Cannabis News Marijuana Policy Project
  Effort To Merge Drug, Terror Wars In Colombia
Posted by FoM on April 01, 2002 at 14:16:08 PT
By Gary Fields, Staff Reporter of The WSJ 
Source: Wall Street Journal  

justice The Bush administration's plan to merge the war on drugs in Colombia with its war on terror already is running into flak on Capitol Hill, even while most lawmakers are still away on their spring recess.

Just 11 days ago, the administration sent Congress a broad $27.1 billion emergency spending bill; part of it would allow Colombia to expand its use of American military training, intelligence and equipment beyond its fight against drug traffickers. The idea is to free Colombia's government to use some of its American aid to battle three rebel groups that the U.S. has cited as terrorist organizations, and which it recently has made a point of linking to the drug trade as well.

Drug Enforcement Administrator Asa Hutchinson, who traveled to Colombia last week to discuss the initiative with law-enforcement officials and President Andres Pastrana, says the administration is moving because it increasingly sees links between terrorism and drug-trafficking money. The U.S., he argues, merely is recognizing the groups' multiple roles and "the multifaceted nature of the operations of the Colombian military, that they are counternarcotics but also counterterrorists."

Others aren't so sure. Critics on Capitol Hill worry that lifting current restrictions on aid might allow the Colombian military to ignore the drug war and focus solely on fighting internal rebels. Some also worry that without restrictions on the Colombian army's ties to paramilitary groups, the proposal will invite human-rights violations. And there are fears that the plan is too open-ended and lacking a clear mission.

Democratic Reps. James McGovern of Massachusetts and Ike Skelton of Missouri have drafted a letter of concern to send to President Bush, and are asking colleagues to sign by next week. Two influential senators have raised caution flags as well: Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that handles foreign aid, and Iowa Republican Charles Grassley, a leader of the Senate drug caucus, both say they want to see more details.

"The administration has requested broad new authority to permit U.S. aid to the Colombian military to be used for any purpose as long as it relates to Colombia's security," says Sen. Leahy. "That is not the type of blank check that Congress should sign."

In an interview Saturday in the daily newspaper Reforma, President Pastrana said he had won the political battle against Marxist rebels since halting peace talks more than a month ago, and he called on Congress to support his government by approving the Bush administration's request.

Colombia and its role in the U.S. drug problem have long presented a problem for U.S. presidents. The country is the oldest democracy in South America. But it also is rife with corruption and drug factions, and is responsible for producing the majority of the cocaine that is used in the U.S. At the same time, it is mired in a 38-year-old civil war that now pits the government against three insurgency groups: the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the National Liberation Army and the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia. The FARC, created in 1964 as the military wing of the Colombian Communist Party, is the oldest, largest and arguably best equipped of the three.

Until now, U.S. policy has distinguished between the fight to stem Colombia's drug traffickers, which the U.S. was prepared to assist, and Colombia's civil war, which the U.S. has tried to avoid. Washington has been providing equipment -- including dozens of helicopters -- and helping to train Colombian soldiers in counternarcotics operations. Colombia received $380.5 million in the current fiscal year for counterdrug initiatives.

Now, though, the Bush administration is trying to knock down that distinction, arguing that there are links between the insurgent groups and the drug trade, some of which date back to the 1970s.

Indeed, in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S., the Bush administration has been moving to strengthen the perception of a link between terrorism and drug trafficking. The Office of National Drug Control Policy began a stark ad campaign suggesting that the money spent to buy drugs in the U.S. supports terrorists. The DEA's Mr. Hutchinson has spoken repeatedly about drug proceeds funding terrorist groups.

All three of Colombia's insurgency groups are now on the State Department's list of terrorist organizations, since the United Self-Defense Forces were added in October. That's in part because of violent acts the groups have committed in response to U.S. support of drug-eradication programs in Colombia.

