Also from this interview with David Brock:

"Blinded by the Right" fills in and confirms the details, as Brock explains his own personal transformation from eager journalistic "hit man" to repentant confessor. In the process, we learn that even federal judges at the highest level were willing participants in the Clinton character assassination and entrapment strategy.

BuzzFlash believes Brock deserves our gratitude, not our scorn.

BuzzFlash.com recently interviewed Brock, beginning with the subject of Ted Olson. The Democrats allowed the confirmation of Ted Olson as Solicitor General, despite Brock's detailed account of Olson's role in the infamous "Arkansas Project."

BuzzFlash.com is offering "Blinded By The Right" as a BuzzFlash Premium: http://www.buzzflash.com/premiums/Blinded_By_The_Right.html

BUZZFLASH: In "Blinded by the Right, you recount that you were stunned when you went to talk with Ted Olson in D.C. (early on in the efforts to bring down Clinton), when he expressed to you that it was irrelevant whether Vince Foster had committed suicide or not. To Olson, raising questions about the Foster suicide was just another way of keeping the heat on the Clinton administration until a scandal could be shaken loose, which was the mission of the infamous Arkansas Project.

How does Ted Olson, now our Solicitor General (who is going to argue the White House case against the Government Accounting Office lawsuit against Cheney), symbolize the right-wing attack machine?

DAVID BROCK: I think in Ted's case, through the nineties, he led a kind of double life. On the one hand, he was the pinnacle of the legal establishment in Washington, not only on the conservative side. I think he's generally recognized as being at the top of his profession.

What no one outside the conservative world knew was the second role he was playing, which was as a kind of a consiglieri to the extreme right. And in particular, to the Arkansas Project, which was the two-million dollar smear campaign that was ran against the Clintons through the American Spectator, funded by Richard Mellon Scaife.

I think Scaife was and is the center of the anti-Clinton movement in the nineties in terms of financing a broad range of publications and legal interest groups. These institutions surreptitiously were getting money to advance the Paula Jones case, so Scaife had his fingers in everything. And Ted became more and more involved with the Spectator and with the Arkansas Project, which was, in some ways, inexplicable in the sense that it didn't seem to jibe with his other reputation. So he's an interesting character.

I think the other thing that's important about Ted is that the qualifications for Solicitor General are normally someone who is regarded as not a political partisan. They may have various ideological pre-dispositions, but would not have been the kind of person who was actively involved in trying to bring down the prior administration. He was in concert with his wife Barbara Olson, who was, at that time, one of the lead investigators on all the anti-Clinton scandals on Capitol Hill.

So together, Ted and Barbara sort of symbolize the kind of relentless pursuit and relentless disregard for the facts. And that's where the anecdote that I told about Ted and Vince Foster comes into play. I did meet a lot of people in Arkansas over the years whom seem to have deluded themselves into believing a lot of these crazy stories. And to me, they bordered on lunacy. But Ted is a sophisticated Washington lawyer.

Nonetheless, Ted Olson exemplifies the view that whether a particular article was credible or not, the allegations put forth were simply a process. That process was throwing out more and more dirt, in the hope that some of it would stick.

• It's the hypocrisy, stupid.

My point was to illustrate something: you can talk all you like to antis on a personal level...but they will always be antis. Because they cannot seperate the personal from the professional. Not when their egos become involved.

We've never met, and may never, but I can tell that you have a good and kind heart, and mean no one any harm. But I doubt very severely whether Joyce sees you that way. I can only guess from her statements and actions what is going through her mind, but at the risk of angering you, (I do not see you in this light, but would be willing to bet a quarter of my next paycheck that she does) I'll tell you what I think I see:

I can visualize someone (you) talking with Joyce, being open-minded and open-hearted...and I see her nodding and making all manner of neutral noises...while she continues to plot the destruction of the reform movement. Your attempt to speak to her on a human level is probably seen by her to be typical wishy-washy 'liberal weakness'...which she will exploit at the first opportunity. I have been on the short, sharp, and foul end of the stick these people stab us with, and know their kind all too well.

You have sought to try to treat Joyce as one human being reaching out to another. Exemplary conduct on your part. But consider: what possible reason does she have to talk with you, otherwise? She has repeatedly stated her intents...and, as I pointed out, she is still attacking on the reform movement. She hasn't changed. Not at all. Nor will she ever. Too much is at stake now, and she would never publicly admit that what she is doing is wrong from the git-go.

