system. He also stressed treatment over imprisonment for drug users.

However, Thornton acknowledged that convincing government officials to change what amounts to a billion dollar industry will be monumental task.

"What we want to do is to get the black market out of it and to have a truthful dialogue about the effects of drugs -- which there isn't much of now," Thornton said. "People are told if they used marijuana they're definitely going to try heroin and other hard drugs, which isn't true."

Thornton noted that in Holland, where recreational drug use is legal and regulated, use of harder drugs is decreasing.

Steven Silverman, executive director of Flex Your Rights, said beyond presenting alternative policy, the movement must engage citizens with the moral message for legalizing drugs.

"It is wrong to put someone in jail for what they decided to put in their bodies," Silverman said.

Adam Hurter, an activist for EFFICACY, agreed the movement has to look to winning "the hearts and minds" of American citizens, but it must be coupled with sound alternative policies that allow people to see how drug legalization works in the real world.

"Right now when some people hear legalization they think cocaine vending machines in high schools," Hurter said. "Construction is more important than destruction. We can't just try to destroy the War on Drugs without offering an alternative."

Thornton noted that the "demonizing" of drugs like marijuana is one of the biggest obstacles to making the case for legalization.

"Our fantasies about drugs and drug use are truly out there," he said. "We have to bring these discussions back to earth. Okay, if you agree that drug use will never fully go away, what then? What are we doing right now?"

For more information on Students for Sensible Drug Policy visit the group's Website at: http://www.ssdp.org

Source: Middletown Press (CT)
Author: John Christie, Middletown Press Staff
Published: April 29, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Middletown Press
Contact: editor@middletownpress.com
Website: http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1645

CannabisNews Articles - SSDP
http://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=ssdp


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #3 posted by Jose Melendez on April 29, 2002 at 12:08:16 PT
link to comment#2 source
Failed narcotics bust once again shows the futility of drug war
http://home.post-dispatch.com/channel/pdweb.nsf/da37732b0078d6c285256ad500494df3/86256a0e0068fe5086256baa003c282e


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Jose Melendez on April 29, 2002 at 12:06:27 PT
Ashcroft's drug czar turned out to be a drug user?
from:
Failed narcotics bust once again shows the futility of drug war By Bill McClellan
...Wait a minute. Why don't we put all the users in prison?

There seems to be two problems with that. In the first place, it's awfully expensive. Secondly, we are them. If not you, probably your friends and relatives. I remember when John Ashcroft's nephews were busted for pot. For that matter, Ashcroft's drug czar turned out to be a drug user. If it can happen in Ashcroft's circles, who is immune? For that matter, I remember when John McCain's wife fessed up to a drug problem. And these are Republicans!

I've long believed that the most cost-effective way to handle the drug problem is to give the worst drugs away. We take a product that should cost just a couple of bucks, and we make it illegal. Consequently, everybody who handles it up and down the long distribution line has to be paid commensurate with the risk of going to jail. It's as if we made corn illegal, and drove the price of an ear to $20. In the end, the junkie has to break into your house and steal $200 worth of stuff that he can then sell for $20 to buy his drugs. Why not just give the stuff away?

Marijuana would be sold like alcohol. Taxed and regulated.

Sadly, we don't seem to be heading in this sensible direction. In fact, the government has lately been standing logic on its head, running television commercials in which drugs are associated with terrorists and criminals. Duh. They're illegal. Who is supposed to sell them? Back when we tried Prohibition, the government could associate beer with gangsters. Well, yeah. It was illegal. Who was supposed to sell it?

It's not that any of this stuff is good. Drugs and booze have ruined many a life. In an ideal world, everybody would happily just say no to all artificial stimulants. But the world is an imperfect place.

The night after the failed drug bust, I went to the annual fund-raising dinner for Girls Inc. The dinner was held at Grant's Farm, and the hosts were Virginia and August Busch. (Barbara Jacobs is the chairwoman of the Girls Inc. board, and her husband, John, has been the right-hand man at the brewery to Virginia's husband.) Virginia spoke and chided Victoria Nelson, the organization's chief, for aiming too low with her fund-raising goal of $180,000. With that, Virginia's husband stepped forward and gave Nelson a check for $200,000.

What a magical moment that was, and it made me think about Prohibition. We used to outlaw beer, and it got us Al Capone. Now it's legal and we've got August Busch. Does anybody think we're not ahead?

STLtoday.com/McClellan

bmcclellan@post-dispatch.com



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by paul peterson on April 29, 2002 at 11:17:11 PT:

Yes, there are people out there, even in Illinois
A lot of people, even our elders, are willing to listen. The problem is, once they have a vested interest in the status quo, they clam shut like a safe. The best darned new argument I think we have is that CANNABIS is more than a cost effective alternative to many medications on the market, and that gives us an important entroit to the retired set, with fixed incomes and all, and a real need for analgesics, and all sorts of medications for high blood pressure and neurodegenerative diseases. Right now, there is important research coming out about these matters. Many neurodegenerative diseases, like parkinson's, alzheimers, strokes, TOURETTE'S, ADD, DEPRESSION, EPILEPSY, can be safer treated with cannabis than many alternatives.

The biggest argument against legalization was, at one time, that pot can be purchased in "pill form", through that marinol pill (THC). But I am told that this costs some 10 times what the natural product can do better. Once people know this truly, they will join our cause.

ITS THE MONEY LOST TO DRUG COMPANY PROFITS THAT DRIVES THE DRUG WAR (in addition to a lot of jailers that might just be able to be trained to become productive memebers of society). PAUL PETERSON

[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on April 29, 2002 at 10:47:08