Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  Fire Officials Will Enforce Zero Tolerance
Posted by FoM on April 06, 2002 at 08:47:58 PT
By Kevin Flynn 
Source: New York Times 

justice The New York Fire Department alerted firefighters yesterday that it planned to begin strictly enforcing the department's zero tolerance policy on the use of illegal drugs, and would dismiss those who failed drug tests, department officials said.

Fire officials described the effort as a precautionary measure and said they did not believe drug abuse within the agency was widespread. But some in the department have said they worry that firefighters may resort to drug or alcohol abuse to cope with the devastating loss of 343 of their colleagues in the terrorist attack of Sept. 11.

The department has long prohibited the use of illegal drugs, but fire officials said that enforcement of the policy had been spotty. To show leniency involving substance abuse of any form, the officials said, would be dangerous and would undermine public confidence in the force.

"I am very sympathetic to their concerns," Fire Commissioner Nicholas Scoppetta said of grieving firefighters. "On the other hand, resorting to drugs is where we draw the line because it is too dangerous. Dangerous to them. Dangerous to their colleagues and to the public."

The department's policy on drug and alcohol abuse, last revised in 1996, recommends the dismissal of firefighters for any drug infraction, on duty or off.

As a practical matter, however, the department has often shown leniency in such cases. In recent years, firefighters and fire officers who were charged with drug possession or who failed a drug test often were disciplined but not dismissed.

Indeed, several weeks ago, Mr. Scoppetta himself suspended, but did not dismiss, a rookie firefighter who tested positive for marijuana use. Mr. Scoppetta said he would not discuss decisions involving individuals. But in general he said he did not think it was fair to begin strictly enforcing the policy until he had made it clear to everyone in the 11,000-member department that, as he put it, "the rules of the game have changed."

"Without sending out a reminder it seemed inappropriate or unfair to apply the policy when it was not applied in the past," he said. "And my review showed me the policy was not being applied evenly."

The Police Department has had a zero tolerance policy since the mid-1980's and generally dismisses officers without exception if they test positive for illegal drugs.

Mr. Scoppetta said he had informed the Uniformed Firefighters Association and the Uniformed Fire Officers Association of his plans on Thursday. An order alerting individual fire companies of the department's intentions was issued last night, fire officials said.

Both unions said they supported the department's efforts to eliminate the use of illegal drugs, but said that they hoped that officials would continue to exercise discretion. "We are concerned that each case should be handled individually by someone capable of making a judgment call," said Capt. Peter Gorman, president of the fire officers association, which represents many supervisors.

The Fire Department routinely administers drug tests to job applicants and to rookie firefighters as they finish their first year on the job. It does not do random testing on more senior personnel, except in cases where someone has filed an allegation of abuse or when a firefighter has been involved in a serious motor vehicle accident, fire officials said. The existing policy also contains sanctions for alcohol abuse that include the loss of up to 90 days' pay for being intoxicated while on duty.

Mr. Scoppetta said the department did not have any evidence that drug or alcohol abuse within the department had risen since Sept. 11. But another senior fire official said that some in the department were concerned because studies have shown that rescue workers experienced higher rates of substance abuse after the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

The alert issued yesterday said the strict stance was being put into effect immediately. It also stated that firefighters who felt they had substance abuse problems could avoid sanctions if they came forward and entered counseling.

Fire officials said that, since Sept. 11, some 2,500 members of the department have sought counseling for a variety of problems, a large increase over a typical year, when only about 600 people seek help from the agency's counseling unit. The officials said the vast majority of those who have come forward in the past seven months were suffering from stress but that 114 of them sought drug or alcohol counseling.

Complete Title: Fire Officials Will Enforce Zero Tolerance for Drug Abuse

Source: New York Times (NY)
Author: Kevin Flynn
Published: April 6, 2002
Copyright: 2002 The New York Times Company
Contact: letters@nytimes.com
Website: http://www.nytimes.com/
Forum: http://forums.nytimes.com/comment/

CannabisNews Articles - Zero Tolerance
http://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=zero+tolerance


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #4 posted by BGreen on April 07, 2002 at 00:43:34 PT
Did ya notice?
The policy apparently doesn't forbid drinking on the job, just being intoxicated. Is that over the .08 legal limit?

I'm going to Amsterdam next month to get away from this BS. You'll recognize me, I'm the one with the huge perma-grin.

Peace.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by john wayne on April 06, 2002 at 21:10:31 PT
hey firefighther
time to put down that spliff and pick up that fifth. 'cuz they won't be testing for the alky.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Lehder on April 06, 2002 at 13:43:19 PT
whiskey breath
So a few firemen test positive for marijuana and the drug warriors make an association between "drug use" and, as they are euphemistically called, 'the events of September 11:'

But some in the department have said they worry that firefighters may resort to drug or alcohol abuse to cope with the devastating loss of 343 of their colleagues in the terrorist attack of Sept. 11.

I've been puzzling over this most curious statement off and on all day. Why would the loss of their colleagues impel firemen to smoke marijuana? I have never heard of anyone driven to smoke weed because of a personal loss or trauma, and it would be most inappropriate to do so because marijuana offers not the least bit of "escape from reality." On the contrary, marijuana assists one in reflections on reality.

But finally it dawned on me: this is the culture of alcohol speaking. Alcohol provides an escape from reality and, unlike marijuana, produces a physical and moral enfeeblement. This, utterly ignorant about marijuana, is the voice of the drug-warring boozer speaking. Had a rough day? "I need a drink!" Kid busted for pot? "I need a drink!" WTC attacked? Have a few drinks and declare a forty-year war on the world.

Marijuana offers many benefits, both mental and physical. It's never harmed anyone except via arrest and prison.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by kaptinemo on April 06, 2002 at 10:37:00 PT:

As if there weren't suffering enough
I imagine the NYC bars have been doing a booming business these past few months. Not to mention liquor stores. How many firemen and police are drowning their sorrows in record numbers? I have no figures...but I'd wager quite a few.

And what sanctions shall be raised against the alcoholism that will eventually result? Is anyone worried about firemen taking quick sips from brown bags? Police spending more time in the vicinity of a liquor store than simple suveillance allows?

Yes, those who died were heroes. Those who have been painfully combing the wreckage have earned that sobriquet as well. But to now go after them as if they were prisoners in jail instead of free men and women serving their community proudly is just one more indication that we have a governemnt that demands sacrifice of others...but not it's leaders.

After, all, I don't see Hizzoner da Mayuh stepping up to be the first to be tested. Sir Rudy is too busy giving advice to the Brit Royals (who in their senescence gave him a title; it wasn't Giuliani that kept the city going, but those nameless, faceless municipal workers and its' own citizens that did) and any who will listen about the importance of chasing down potheads as part of his "Broken Windows" ideology.

Seems to me there are several million tons of "Broken Windows" caused by some very dangerous people... who are still at large. Perhaps the city of New York might have better things to do than chase cannabis consumers. And insulting it's own heroes...

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on April 06, 2002 at 08:47:58