I realize how this sounds. I know that it sounds like the very extremism that antis are fond of exhibiting. But the ugly truth is they do see us as the enemy. And just because she does not make any overt expressions of a threatening nature in your phone conversations doesn't meant she wouldn't use her resources to destroy you...as she has destroyed an unknown number of people's lives with her support of the WoSD. Everything she does is geared to hurt us. Hurt you.

Years ago, before my own devastating brush with the FBI, I might have thought that there was a common ground to be reached, some kind of neutral territoty where decent people might come together and reasonably stop this madness. But I have had a first-hand taste of the absolute callosness of the DrugWarriors, who think nothing of ruining your life; they give more consideration as to what they are going to have for lunch that day than the effect that they have on the lives of the people they putatively serve. The only reason such as they have in communicating to us is either to make demands...or try to sucker us into doing something not in our best interests. Conversing with such as they is a waste of good oxygen.

Things have polarized to such an extent we are in a fight, not just to keep what few freedoms we have from being tattered any further, but our lives. Do anyone here honestly believe that Joyce cares at all about all the medicinal cannabis patients who've been forced to do without their medications since the California raids? As I keep saying, they were the ones who declared war on us...not the other way around. They don't care how many of us dies; they are actually quite happy when one of us does. One less goad for their almost non-existant consciences.

If they would call a truce, and seek a rational, peaceful end to this distructive conflict, I'd be overjoyed. But they have no intention to compromise. That one word - compromise - is worse than all the dirty words in the English language put together to them. She sees us as perverts, Martha. And in her eyes, you don't compromise you don't dialogue, you don't negotiate with perverts...only destroy them.

Dan Quayle has been the brunt of many jokes. I have told more than my share. He is, last I heard, for decrimilization of cannabis...

"Congress should definitely consider decriminalizing possession of marijuana... We should concentrate on prosecuting the rapists and burglars who are a menace to society."

Dan Quayle U.S. Representative and Vice president under President Bush March 1977

I recall seeing similar statements of more recent origen. Perhaps we should give him a break here...

My gut feeling is harsher towards Joyce, because I feel she wishes to do me personal harm, than towards our former hapless V.P., but, I hold no animosity towards her. I just wish she and her ilk would, in the words of old Deputy Dawg:

"Don't go away angry, just go away."

I don't believe that Joyce can grasp the enormity of the damage she and her ilk have done in their literal 'Children's Crusade'. It's her work in intimidating legislators (I am sure Joyce and company have a Nixonian 'Enemies List' of legislators they feel should 'watch their backs'.) that has brought us to the unenviable position of being the nation that has the highest number of it's own people behind bars than any other. How many cannabis prisoners have her to thank for her lobbying efforts in goading legislators to create ever higher punitive laws with the threat of the hoary epithet of being 'soft on drugs'?

Yes, Joyce 'likes' us, all right. Indeed she does. And she dreams of the day when we'll all be either behind bars or fled the country...to avoid being killed. By righteous do-gooders like Joyce...who truly 'know not what they do'.

Come on! Wake up! What would you do if your kid was on the street because he was not allowed to compete in sports or join any clubs? Think about it. You act as though you think that the message Souder and others are trying to send will keep students from trying drugs.

The WP's Outlook section has an interesting op-ed: "This year more than half a million babies in the developing world will contract from their mothers the virus that causes AIDS, despite the fact that drugs and therapies exist that could virtually eliminate mother-to-child transmission of the killer disease." The writer proposes that the U.S. hand out an additional $500 million this year to fight AIDS. The author? Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C.

Helms explains his newfound charitable mentality: He's still for a "very limited government." "But not all laws are of this earth. We also have a higher calling, and in the end our conscience is answerable to God. Perhaps, in my 81st year, I am too mindful of soon meeting Him."

"Mama, you are required by law to submit your piss."

Stuttering about, "But, sir, I have been working for 24 years as a prohibitionist."

"Mama, thanks to you but you are required to submit your piss."