In the past few weeks, the administration has been trying to draw the links even more clearly. Mr. Hutchinson told a Senate panel recently: "While the DEA does not specifically target terrorists, we will target and track down drug traffickers and drug-trafficking organizations involved in terrorist acts."

A few days later, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that three FARC leaders had been indicted on conspiracy to import cocaine into the U.S., charges that asserted a direct link between the rebel group and drug trafficking. The administration's supplemental-spending plan proposal went to Congress three days after that indictment.

In that proposal, the administration asks Congress for $372.5 million in emergency aid to help the militaries of 19 countries -- including Yemen, Oman, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Turkey and Colombia -- fight terrorism. Colombia, though, is singled out for a loosening of restrictions on the use of U.S. aid.

Clearly, some on Capitol Hill will strongly support the plan. Sen. Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican on the Armed Services Committee, says he began urging the administration to send up such a proposal more than a year ago. Under current restrictions, he says, the Colombian military can't use American helicopters unless it is on a mission that clearly fits the counternarcotics description. "There's no way we can expect Colombia to stop drug-dealing in their country if they don't control their own territory, so to ask them to help us fight drugs in Colombia means we have to help them," he says.

Sen. Grassley says that while he is happy to see the administration cite the link between terrorism and drugs, he is doubtful that the Colombia proposal will be addressed any time soon. It's likely to be stalled by a concurrent dispute over the Bush administration's refusal to let its director of homeland security, Thomas Ridge, testify before Congress.

In the letter they are circulating to colleagues, Reps. McGovern and Skelton write that while they acknowledge Colombia needs U.S. help, they are concerned that the potential changes are but a "tiny first step" that focuses on a military solution without addressing broader economic problems that produce dissent.

For his part, Mr. Hutchinson says the proposal simply opens the way to a broader training and support role for the U.S., and doesn't represent a move directly into the military conflict there. While the plan would remove some of "the artificial restraints," he says, "we're going to have restrictions and there will be a carefully defined support role" for U.S. money and military advisers.

"What we're talking about is training and the use of the equipment we've provided to them, that it can be used to do drug interdictions which, these days, flows over into terrorism and guerrillas," he says.

Complete Title: Effort To Merge Drug, Terror Wars In Colombia Hits Some Resistance

Source: Wall Street Journal (US)
Author: Gary Fields, Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
Published: April 1, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Website: http://www.wsj.com/
Contact: letter.editor@wsj.com

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

Promotion of Legal Crops Fails to Stem Coca
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12397.shtml

Direct U.S. Aid to Colombia Likely
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12332.shtml

US Seeks to Protect Colombia Pipeline
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12329.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #9 posted by Jose Melendez on April 02, 2002 at 10:49:46 PT:

national security
File this under:

Hemp for Victory 2

Tuesday April 2, 1:17 PM

Iran would 'consider' using oil as weapon against US over Israel

Iran would consider using oil as a weapon to force the United States to pressure Israel into withdrawing from Palestinian territory, Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi said.

Responding at a news conference to a proposal floated by Iraq Monday, Kharazi said the use of Arab oil to turn the screws on the US and Israel would depend on a collective decision by Islamic countries.

If there was a surplus of cannabis seed, extra oil could be used as biodiesel, which even mixed with fossil fuels yields a much cleaner exhaust, in addition to the obvious reduction in foreign oil dependence.

HINT: this idea would have much more credibility from people like Colin Powell or Lee Iacocca.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by Dan B on April 02, 2002 at 05:51:19 PT:

Arrest does not mean jail
I was only arrested once, and it was for an assault I did not commit (but I was there with some friends who were committing assault. Fortunately, I got the charge dropped--and expunged from my record). Anyway, I was arrested, but never put into a jail cell. I was instead "detained" at the police station (they were military police, by the way). So, technically they can say that they aren't jailing cannabis users if all they are doing is "detaining" them (which amounts to jailing in a room rather than in a jail cell). And they can detain people for up to 24-48 hours (depending on the jurisdiction).

