Cannabis News Media Awareness Project
  Elder Bush Aids Fight Against Drugs at Work
Posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 07:16:18 PT
By Christine L. Romero, The Arizona Republic 
Source: Arizona Daily Star  

justice Former President Bush told about 500 people in Scottsdale on Monday that the fight against drugs in the workplace could help exterminate terrorism.

The annual fund-raiser for the non-profit group Drugs Don't Work in Arizona will help businesses set up programs aimed at banishing use of drugs and heavy drinking. That could help increase profits, since drug and alcohol abusers can cause accidents and loss of productivity.

"Drugs Don't Work isn't a liberal or a conservative or a Democrat or Republican idea," Bush said at the Phoenician resort. "It's just a good idea."

The group gave him an inaugural award, named in his honor, for his efforts. Channel 12 (KPNX-TV), which is owned by The Arizona Republic's parent firm, Gannett Co. Inc., was among Monday's luncheon sponsors.

The current Bush administration recently boosted the war on drugs and terrorism with $10 million for ads saying drug purchases support terrorism. Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida network, the ads say, benefited from Taliban control of Afghanistan's poppy crop, from which much of the world's heroin is derived.

In addition, drug use costs businesses nationwide between $60 billion and $140 billion annually, according to Partnership for a Drug Free America, the national umbrella group for private anti-drug efforts.

About 87 percent of the nation's large companies, with more than 500 employees, test for drugs, and the law mandates testing for transportation workers and companies with federal contracts.

But fewer than 20 percent of drug users and heavy drinkers work for the big companies. That leaves small firms, which don't usually test, most vulnerable, the Labor Department reports. Some in the drug-testing industry are trying to change this.

Drugs Don't Work in Arizona, part of the National Drugs Don't Work Partnership, targets small businesses. It says seven out of 10 drug users are employed.

"It's good in the workplace, and good at 5 o'clock," said Susan Jones, executive director of the organization in Arizona. "It makes drug-free parents and citizens."

Critics say the program is hypocritical since it relies, in part, on contributions from tobacco and alcohol producers. Other big contributors include the makers of prescription drugs and genetically modified seeds.

Stopping hard-core drug abuse isn't as easy as the Bushes makes it seem, said Keith Stroup, founder and executive director of Washington, D.C.-based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. Rather than from terrorists, much of the nation's heroin comes from Mexico, while most of its marijuana is home-grown or is imported from Canada, Mexico or Jamaica, he said.

Stroup says many American adults use marijuana recreationally like they do alcohol, and it should be handled with the same care. But he said pot smokers shouldn't be treated the same as hard-drug users.

"The average marijuana smoker is just as hard working," Stroup said. "If you drink alcohol and smoke tobacco that's terribly dangerous. (By keeping them out of the workforce) we are needlessly destroying the lives and careers of many hard-working Americans."

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who spoke at Monday's event, countered that the Taliban has directly profited from drugs, especially opium.

"It's ruining lives. Whether they are American lives or not," Kyl said.

About a year ago, Lorraine Bergman, president of Mesa-based Caliente Construction, started an anti-drug program for her 20 employees with help from Drugs Don't Work in Arizona. She estimates the start-up costs at $1,000.

"I don't see why any small business wouldn't have it," Bergman said. "When the (drug) tests come back positive, I'm glad I found out. I feel a lot more comfortable, and the employees value it."

Murray Lappe started one of first workplace drug-testing firms in the early 1980s. As the chairman of eScreen Inc., a Kansas-based company that makes rapid-result drug tests, he sees more small businesses like Caliente wanting inexpensive, fast and reliable tests.

Source: Arizona Daily Star (AZ)
Christine L. Romero, The Arizona Republic
Published: March 19, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Pulitzer Publishing Co.
Contact: letters@azstarnet.com
Website: http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/

Related Article & Web Site:

NORML
http://www.norml.org/

Anti-Drug Efforts Might Be Helping Terrorists
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12225.shtml

CannabisNews Drug Testing Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/drug_testing.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #25 posted by goneposthole on March 20, 2002 at 11:56:22 PT
That's 'arm'
I get carried away with my keyboarding. Schucks

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #24 posted by goneposthole on March 20, 2002 at 11:52:02 PT
Who Decides?
First row, first seat, armed stretched high, fingers wiggling, the first enthusiastic volunteer to do the re-tooling.