"You know, it's a funny thing, every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish. What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob? What is the matter with them? I suppose it is because most of them are psychiatrists."
Richard Nixon missing tapes
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread12302.shtml

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."
From Benito Mussolini contributing to the "London Sunday Express," December 8, 1935

American High Society
http://www.pdxnorml.org/7_presidents.html

American High Society, a subchapter from "Hemp: Lifeline To The Future," by Chris Conrad.
Dr. Burke, president of the American Historical Reference Society and a consultant for the Smithsonian Institute, counted seven early presidents as cannabis smokers: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Zachary Taylor and Franklin Pierce. Madison once remarked that hemp gave him insight to create a new and democratic nation. Cannabis was twice as popular among American soldiers in the Mexican War as in Vietnam: Pierce wrote to his family that it was "about the only good thing" about that war.

Stepping Off Hard Drugs With Cannabis
http://www.potpride.com/steppingstone.htm

Random Indignities

http://reason.com/sullum/032202.shtml

Barry McCaffrey used to dismiss pain relief reports as anecdotal, yet the faces of young drug free kids was all the evidence he needed that D.A.R.E. was a program worth supporting, despite it's proven effect of increasing drug use among teens.

From:

In 1989 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a drug test requirement for anyone seeking a Customs Service position in which he would have to carry a gun, handle classified material, or participate in drug interdiction. Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, calling the testing program an "immolation of privacy and human dignity in symbolic opposition to drug use."

Scalia noted that the Customs Service policy required people to perform "an excretory function traditionally shielded by great privacy" while a monitor stood by, listening for "the normal sounds," after which "the excretion so produced [would] be turned over to the Government for chemical analysis." He deemed this "a type of search particularly destructive of privacy and offensive to personal dignity."

Six years later, Scalia considered a case* involving much the same procedure, this time imposed on randomly selected public school athletes. Writing for the majority, he said "the privacy interests compromised by the process of obtaining the urine sample are in our view negligible."

Not surprisingly, given its estimate of the stakes involved, the Court found that random drug testing of student athletes did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of "unreasonable searches and seizures." Now it seems poised to allow random testing of students who participate in any sort of competitive extracurricular activity, including debate, band, choir, cooking, and Future Farmers of America.

How hypocritical!

If we say, "There's an elephant in the living room.".....further study is needed to prove that there is, indeed, an elephant in the living room! Furthermore, any studies done will be to prove there is NOT an elephant in the living room! If they say it...it must be profoundly true.

These deaths you list are of course a terrible thing but I must ask: How many of these deaths could have been prevented if the "Slogan de Jour" had been Just Say Know instead of Just Say No! How many people would have still been alive if the drugs that they chose to use were certified uncontaminated because they had been inspected like any other drug offered for sale in a regulated and controlled marketplace?

Sooner or later even those people whose minds have been pinched shut due to mental constipation will be forced to realize that drug use has alway been with us, always will be with us, and no amount of wishing will change ever change the truth!

Dear Lady, please keep up your efforts because the more outlandish your rhetoric is the easier our job becomes.

That's what happened to Naomi Judd. She was a nurse and was accidentally stuck by an infected needle and contracted Hepatitis C.

The Effect of Alcohol Prohibition on Illicit Drug Related Crimes:

June 26, 2001
Abstract

Ambulance officers in Victoria are beginning a trial that could save the lives of heroin addicts who've overdosed. In a world first, officers will today begin giving addicts the heroin antidote Narcan using a nasal spray instead of an injection. The nasal spray acts more quickly than an injection, thus potentially saving lives and it could soon be administered by drug counsellors and even family members in cases of overdose.

Rafael Epstein reports.

RAFAEL EPSTEIN: It's a scene played out on the streets of most of our major cities almost everyday. An overdosed heroin addict being treated by ambulance officers..

AMBULANCE OFFICER: I'm still concerned that he hasn't woken up adequately and his pupils are still pinpoint. His breathing effort is slowly coming back but it's not adequate to sustain life. I'll give him a little bit more Narcan and wake him up.

QUESTION: How close to death is he do you think?

AMBULANCE OFFICER: Ah, 2 to 3 minutes.

RAFAEL EPSTEIN: Narcan is an antidote to heroin cancelling out most of the ill effects of the street drug. Narcan injections often save lives but using Narcan in a nasal spray works a lot quicker, meaning an addict has a better chance of regaining consciousness.

Professor Anne-Marie Kelly from Western Hospital says there are benefits for ambulance officers as well.

ANNE-MARIE KELLY: Currently in Victoria we mostly give the antidote by getting it into the muscle, actually, and that takes usually about 5 or 8 minutes to work. Our preliminary work in the hospital suggests that by giving it into the nose it may work faster, maybe in as short a time as two minutes, which obviously decreases the amount of time that somebody's not breathing very well.