Still, I find it incredibly difficult to believe that they are not jailing any cannabis users when 750,000 are arrested every year. Are they saying that they can't make the charges stick for every single cannabis user who is arrested? Baloney. Are they saying that the penalties for possession do not include imprisonment? Also baloney. Just go to www.norml.org and click on the link to state and federal cannabis laws to prove this one is not true. Asa is flat-out lying, and everyone who knows anything about the subject knows he is lying.

But it sure says a lot about the administration's confidence in its position on drugs if it feels the need to lie about what it is doing, doesn't it?

Dan B

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by ekim on April 01, 2002 at 16:16:51 PT:

Richard Cowan announces new sites
http://www.marijuananews.com/news.php3?sid=487

P4me send this to the IL. man that was disbared.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by goneposthole on April 01, 2002 at 16:03:33 PT
Government Legalizes Cannabis
Unfortunately, it is April Fool's Day.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by MikeEEEEE on April 01, 2002 at 15:49:43 PT
Past Wars
All or most countries that have fought two front wars have lost, a prime example are the Nazi's. Merging the two wars might be an effort to keep the lost drug war alive.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by ekim on April 01, 2002 at 15:45:01 PT:

DEA Head on C-span today
The calls were 15 aginst the drug war and 1 for with a email for too. Asia said no cannabis users were in jail. With 750,000 arrested last year for cannabis I thought that once you were arrested you went to jail how does he get away with saying that. People kept calling in to tell him not to merge the war with cannabis. I tried to call and ask him what was being done with the info that has been collected from the seven Fed. Cannabis users for the last 25 years.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by FoM on April 01, 2002 at 15:32:35 PT
overtoke thanks - good April Fool's Day article
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread12412.shtml#9

Check this out if you haven't seen it yet.
http://www.drugpolicy.org/changeofheart/flash.html


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by overtoke on April 01, 2002 at 15:22:16 PT:

Columbian version of Super Bowl Ads
Check this out: http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0401-08.htm

The Partnership for a Tobacco-Free Colombia and the government’s Office of Drug Suppression and Promotion (ODSP) have purchased two 30-second slots for their latest joint public service announcement. Previewed for this reporter by ODSP director José Cañusi, it presents shockingly blunt statements by three Colombian nicotine fiends:

• A college student says, “I helped a murderer buy a ski lodge in Aspen.”

• A 30-something businesswoman says, “I helped a murderer buy a yacht for his son and a Kentucky racehorse for his daughter.”

• A middle-aged policeman says, “I helped a murderer donate big bucks to the candidate who won the U.S. presidency.”

Then, in blood-red letters against a black background, this message scrolls across the screen: “Colombia has one-sixth the population of the United States, yet every year more Colombians die from American cigarettes than Americans die from Colombian cocaine and heroin. If you smoke, not only are you killing yourself, you’re enriching the murderous gringos of Big Tobacco and the politicians they own.”

The first part of the Article is also very interesting. This company called “Qué Pasa?” which apparently sells cannabis...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Dark Star on April 01, 2002 at 14:36:47 PT
Easy Solution/Sick Fantasy
This is all requiring too much debate. Why not get it over with now, and have the current regime declare war on the world outside our borders in its entirety. We hate everybody, and they are all parasites in the administration view. Everyone is a target, including vast components of the domestic population.

All they need to do is say who they want to keep: hardline Republican Christian conservatives, invite everyone else to leave, and let the nukes fly. War on the world, from now until it's done. No terrorists, dissenters, drug users, foreigners or other parasites to worry about. Everyone can get fitted for electronic monitoring implants that will shock people out of unconventional thought, sex before marriage, the urge to vote for a Democrat, or alter their consciousness. Bush's wet dream.

He is high on power, and it is the mother of all bad trips.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on April 01, 2002 at 14:16:08