Why, it's Joyce.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by kaptinemo on March 20, 2002 at 11:27:59 PT:

Social Engineering redux
From soem comments I made in past times:

http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/4/thread4957.shtml

Ham-handed social engineering They want to prevent students from buying 'drugs' with federal money.

BCG, this is a lot more than that. It is the logical conclusion of a process that began with urine testing in the 80's. Because the antis really meant it when they said they wanted a 'DrugFree Society'.

What you see happening is an interesting twist; those nations governed by a supposed Conservative majority are actually controlled by a tightly organized Conservative minority with the blessings of the corporations they see as role models. Okay, I can hear someone say, nothing new there. But the original definition of a conservative was a person who conserved individual rights and liberties from encroachment by a social-engineering liberal minority using the power of the State to acomplish it's goals.

Now it is the so-called Conservatives who have taken upon themselves the machinery of social engineering and are using the power of the State to further *their* goals. Doing exactly what they accused Liberals of doing for so long. They know the last holdouts are the campuses, where you are still (after a fashion) allowed to think rather than to react. They want to try to ensure that only those they think of as ideologically pure will matriculate. This is one way of doing it.

And a bit more: http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/5/thread5780.shtml

Social engineers...Left and Right One of the things the electronic mouthpieces of the Rabid Radio Right often blather and shriek about (until you'd think they'd die on-the-air of apoplexy) is 'social engineering'. "Women in the military". "Civil Rights". Such matters as these. They fuliminate, they gibber, and it's a good thing you aren't in the studio with them, because you'd be soaking wet from all the flying spittle. Yes sir, they hate the idea of 'social engineering'...unless it's their precious War on (Some) Drugs. Then, it's all hunkey-dorey with them.

'Angela Flood, a spokesperson for Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., who sponsored the legislation, said the provision will help ensure a healthier learning environment. "[Financial aid] is a privilege, not a right," she said'

Yes, only the pure of chromosomes shall pass through the groves of academia. Free from the taint of thinking for themsalves and doubting what they've been taught (like the lies told to them by the DARE officer). Safe from the temptation of chemically-catalyzed thought processes (which are responsible for such advances as modern electronics, computers, and the DNA tests that cops love to use so much) which might cause them to wander from the True Faith of the Church of The Right and the Gospel of Saint Nancy. Yes, like fresh modelling clay, they shall be moulded into razor sharp middle managers for the coming Global Plantation which will be the ultimate result of Globalization. Sing the corporate anthem with pride! Hallelujah!

These goofs almost never realize the depths of their own hypocrisy, and certainly never are able to put two and two together. No matter how screamingly obvious it is, they will never admit that, they, too, are dabbling in the very same 'black arts' that they accuse the Left of engaging in. Social engineering of any sort is the precursor to tyranny; just ask any Jew who survived Hitler's Germany and he'll tell you: it started in schools, first. Demanding unity of thought and action, and if you didn't fit in... well, we all know what happened to the 'misfits'.

"Social Engineering," eh? And just who decides you'll be...'retooled'?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by ekim on March 19, 2002 at 21:08:05 PT:

A Challenge to Federal Law Regarding Marijuana Sch
Forum" MEDIA ADVISORY For Tuesday, March 19

Is Marijuana Really As Addictive As Heroin?

A Challenge to Federal Law Regarding Marijuana Scheduling to be Heard by the District of Columbia Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals on Tuesday, March 19th, at 9:30 am

Marijuana is considered equal to heroin and worse than cocaine -- in terms of abuse potential and lack of medicinal value, according to current federal law. It is a "Schedule I" drug, meaning it has a "high potential for abuse" and "no accepted medical use". This classification is preventing many AIDS, cancer and other patients from legal access to marijuana as medicine.

On Tuesday March 19 this scheduling will be challenged in the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals. The Court is being asked to order the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to consider additional research and testimony in their scientific and medical evaluation of marijuana. This challenge is being brought to the Court by Jon Gettman, Ph.D., and High Times magazine, who argue that marijuana does not have a "high potential for abuse" and does have accepted medical use for people with certain illnesses.

Specifically, Gettman and High Times are asking the Court to order DEA and HHS to hold public hearings to consider the testimony of patients, doctors, and state health officials from jurisdictions that have accepted medical marijuana use under state law.