There's an advantage to the ambulance staff, in particular. A number of people who inject drugs carry blood born diseases such as Hepatitis C and because of the types of places that people overdose in, there's a risk that ambulance officers can get stuck with needles that have been contaminated and therefore are at risk of catching things like Hepatitis C. Obviously the intra-nasal route doesn't involve a needle and therefore that risk to ambulance staff is completely eliminated.

RAFAEL EPSTEIN: The trial is jointly run by the Metropolitan and Rural Ambulance Services working with researchers at the Western Hospital and St Vincent's Hospital. It'll be run at 13 ambulance stations, those who often see overdose victims, sometimes as many as 30 a day across the state.

ANNE-MARIE KELLY: The real reason to give it by the nasal spray route is that if it works, we can extend the number of people who can actually give the antidote, perhaps to community workers, other emergency workers, maybe even to peers or family members.

RAFAEL EPSTEIN: And that too could eliminate the need to wait for an ambulance. Trial results are expected in 2 to 4 months.

QUESTION: How are you?

HEROIN OVERDOSE VICTIM: I'm very well, thank you.

QUESTION: What do you remember happened?

HEROIN OVERDOSE VICTIM: Well I had some heroin.

QUESTION: Right.

HEROIN OVERDOSE VICTIM: And I don’t remember what happened to the rest of it.

QUESTION: Yeah.

HEROIN OVERDOSE VICTIM: And now I'm very depressed and I'm tripping. It feels all right.

QUESTION: Right.

HEROIN OVERDOSE VICTIM: Bit scary.

LINDA MOTTRAM: A heroin overdose victim on the streets of Melbourne. Rafael Epstein prepared that report.

I am not saying that abuse of drugs is a negligible medical problem, but it pales by comparison to the morbidity and mortality of the alcohol and nicotine.

The 10 top reasons why the Supreme Court should vote to support student drug testing:

Adam, 18, deceased.
Mark, 24, deceased.
Garrett, 22, deceased.
David, 26, deceased.
Billy, 17, deceased.
Cooper, 22, deceased.
Ian, 21, deceased.
Angela, 18, deceased.
Michael, 22, deceased.
Stephanie, 19, deceased.

The parents of these young people believe their children might still be living had their school systems supported their parental message of "no drugs" by drug testing the students.

Seven of the 10 died of heroin overdoses, two died from cocaine, and one died in a drug-related accident. All of their parents believe the children started drug use by smoking marijuana.

According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), more than 16,000 young people die of drug overdoses every year. ONDCP conducted a study of more than 2 million death certificates and determined that the total number of drug-related deaths exceeds 50,000.

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently hearing a school drug testing case to determine if schools are required to show drug and alcohol use before testing. We believe that public schools should not be required to show drug or alcohol use by students prior to implementing random testing. We believe the need to deter drug use by all students and protect their safety is cause enough to uphold random drug testing.

Recently, Congress included a provision (Section 4115) in the Education Bill to allow states and local jurisdictions to use Safe and Drug-Free Schools funds for student drug testing.

Other reasons for student drug testing would include: violence, dropouts, school underachievement, teen pregnancy, teacher safety, classroom disruption, keeping drug dealers off school property, and the expense of supporting "alternative schools" to educate drug-using students (Fairfax County operates more than 30 alternative schools to accommodate students with drug, alcohol and various delinquent problems).

JOYCE NALEPKA
President
Drug-Free Kids: America's Challenge
Silver Spring

Very Orwellian, indeed, this has become. Here, her truth is exposed as a lie. The truth about cannabis is buried, not even there in the 'real' world, '1984'. The information disseminated about cannabis propagates lies.

Lies become truth and truth wills out. Here in the real world, the truth is awfully sick and tired about all of the lies it's been hearing about it.

It's schizophrenic and strange. No wonder people drink, they're driven to it. Pavlovian experience drives them to distraction. They're lost sheep wandering in the wilderness, the wolves are licking their lamb chops.

Have a nice day, Joyce. Go out and have a little fun today. If you happen to try a little marijuana, good for you.

"Evil is the unconscious or unintended transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Evil is likewise the measure of the imperfectness of obedience to the Father's will.

