Cannabis News Cannabis TV
  U.S. May Up Ante in Colombia
Posted by FoM on March 21, 2002 at 14:25:31 PT
By Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times 
Source: Washington Times 

justice The Bush administration has drafted plans to expand its military role in Colombia from counterdrug training to anti-terrorism as well. The policy shift, which comes in the form of proposed legislation, could require as many as 100 additional American troops to be sent into the civil war-torn South American country.

Colombia is now engaged in a fight for its democratic survival against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, a well-funded, left-wing guerrilla force.

Colombian President Andres Pastrana's decision last month to go to war against the FARC after three years of fruitless peace talks prompted administration policy-makers to look for ways to offer help beyond counternarcotics missions. U.S. law and a Clinton administration directive limit aid to anti-drug efforts only.

A draft plan shows the administration will ask Congress to describe counternarcotics activities as including anti-terrorism and other threats to Colombian security. An official said that as of yesterday the White House had not approved the final language.

In practice, however, the terms are a "distinction without a difference," said a senior administration official, because the FARC is also a U.S.-designated terrorist group and is deeply involved in the production and shipment of cocaine and heroin.

The White House could submit its new Colombia plan to Congress as early as this week and fund the missions through a current-year emergency budget bill.

The plan will have two main components:

• Begin using Army Special Forces (Green Berets) and other personnel to train the Colombian military in anti-terror tactics, in the same way soldiers are training the Philippines army to engage the terrorist group Abu Sayyaf. This would require an increase in U.S. troop presence by as many as 100. The administration would maintain a ban on American troops directly participating in combat.

• Allow an existing Colombian anti-narcotics brigade, financed and trained by the United States, to get involved in directly fighting the FARC.

The administration already has asked Congress for $98 million to set up a new brigade that would protect some of Colombia's vital infrastructure, such as oil pipelines and power lines, that are a favorite target of the FARC and the National Liberation Army (ELN), a much smaller guerrilla group.

Some policy-makers would also like to set up a third brigade strictly for anti-terror operations.

Current policy limits the number of military trainers in Colombia to 400. There are no plans to ask for a higher limit, officials said. There are 250 American troops in Colombia, 50 Defense Department civilians and 100 contractors, some of whom operate aircraft that spray herbicide on Colombian coca fields.

One U.S. official said the administration will seek to sell the package as, "This is the Colombian war on terrorism. This is not the next phase in the fight against global terrorism."

White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer uttered that policy during Tuesday's press briefing. "The situation with the FARC involved a group that is listed by the State Department as a terrorist group," he said. "I don't think it's fair to say that FARC has global reach."

That approach has disappointed some on Capitol Hill. They view the FARC as qualifying as an enemy under President Bush's declared war on terrorist groups with "global reach."

"ELN and the FARC in the past 10 years have kidnapped 50 Americans and killed 10 of them," said a House aide. "This is a national security threat right in our back door."

The staffer said Colombian-produced heroin and cocaine "have probably taken more lives every year than [Osama] bin Laden took on September 11. It's global reach of the vast magnitude that is taking American lives."

Also, the Colombian military reports that Basque and Irish terrorists, along with Cuban and Iranian representatives, have operated in a Switzerland-size safe zone the FARC controlled in Colombia until Mr. Pastrana ended peace talks.

The staffer said that for the new Colombia policy to be effective it must include helicopter transports that can take troops to the FARC's mountain encampments.

"Colombia is bigger than Kansas and Texas combined," the aide said. "There is only one fundamental way to fight: it's mobility. You have to be able to move in the Andes where the guerrillas operate and the only way you do this is helicopters."

A Clinton directive, Presidential Decision Directive 73, and appropriations bill language, limit U.S. military training to counter-narcotics.

The administration is so scrupulous about following the law that U.S. Southern Command, based in Miami, is prevented from sharing with Colombia's government certain intelligence on FARC locations and operations. Those limits would change under the new Bush policy.

Source: Washington Times (DC)
Author: Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times
Published: March 21, 2002
Copyright: 2002 News World Communications, Inc.
Website: http://www.washtimes.com/
Contact: letters@washingtontimes.com

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

Ashcroft Renews War on Drug Trade
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12295.shtml

Some Democrats Wary of Bush's Colombia Aid Plan
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12291.shtml

Get Out of Colombia - Congressman Ron Paul MD
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12206.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #3 posted by qqqq on March 22, 2002 at 07:41:30 PT
...classic title for this article!...
...."Uppin the ante",,,,,what?,,as if it were somehow like a poker game!!!,,,as if the next thing you hear would be ;;;.."I'll see your Colombia,,,and raise you an Ecuador!"......."well,,,I'll see your Ecuador and raise you a Bolivia" ..later on,,in the wee hours of the morning,,,the akward truth hits home!....Yes,,,you lost Paraguay in a card game,,,and you used Uraguay for collateral,,and to make things worse,,you lied,and said that you owned that huge iceberg that just broke off of Antarctica

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by dddd on March 22, 2002 at 06:17:52 PT
wow CannabisCrusader...
..I have never heard of the Data Quality Act,,,but I believe it probably exsists,,....how silly though...I think they passed the Data Quality Act,as part of 'Account for every Penny of the Citizens Tax Money' bill,,,,,I'd sooner trust Daryl Strawberry with a crackpipe and my teenage daughter,,,on an overnite date in a Winnabego,,,than I would trust enforcement of a Data Quality Act!...after all,,,,I think that it is quite strange,,that no real "law enforcement" exsists for most of the white collar laws that are passed,,,you know,,there was no cop assigned to Kenneth Lay,after he obviously was part of a scheme to rip off Millions from unsuspecting Sheeple!...If ya ask me,,,assholes like this Lay shithead are the ones who should be SWAT teamed down on the marble floor of their mansion,,along with their wife and kids,,,now that we be a great new cops type show,,where they bust wealthy swindlers....it could be hosted by Robin Leach..."Busts of the Rich and Famous".....dddd

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by Cannabis Crusader on March 21, 2002 at 14:51:46 PT
has anyone...
heard of the Data Quality Act? I'm not sure, but this may be a savior for the cannabis liberation movement. Based on what I have read, it is supposed to "control the reliability and “objectivity” of information disseminated by the federal government," which includes propagandist like the DEA and the ONDCP. The next step is for every federal agency to publish by May 1 how it will implement the law. This may limit, or even better, expose the bogus studies that the DEA and ONDCP continue to cite as their justification for destroying the lives of hundred of thousands innocent cannabis smokers every year.



[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 21, 2002 at 14:25:31