According to petition researcher Gettman: "Eight states and the District of Columbia have recognized the medicinal value of marijuana and almost every state distinguishes marijuana from narcotics; but the federal government still classifies this drug as equal in danger to cocaine and heroin, thus prohibiting potential beneficiaries from access and obstructing its development.. High Times and I are asking the court to put an end to this charade."



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by ekim on March 19, 2002 at 20:49:52 PT:

LTE Kal.Gazette Mar. 10 --02
When I was asked by the U.S.A. Government to go fight the spread of Communism in Viet Nam in the 60s I went served and luckily came home. I felt we had as we were told,safeguarded our most precious freedoms from the Red Scare. In the 80s we saw the Wall being torn down in Germany and felt good for those people. I am troubled now at seeing our freedoms vanishing before me. I watch as hundreds of paper making jobs leave Kalamazoo, and as farmers struggle to make ends meet. I see W.M.U. teaching paper making and not being allowed to make paper with Hemp. As Canada and 30 other countries are allowing there farmers to grow and nourish there citizens with its rich seeds and oil. My country the DEA in particular has banned all Hemp seeds and oil for human beings. I watch as 9 States have voted for Medical Marijuana, two weeks ago the DEA blew open two Cannabis care clubs in San Francisco and arrested the Countries leading experts on growing this Herb. I have worked within the system to change the laws on Cannabis. Last year we here in Michigan collected 288,000 signatures for the personal use of cannabis for adults over 21 yrs old. It was a all voluntary effort. I watched as two activists at Rainbow Farm were shot to death over this issue. Now I see that the W.M.U. Research Park will be the future site of the largest drug testing company in the country. Testing samples extracted from companies workers for the good of the state. What are we doing acting like the Communist countries we have said are evil. Now the drug war has been merged with the other war this is wrong. No reasonable person can make the argument that Cannabis is fueling terror on the contrary the war against some drugs is fueling terror on our own citizens. I will work within the system as Congressman Bonior has said he is for the Med.use of Cannabis. Mike Dooley Delton MI

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #20 posted by goneposthole on March 19, 2002 at 19:28:08 PT
The killing of a life
I have been told that depression is anger turned within.

In an American city, at a local bar, a patron was drinking an alcoholic beverage.

He unholstered his 9mm handgun, placed it to his head and pulled the trigger.

Patrons left the bar without the coats and jackets that got splattered with blood.

The suicide victim was also a DEA agent.

Another victim of the drug war?

Tired of a job that ruined lives?

There is corruption in anything, and everything about the US Government is corrupt.

The drug war is hopeless. There is nothing Mr. Ashcroft or anyone else can do to change it.

End it.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 18:00:01 PT
Ashcroft Announces New Anti-Drug Initiative
Calling for more accountability in the war on drugs, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced a new federal effort Tuesday to stem the flow of illegal narcotics into the United States.

"In an era in which we know more than ever before about the ravages of drug abuse, surrender is not -- and cannot be -- an option," Ashcroft said at a news conference. "At a time when we see clearly the evil interdependence between the terrorists that kill American lives and the illegal drugs that steal American potential, surrender to either of these threats is surrender to both."

Snipped

Complete Article: http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/19/ashcroft.drugs/index.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 13:01:21 PT
i420
My husband was drug testing 3 times in one year. Two were randoms. It's time consuming and not at all appreciated by us or his boss. When he drug tests he loses a whole days work and there isn't any compensation for it either.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #17 posted by i420 on March 19, 2002 at 12:57:09 PT
We R not FREE
The trucking industry has a shortage of drivers... it seems no one wants to p in the cup. Last place I worked that did random can't keep employees and has had to close 1 or 2 of it's lines. I am sure there are still accidents there... it wasn't potheads that were always getting hurt.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #16 posted by Sam Adams on March 19, 2002 at 11:53:16 PT
Good to see ol' George in the headlines again....
Gives us an opportunity once again to thank him for leaving Saddam "worse than Hitler" Hussein in power so that more of our young men can die over there.

Good to see he's against drugs and alcohol - maybe that's why his son was only a cocaine addict for 20 years, and is now only an alcoholic that drinks till he passes out (pretzel?)



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by goneposthole on March 19, 2002 at 11:04:33 PT
social engineering
It more or less will eliminate freedom of choice.

