Cannabis News The November Coalition
  U.S. Doubts Effects of Coca Plan
Posted by FoM on April 07, 2002 at 08:41:45 PT
By Scott Wilson, Washington Post Foreign Service 
Source: Washington Post 

justice As the civil war in Colombia persists, U.S. officials have become increasingly pessimistic about whether a popular U.S.-sponsored program that pays farmers to uproot coca and replace it with legal crops will have any lasting success against the drug industry.

The alternative development program is the most socially oriented element of a $1.3 billion anti-drug aid package Congress approved almost two years ago with the goal of cutting Colombia's coca production in half by 2005.

Although it is only a small fraction of a package tilted heavily toward military assistance, alternative development has long been seen as the most politically acceptable part of a U.S. anti-drug strategy frequently criticized as a war plan targeting Colombia's Marxist insurgency.

A number of U.S. officials are rethinking the program less than a year after it began here in southern Colombia's coca fields. Security concerns, unfavorable economics and a history of mistrust between the Colombian government and coca farmers who produce 90 percent of the cocaine arriving in the United States have complicated the program in ways that U.S. officials now believe could be insurmountable.

Following two critical recent reviews of the program, U.S. officials have decided to shift its focus from helping individual farmers to creating public works jobs in coca-growing regions, tailor development projects by community and begin development efforts in areas less fraught by civil war than this one 350 miles south of the capital, Bogota. Even so, U.S. officials acknowledge, funding the $42.5 million program beyond this year is in question.

Here in the southern province of Putumayo, the heart of Colombia's coca trade, only a tiny fraction of farmers who agreed to uproot their coca plants by the end of July have done so. That resistance, rooted mostly in a legacy of failed government promises in this remote patch of pasture and jungle, was reflected in a recent U.S. Embassy study that found that few of the 37,000 small-scale farmers who signed up for government aid last year in return for abandoning coca crops intend to comply.

Congressional auditors recently concluded that the program was failing, mostly because of a lack of security in coca-growing regions heavily contested by the two largest irregular armies in Colombia's nearly four-decade civil war. But farmers and town officials say the problems stem more from the long delays in deliveries of aid and a U.S.-backed herbicide spraying campaign that has at times targeted farmers who have agreed to pull up their coca voluntarily.

"Some of these people had started the process of pulling up their coca. They were getting ready with corn, yucca, and then the fumigation started," said Leandro Romo, the human rights ombudsman in the nearby town of La Hormiga, referring to spraying late last year. "We're not arguing with the goal, just the methods. This has been indiscriminate. And until now the farmers have received virtually nothing."

Alternative development in Colombia dates back more than a decade. The notion of helping coca farmers develop a legal economy through subsidies and technical assistance has been embraced by interests as diverse as European countries and Colombia's largest guerrilla insurgency. But it has never had much effect on a multibillion-dollar coca trade that pays peasants significantly more than they earn with legal crops.

Recently released figures compiled by the CIA showed that coca cultivation jumped 25 percent in 2001 to 419,000 acres.

U.S. officials blame the substitution program's problems on the government's inability to secure coca-growing regions. Those areas are fiercely contested by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC as the largest guerrilla insurgency is known, and the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, a paramilitary group that fights the guerrillas alongside Colombia's military.

Both groups profit enormously from coca cultivation by exacting "taxes" at various stages of the cocaine production process.

Earlier this year, a General Accounting Office audit recommended that Congress end funding for alternative development in Colombia until the government could provide security for alternative development officials working in southern war zones. Last year, four alternative development workers were kidnapped in Putumayo. Two were killed, and two are missing and presumed dead, although Colombian officials dispute whether they were killed because of their alternative development work.

About $4.4 million of the $42.5 million in U.S. aid set aside last year for alternative development programs was actually spent. The Colombian government intends to spend $40 million on alternative development in coca-growing regions this year, about 40 percent less than in 2001. Most of that money comes from European donors.

The plan in southern Colombia, where the bulk of U.S.-sponsored alternative projects are based, is to give farmers with less than seven acres of coca roughly $800 worth of seeds, fertilizer and animals to turn small land holdings into pig, cow or fish farms. Some 37,000 farmers with more than 80,000 acres of coca agreed last summer to pull up the crops by the end of July 2002 in exchange for aid -- or risk being hit by aerial herbicide spraying. The Colombian government also pledged to build several major new highways to help farmers move legal crops and livestock to markets that today can take up to 10 hours to reach along dirt highways.

