Cannabis News Stop the Drug War!
  Aid Didn't Cut Coca Farming, U.S. Says
Posted by FoM on March 29, 2002 at 08:24:13 PT
By T. Christian Miller 
Source: Seattle Times 

justice State Department officials have concluded that an alternative-development plan aimed at slashing drug crops has failed, a decision that raises doubts about the U.S.-backed effort to eradicate the primary source of narcotics on America's streets.

Farmers in southern Colombia who signed voluntary agreements to eliminate coca, the source of cocaine, in exchange for aid have eliminated little or none of their harvest and have no intention of doing so before a deadline later this year, according to a confidential State Department report.

As a result, U.S. Embassy officials have decided to abandon a plan to encourage the substitution of other crops and products for coca. Instead, they will concentrate on building large infrastructure projects to provide jobs, and improve living conditions and transportation.

And they will rely on a controversial aerial fumigation program to show farmers, mostly rural poor with small plots of land, that their coca will be wiped out if they do not stop growing it.

"There's nothing that we can offer the farmers as an alternative that comes near the value of coca," said Ken Ellis, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development in Colombia.

The U.S. decision represents a radical new direction in the alternative-development program, long touted as the only way to ensure a permanent reduction in the coca crops that fill valleys and riverbanks throughout southern Colombia, which is the source of most of the cocaine that reaches the United States.

Experts on alternative development and peasant farming say the changes spell disaster. Small-scale farmers, who often plant coca alongside traditional crops like corn, will face food shortages if spraying becomes the primary tool to encourage eradication and kills their food crops as well.

And they say that many of the farmers, who migrated to isolated southern Colombia in search of work, will simply move to other areas to grow coca if they are not taught how to raise other crops.

"You can spray all you want, you can spend all the money in Europe and the United States, but the problem of coca will continue," said Jesus Bastidas, the director of an alternative-development program here in this crowded state capital.

Colombian government officials acknowledge that the alternative-development program has failed to produce results. But they say more time and money are needed. Only 96 of Colombia's 222 coca-growing counties have programs in place.

"We need permanent support," said Maria Ines Restrepo, the head of Colombia's alternative-development program. "Our conflict is not going to end without social investment."

There are few problems more stubborn in the fight against drugs than what to do about the 100,000 or so small coca farmers in Colombia, a dilemma involving social, political and economic issues intertwined with Colombia's nearly 40-year-old guerrilla war.

Most of the farmers moved to isolated corners of Colombia in the 1970s and '80s in search of jobs or land. Once there, they grew traditional crops on small, 5-acre plots along with coca. They were helped by narcotics traffickers and leftist guerrillas, who provided seeds, loans and technical advice.

Although estimates vary, such farmers account for at least 15 percent of the coca grown in Colombia, which last year had about 321,000 acres of coca, according to a State Department report. The rest is grown on huge plantations.

Experts say that wiping out the coca through fumigation would simply lead to widespread displacement, food shortages and environmental damage, as farmers push deeper into Colombia's rain forest.

That's why Plan Colombia, the $1.3 billion U.S.-backed effort to halve drug production here by 2005, included a budget of more than $100 million for alternative development. The idea was to wean farmers off coca by providing new sources of income through alternative crops or jobs in industries such as rubber production.

Source: Seattle Times (WA)
Author: T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times
Published: Friday, March 29, 2002
Copyright: 2002 The Seattle Times Company
Contact: opinion@seatimes.com
Website: http://www.seattletimes.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

Witness: Drug War Spraying Colombia To Death
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12171.shtml

Activist Speaks Against U.S. Policy in Colombia
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12146.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on March 29, 2002 at 12:03:34 PT
kapt and all
I have a real problem. I care about all people not just me and my family and people in the USA. I don't hate people but I do hate certain things. I hate seeing a family hungry or cold or sick with no one to help them even to ease the pain. I love the earth and the birds and oceans and all the wonder of this marvelous planet. I want everyone in every country to have a chance to live in peace and with their own beliefs and traditions.