People would be drunk all of the time or on some kind of substance.

The need for genetically modified humans programmed to work their 'occupation' day in and day out with no need to question their 'lot' would be a perfect solution. Propaganda would be obsolete. Trained pidgeons picking the colors.

Hooray for social engineering. The brain would become a vestigial organ.

Eureka, utopia.

Going home would become a thing of the past, sleeping on a cot next to your work spot would suffice.

Drugs don't work ain't gonna work, sorry. It's not Democrat, Republican, conservative or liberal. It's insane.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by The GCW on March 19, 2002 at 10:56:45 PT
Perspective
US CO: PUB LTE: Hippie War http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n480/a03.html?7116

Simplistically put: There is a strong chance that the Earth is on the brink of one of the worst catastrophes of natural history, and it may be within the power of human kind to prevent, or at least limit, the severity of this occurrence. The social group most active and committed to this endeavor is the hippies. Unfortunately, this group is chained down by the fact that most of its members can, perfectly legally, be imprisoned and/or have their property stolen at anytime, without a trial.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by Patrick on March 19, 2002 at 10:51:14 PT
Russia our new best friend
Is it any wonder? The next big prison construction push will probably be in the Alaskan wildlife area. This way the current powers that be can take advantage of all that free drug user/terrorist labor to drill for more oil in the 21st century american gulag state I mean prison system.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 10:31:22 PT
No Question There EJ
Our earth is getting destroyed.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #11 posted by Toker00 on March 19, 2002 at 09:59:47 PT
Ditto, E-Johnson.
The parallels are UNMISTAKABLE.

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by MikeEEEEE on March 19, 2002 at 09:52:55 PT
prohibition is only part of it
Besides the suffering caused by prohibition, the anti's are causing a lot more damage than we think, and it's happening on a global scale.
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/World/Global_Warming/

We should switch to hemp but tell that to the Bush oil cartel.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by E_Johnson on March 19, 2002 at 09:47:09 PT
Extreme leftist social engineering By Repubs?
Isn't this what the Republicans call extreme leftist social engineering when Democrats or Communists try to do it?

This idea that employees are responsible to their employers in their private lives is both ridiculous and highly dangerous.

This was how Marxism worked. The USSR was based on the welfare of the workers, right?

No, it was based on control of the workers. The USSR system controlled workers completely.

Their private behavior was linked to their job and their political standing with the Communist Party and hence with the government.

That is how to have a society that is not free -- build strong inescapable unbreakable links between private life, employment and government.

That's how Lenin and Stalin envisioned their blueprint for a Communist future, and that is how Republican and Democrat drug warriors in America see the future of this country as well.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by Jose Melendez on March 19, 2002 at 09:32:45 PT:

Follow the money, part 2

From:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/kreca1.html

The Navy tested mescaline as part of its 1947-53 Project CHATTER. MK-ULTRA was first organized in 1949 by Richard Helms under the direction of Allen Dulles as Project BLUEBIRD. Two years later, it was renamed ARTICHOKE (after one of Dulles?s favorite foods) then termed MK-ULTRA in 1953, finally becoming MK-SEARCH in 1965 until the program's "official termination" eight years later. MK-ULTRA was directly responsible for the wide underground availability of LSD, phencyclidine (PCP - also called "angel dust"), dimethyltryptamine (DMT), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (STP) and other powerful synthetic psychoactive drugs in the 1960s. In the early 1950s, the CIA and the Army had contacted Sandoz requesting several kilograms of LSD for use in the test program.

Dr. Hofmann and Sandoz refused this request, so Director Dulles persuaded the Indianapolis-based pharmaceutical luminary Eli Lilly (later the pioneers of and chief cheerleaders for the widely prescribed antidepressant Prozac) to synthesize the drug contrary to existing international patent accords--making the US government and Lilly the first illegal domestic manufacturers and distributors of LSD.

From:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/MonBushAdmin.cfm
  • First. Monsanto's lawyer was appointed to the Supreme Court by George Bush, Sr. The deciding swing vote giving the election to George, Jr. was made by Clarence Thomas, Esq.
  • Second. Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (missing text...) purchased by Monsanto.
  • Third. Ann Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture was on the board of directors of Calgene Pharmaceuticals, purchased by Monsanto.
  • Fourth. Tommy Thompson, Secretary of Health was a supporter of Monsanto in Wisconsin. He received $50,000 from Biotech firms is his election run, and used state funds to set up a a $317 million dollar biotech zone in Wisconsin.
  • Fifth. Mitch Daniels, Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Daniels was the vice president of corporate strategy at Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical company. Eli Lilly and Monsanto developed the genetically engineered bovine growth hormone. Lilly "owns" the European "franchise." Daniels presence insures that the bovine growth hormone will one day be approved for use in Europe.
  • Sixth. Last, but not least. John Ashcroft, Attorney General. Winner of the Monsanto PAC sweepstakes.
From:
http://www.ctrl.org/essay1/ESB6.html

The War on Drugs: An "Intellectual Fraud"

Before the Vietnam "War", the Golden Triangle was run by French Intelligence and Corsican mobsters. After the French bailed out and America moved in, the triangle was run by U.S. intelligence, with aid from Sicilian mobsters. This narcotics network is well documented in "The Politics of Heroin in S. E. Asia" by Alfred McCoy, "The Great Heroin Coup" by Henrik Kruger and "Double-Cross" by Sam and Chuck Giancana.

Vice-President George Bush, as Chairman of President Reagan's cabinet-level working group and as Director of the National Narcotics Interdiction System, was the highest U. S. governmental official involved in the "war on drugs". Frances Mullen, Jr., former head of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), called Bush's efforts "an intellectual fraud" and "a liability rather than an asset". Soon after these statements, Mullen resigned and the resultant General Accounting Office (GAO) report was buried.

In July, 1985, the suppressed GAO paper reported that there were "no benefits from the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System, directed by George Bush. In fact, the overall effect was to encourage supply...."

Monika Jensen-Stevenson, a "60 Minutes" producer, quit her job after the CBS news program refused to air the story she had uncovered relating to the covert drug trade. Her book, "Kiss The Boys Goodbye", details how our intelligence community used the apparatus of the POW/MIA governmental agencies as a cover for the trafficking of opiates from the "Golden Triangle".

President Reagan appointed Reform Party founder and Texas billionaire Ross Perot to the President's Advisory Council on Foreign Intelligence. Reagan made Perot a special presidential investigator, looking into America's POW and MIAs from the Vietnam "War".

Ross took the job to heart and spent considerable time and money in pursuit of the quest. He was given special clearance and access. He asked questions and interviewed everyone he could find.

From "Kiss The Boys Goodbye":

"Relations between Bush and Perot had gone downhill ever since the Vice-President had asked Ross Perot how his POW/MIA investigations were going.

'Well, George, I go in looking for prisoners,' said Perot, 'but I spend all my time discovering the government has been moving drugs around the world and is involved in illegal arms deals.... I can't get at the prisoners because of the corruption among our own people.'

"This ended Perot's official access to the highly classified files as a one-man presidential investigator. 'I have been instructed to cease and desist,' he had informed the families of missing men early in 1987."

The wholesale importation of cocaine into the U.S. during "Iran/Contra" is also well documented. George Bush, is known "to be in the loop" with many of the players keeping in contact directly with his office.

Also, there has been much speculation as to the use of the off-shore rigs, pipelines and other assets of Zapata Offshore being used for narcotic trans-shipments.

Narcotics such as cocaine and heroin cannot be manufactured without the precursor chemicals. One of the largest makers of these precursor chemicals is the Eli Lilly Company of Indianapolis, Indiana. The Quayle family is a large stockholder, and George Bush has been on the Board of Directors. Eli Lilly is also the company that first synthesized LSD for the CIA.

See also:
www.motherjones.com/mother_jones/JA95/piggies.html

www.ewg.org/reports/GeorgeWBush/enviro_advisors.html

And from:

What happened with Prozac?

Copyright 2002 Eli Lilly and Company.
No company would relish losing the patent on its biggest product three years early. We certainly don't.

We were very surprised and disappointed by the judicial ruling that invalidated our 2003 U.S. patent on Prozac. We strongly disagree with the court's decision, and we are doing everything we can through the judicial process to reestablish our rights.

In the meantime, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted us market exclusivity until August 2, 2001, under a federal statute encouraging pediatric studies of certain medicines.

We intend to focus on Prozac in the United States right up to the last day of its exclusivity. And we'll pursue related opportunities.