"Sin is the conscious, knowing, and deliberate transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Sin is the measure of unwillingness to be divinely led and spiritually directed.

"Iniquity is the willful, determined, and persistent transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Iniquity is the measure of the continued rejection of the Father's loving plan of personality survival and the Sons' merciful ministry of salvation.

Jesus A.D.28

Perhaps Joyce runs her mouth so much that she has been given the nod to run it, to see if she gets bombarded... Then the drug (well, plant realy) war lords get a good feel for which way to attack... If she is supported... they will bombard the "militant" cannabis activist??? But what if Joyce gets bombarded,,, WHAT WILL THEY DO, next...? THAT IS WHAT WE NEED TO BE READY FOR!

An exelent oppertunity for us, its only challenge is to comment on sooo much evil, instead of one or 2, perticulars.

Devil with blue dress blue dress blue dress, devil with the blue dress on.

As a 24-year veteran in the effort to educate... (actually jailate)

marijuana and other drugs,... Joyce is saying education, but her actions = jail, not education.... A deluding influence refers to a plant given to us by our Father as Drug...

...about as uncompassionate as possible including Biblically. She has no concern if cannabis has wonder drug implications or not. She wants you caged no matter...

Sir Joyce’s absent mindedness, forgot to mention, Students for Sensible Drug Policy’s ploy which is to bring credible law into focus, so that it is not ignorant to give education grant money to murderers and rapist, but not someone charged for a cannabis infraction...

She lacks any debate potential, since the debate means death to her and all the evil she stands for. (Very militant of us)

Her choice of the word militant is confusing since it is the government (wiht her evil -sinfull blessings) that has shot down Christian mercenaries and uses SWAT to arrest cannabis users, with instant death sentences delivered...to even the innocent... as opposed to the ammo of speech in the form of Truth. Maybe it is militant Truth, Joyce speaks about...and fears!!!!&!

I suggest that Joyce’ efforts have brought America more harm than good and when we set aside the notion of jailing our way out of this problem, and refer to it as educating our way... we will help America back onto it’s course of righteousness...

You will have to look hard to see a more disredited viewpoint than what Joyce is selling...

America has enough hate mongers and drug war lords...

Joyce has more backward thinking than a caboose when it thinks it is going foward.

Would you want your child or grandchild to end up in a dorm room with a non-rehabilitated drug criminal? (It is ok, though, to share with a rapist, Joyce?)

Joyce, Joyce, Joyce, You make my day easier. A Blessing I thank Our Father for. For through His guidance You are His bull-eye.

Prohibitionist are like slugs and through our Father they shall be salted with the words from the Wise.

2 Thessalonians 2 = the deluding influence, exposed (perspective). ONe of the effects of Joyce's efforts is helping seperate souls from the Holy Spirit of Truth.

The computer with out wires...The Holy Spirit of Truth.

I will help gather what you and your evil have scattered.

Comment #1 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on October 16, 2000 at 08:08:20 PT:

Joyce Nalepka proves herself to be suffering from two serious diseases: rabid exaggeration with terminal misinformation. The only thing correct in her assertions are the quotations to my knowledge. I'd love to debate her on a national talk program sometime. It would be nice to ask her to prove her assertions. I can, thanks to the 800 articles and 40 books I've read on the subject of cannabis the last 4 years. All she has is a bunch of propaganda. That does not represent proof in my book.

I'll take on one of her points, which is more than she has done for me, despite the fact I answered each and every objection completely, backed up by science and literature, thanks in no small part to Dr. Russo's and FoM's heroic efforts.

As parents, we would treat membership in SSDP as firmly as we would treat drug use. Stop the behavior and resign from the group or pay your own tuition.

Then study, use the internet to help you find more information, shop at Goodwill and get two part time jobs to support your education. Those who would knowingly suppress your knowledge and lie to do so deserve to be excluded from participating any further in your life.

In researching the truth about cannabis, I found a 1941 copy of the Popular Mechanics article that interviewed Henry Ford and showed the strength and versatility of the plant he suggested farmers could grow to supply the raw materials and fuels for his cars. I also found a 1939 issue of Nielsen's Shipping Guide, which made it clear that cannabis (and ganja) were once standard commodities, even though they never appear in my history books.