But only about 150 acres of coca had been pulled up voluntarily by the end of January, according to U.S. officials. "What happened was that the Colombian government kind of oversubscribed," said an official with the U.S. Agency for International Development. "Plante [the Colombian agency managing the program] didn't have the capacity."

Maria Ines Restrepo, the director of Plante, said the program was in part a victim of its own ambitious plans. In a recent interview, Restrepo said successful alternative development programs in Peru and Bolivia, which were carried out under far less complicated conditions, took years to show results. She suggested that "an overly ambitious timeline" was developed in Colombia to help secure U.S. aid.

"This was a political decision, not a technical one," said Restrepo, who says she believes the project is working.

But viewed from the small farms of Cairo, where almost every peasant family has at least several acres of coca alongside corn, yucca and plantain crops, alternative development appeared destined to fail from the start.

The small subsidies started arriving in late November, months after most farmers had signed contracts with the government. By then, most farmers had forgotten about their end of the agreement or had started planting coca again. When a small ceremony was held in La Hormiga to pass out the first batch of farm aid, a sense of too-little too-late pervaded the event.

"These villages still don't have much confidence in the government," said Alejandro Ardila, a 52-year-old farmer picking up an aid package. "Instead of the spraying they do, they should have been giving us credits. This may help our confidence a little, but not much."

The $800 assistance package amounts to a small fraction of what most farmers make in a single coca harvest. About two acres of coca will yield a kilogram of coca base worth about $800, and coca can be harvested as many four times a year.

"There is no way the farmers will comply because they cannot support a family on what the state gives them," said Carlos Palacios, the former development secretary for the county of La Hormiga that includes this village. "No one is going to comply."

Jaimec Aguirre Gomez, who like many Putumayo coca farmers arrived in the last decade from Colombia's declining coffee region, has a typical farm for these parts: Five rolling acres split evenly between coca and food crops to feed his wife and two sons. He left another four acres of coca to wither after a round of fumigation a year ago prompted him to sign up for the alternative development program.

In preparing for aid he hoped would help him start a pig farm, Aguirre invested $400 to build animal pens and plant crops that would provide animal feed. But in November, the day he received his first visit from government alternative development technicians, spray planes flew over his house and killed the beans and vines he had planted in preparation.

"This pretty much ended my confidence in the program," Aguirre said. "They told us they were going to organize credit, new markets, all of this. But now nothing."

Aguirre and others from Cairo have been receiving about $800 per kilo of coca base, which makes cocaine, from men who visit his farm. He does not ask who they are, but town officials said the men were from the paramilitary force that over the past year has driven guerrillas from coca fields near town centers and now act as the area's sole coca dealers.

"The plan here so far has been fumigation, nothing else," said Enrique, the regional paramilitary commander. "The government would have had a lot more success if they said, 'We as the state will buy all the legal crops you produce.' Now there is no market."

Note: Alternative Program Fails to Win Over Colombian Farmers.

Staff writer Karen DeYoung in Washington contributed to this report.

Source: Washington Post (DC)
Author: Scott Wilson, Washington Post Foreign Service
Published: Sunday, April 7, 2002; Page A13
Copyright: 2002 The Washington Post Company
Contact: letterstoed@washpost.com
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

U.S. Promotion of Legal Crops Fails to Stem Coca
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12397.shtml

Aid Didn't Cut Coca Farming, U.S. Says
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12388.shtml

Witness: Drug War Spraying Colombia To Death
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12171.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #3 posted by Blaze on April 08, 2002 at 00:40:52 PT
????????????
what i'm too stone

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Dan B on April 07, 2002 at 11:36:35 PT:

Afghanistan Connection
from http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread12450.shtml

Hamid Karzai's interim administration agreed unanimously this week to a decree that offers Afghan farmers £175 for every jerib (about 2sq km) of opium poppies they destroy. "The holy religion of Islam is categorical about the evil impact of drugs," says the decree. "We are determined to eradicate the current poppy crop".

In other words, the same plan that has not worked in Colombia will be tried in Afghanistan in hopes that it will also not work there. Both plans are funded by the United States government. Any questions about the real engine that drives the so-called war-on-some-drugs? Here's a hint: they want to increase the yield at the same time they increase the price. The United States government is the largest drug cartel on the planet.

Dan B

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Rainbow on April 07, 2002 at 09:57:33 PT
A movie
The bush-ites should be required to watch the movie "We were soldiers".

They might change their collective idiotic minds.

Rainbow

#349 thank goodness

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on April 07, 2002 at 08:41:45