If someone grows a crop that is prohibited and the money they make puts food in their hungry children's stomachs then I don't blame them but blame the inflated price that prohibiton creates.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by dddd on March 29, 2002 at 11:55:38 PT
FoM
...just got off the fone with 4q..he gave me your nice message..Thank you.


...Kap,,,you rang a bell with your reminder about how good we have it.....When I was in Honduras a few years back,I had to hire some local help,,there were lines of guys hoping I would hire them..... 2 or 3 bucks an hour was all that was expected,,I couldnt hack such paltry wages, .It was kinda embarassing to realize that $50.00 was equivelent to a weeks pay..If only people knew the reality of the rest of the world,then they would be shocked into knowing how lucky they are,,,...ya know,,,someone who complains about the price of the gas that they are putting into their SUV,is obviously a spoiled American!...a safe place to sleep,and a blanket is deluxe!..a source of clean water to drink,,,superdeluxe!...a source of food..etc..etc...etc..
...my dog still says that a catastrophic event is eminent in the near future,,,however,,,he has not yet come up with a color to denote the level of alert..I'll let you know as soon as he does....until then,,let's just say that we are in an off white zone of alertness......dddd


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by Dark Star on March 29, 2002 at 11:21:37 PT
Juxtaposition
Isn't that special. Isn't that convenient. The Feds admit that they cannot pay the campesinos enough dinero to break them of the coca-growing habit. Whose fault is that? Could we blame prohibition? If cocaine were legal and regulated, other types of employment might be more logical to Juan Valdez.

Now the Feds seem to provide themselves no alternative to chemical warfare to kill the drug crops, and a lot of other living things along with it. Seems like a war crime to me. Too bad that our government is now withdrawing recognition of a court beyond our borders.

Our neighbors on this planet and the judgment of history will be harsh for these transgressions.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by kaptinemo on March 29, 2002 at 10:36:39 PT:

FoM, ain't that the truth
We Americans can bitch all we want, but materially we have it over the rest of the world. There are countries where homeless little kids are hunted like animals...because they bothered tourists for money...because they were effin' starving. Most Americans have rarely gone without a day or two of food, and think they know what hunger is. Hunger is one of the most powerful motivating forces in nature; that's why most animal traps are baited with food instead of trinkets.

You'd think our 'leaders' would understand that the same economic forces that drive some literally dirt-poor campesino to grow coca bushes are the same ones that make crop substitution laughable. Because "Juan Valdez" of coffee fame just can't get by on growing coffee, alone. His kids' bellies are empty; you'd think the antis would consider whether think he's going to care if some rich fool from El Norte gives himself a heart attack or aneurysm from snorting the nose candy he grows the basic component of?

But I guess that's too much to ask of antis; too many of them came out of the public school system, too...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by goneposthole on March 29, 2002 at 10:29:01 PT
Colonel Hiett's wife
can add and subtract. When it comes to heroin dealing, she was pretty good at numbers.

Is she a terrorista?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on March 29, 2002 at 10:26:26 PT
qqqq
And you tell dddd when you talk to him to have a peaceful Easter too. What a sad day in the news. It is almost prophetic. My mind is spinning from it all.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by qqqq on March 29, 2002 at 10:18:31 PT
FoM
...dddd called....said to leave no comment other than to wish you and Kap Best wishes for Easter

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on March 29, 2002 at 09:55:33 PT
kapt
I knew you would comment or hoped you would. Ain't that the truth!

The fact is: Give me money that's what I want that's what I want that's what I want.

That's what they need 'money' and will do what will make them money to feed their families and that's reality.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by kaptinemo on March 29, 2002 at 09:47:44 PT:

Well, "duh!'
An ounce of cocaine fetches thousands of dollars. An ounce of coffee? Pennies. Seems antis are not only ignorant of history, they need to go back to grade school remedial classes for basic arithmetic as well. And these people run the country? More proof of the 'dumbing down of America'.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 29, 2002 at 08:24:13