Now that Nxon's tapes are public, we know the truth about his rejection of the Shaffer commission report that recommended decriminalization. The tapes prove that marijuana has been immorally suppressed, and laws against the use of cannabis were enacted under pressure from those like Joyce who disingenuously pretend marijuana is poison while turning a blind eye to the fact that legal substances kill, while cannabis heals. They ignore science that proves them wrong, and actively avoid debate, perhaps because they know they will be proved wrong. As long as we challenge them wherever they spew their Nazi/KKK type propaganda, the public can see the difference. Even a dog knows whether it has just been kicked, or just tripped over.

Souder is a raving idiot. Politics is choked with idiots like him. He comes from the same rich soil as Danny Quayle.

(actually, so do I,...but I had the sense to move.)

They hold government positions great and small; the screw up everything in thier reach.

They are white, mean, prejudiced,joyce:dull-witted, disingenious people who, like gameshow or talkshow hosts, have few other talents in life to fall back on. Control of others is all there is.

And I finally see who the Joyce Nalepka is that people here refer to so often. Sort of an Anita Bryant or Dear Abby sort, eh?

The groups also cause the unnecessarily increased risk of the risk takers that they will be taking a grossly adulterated drug or one that is not what they intended to use at all.

Prohibitionists are also backed by various men's and women's clubs, so called "civic" groups, luncheon ladies, social clubs, and society matrons who need something to do while the nanny raises the children, as well as industries and groups that profit from the illegality of drugs.

Very often they are applauded by law enforcement that, trampling all over the Constitution of these great United States in the falsely hallowed name of the war on drugs, are allowed to seize property from citizens without benefit of trial or conviction and buy all the high tech toys and get to do "fun stuff" and have expense accounts that the public would never otherwise allow them, instead of "drudge work" like looking for everyday thieves, hard to find murderers, and rapists.

To an even greater extent groups like Nalepka's are backed by drug traffickers, who know that the more successful prohibitionist groups there are, the higher the profits and the more secure their illegal trade is.

These prohibitionist groups encourage citizens to spy on their neighbors and turn them over to government officials if they believe they might be using or helping anyone else to use drugs.

Prohibitionists regularly defy logic in the name of their war on drugs. It is not uncommon for them to use demonizing tactics in attacking those they perceive as their enemies.

Of course, the manufacturers of drug war paraphernalia and related industries, such as prison, forced treatment providers, drug testers, and munitions providers back the militant prohibitionist groups who are, in fact, always zealously recruiting people into their associations with either big lies and flattery about how wonderful and good and right it is to be a prohibitionist or by bullying them into believing they should be ashamed if they disagree with the prohibitionist point of view.

They share a mutual fund raising racket with politicians. They raise funds for the politician's campaigns and the politician sees that they receive hefty grants. The prohibitionist groups and their leaders spend a lot of time "toasting", "applauding", flattering, and promoting politicians who allocate them huge sums of grant money and will often give speeches at the meetings the groups have to add to their imagined glory and, hopefully, accentuate how "important" the groups are.

These groups are actually wolves parading around in sheep's clothing. The sheep's clothing has extensive deep and enlarged, yet relatively concealed, pockets for storing funds.

This woman has CLEARLY gone over the edge. Since she can't reason with adults, she's attacking the students. Sounds like she is tremendously afraid ole Sauder is on his way out. Does she realize he is not the only one threatened by their SENSELESS adhearance to the Drug*War hypocracy and destruction of Liberty in America?

"If you wonder how students finance their participation and air travel to these various conferences or meetings to harass elected officials who, in Souder's case, have the interest of both the kids and his constituents at heart, visit their pro-drug Web site." I say, neither Joyce nor Mark, have EITHER of groups interest at heart. And I am a Constituent. Just not one of his.

On election day, we need to take off work, round up as many Freedom/Liberty/Constitution loving people we can get in our cars, and Vote the change in. Won't happen any other way. Peaceful, that is.

for more background see: http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/5/thread5040.shtml#2 http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/5/thread5122.shtml#13 http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/5/thread5197.shtml#4 etc.

Joyce Nalepka has no shame, and waves her delusional thinking like a banner for the world to see.

If you would realize that your pain is our pain (we do feel the pain and fear when your kids use chemicals they should not use, esp. if harm results) and our pain is your pain, you would feel a lot better about yourself and the world around you.

Peace be with you, Joyce,

To my regret I must conclude she is either a liar or a fool. Maybe even both.

Any reasonable person can today find their way to the truth if they're willing to make any kind of effort at all.