One is our patented once-weekly formulation aimed at preventing the recurrence of depression. A second is SarafemTM, a newly introduced brand for women who suffer from premenstrual dysphoric disorder, the severe mood and physical symptoms associated with their menstrual cycle that interfere with their daily activity and relationships.

We won't miss any opportunities for Prozac--or the rest of our business. For the last four years, we've been preparing to bridge the gap that would be created by generic competition for Prozac. We're ready.

For proof of the above statement, turn to any television set and watch for terms like "seratonin reuptake inhibitor" and "side effect include" followed by a dizzying list of symptoms.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Jose Melendez on March 19, 2002 at 09:32:17 PT:

Learn from history: follow the money
...projectiles belched from the enemy's AA batteries as soon as Bush and his squadron mates were over the island. Tiny black puffs of smoke thickened around his plane as he approached the target and dove steeply -- so steeply that Bush felt like he was standing on his head. But before he reached the radio facility the plane was hit.

Ltjg. Bush, who felt the plane "lift" from the hit, continued his dive toward the target and dropped his payload. The four 500-pound bombs exploded, causing damaging hits. For his courage and disregard for his own safety in pressing home his attack, he was later awarded a Distinguished Flying Cross.

Bush maneuvered the Avenger over the ocean with the hope it would make the journey back to San Jacinto. But the plane began to blaze and clouds of smoke soon enveloped the cockpit. Choking and gasping for air, Bush and one of his aircrewmen wriggled out of the plane and leaped from about 1,500 feet. His other crewman, dead or seriously injured from the blast, went down with the Avenger.

Bush parachuted safely into the water, dangerously close to the shore. Unfortunately, the aircrewman fell helplessly to his death because his parachute failed to open properly.

No one ever knew which one bailed out with Mr. Bush," said Nadeau, now a building contractor in Ramona, Calif. "I would assume it was Delaney, because as the radioman, he would go out first to leave room for the gunner to climb down out of the turret and put his chute on.

"There wasn't room in the turret for the gunner to wear a parachute. As a gunner, my parachute hung on the bulkhead of the plane near Delaney. We set up an escape procedure where he was supposed to hand me my chute and jump, and then I was to follow him. The procedure took a couple of seconds."

Once in a former life as a C-SPAN junkie, I faxed my congratulations to George Herbert Walker Bush for making his second jump from a "perfectly good airplane."

(At the time, I was also managing a parachute center near Key West, and was temporarily mortified when one of the callers suggested that I was implying he did not have to jump - I was merely referring to the phrase I hear most from those who do not jump: "Why would anyone jump from a perfectly good airplane?" I think the resulting conversations made it clear enough I meant only the best wishes...)

Recalling that experience, it occurs to me that I was also very busy doing freefall videos that people from around the world have recognized as very high quality, professional work.

While those against some drugs are busily claiming pot causes amotivational syndrome, they also feel obliged to make sure that any of us that are motivated are not allowed to work.

Is it illegal for a former VP at Eli Lilly to speak out against some drugs at work while remaining silent on Prozac? Probably not. But it sure seems like a conflict of interest to me. Those kinds of omissions of fact might never be prosecuted, but are serious and real, with the consequence that billions of dollars are wasted propping up companies that sell poison, and millions of consumers are defrauded throughout their lifetimes up to and including their premature deaths from these addictive substances that are considered socially acceptable.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 09:06:14 PT
Here what was said about President Bush on PI
Alexandra: But the main difference is --

Michael: Who has this drunken guy aimed a gun at that he shouldn't have?

Bill: Yeah, President Bush has not been drinking for years.

[ Laughter ]

I object to all this drinking, drinking, drinking stuff.

Alexandra: Obviously, you weren't at the White House Christmas party this year, my friend.

[ Light laughter ]

Bill: You're right.

http://abc.abcnews.go.com/primetime/politicallyincorrect/episodes/2001-02/312.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by Robbie on March 19, 2002 at 08:59:44 PT
...could help exterminate terrorism.
Getting rid of drugs in the workplace...

Getting rid of drugs...

Having a slice of apple pie...

Ending teen pregnancy...

Paying your taxes...

Paying your taxes to me...

Honoring thy father and mother...

Believing in the one, true god...

Honoring me, and the great Ronald Reagan...

Drilling in the ANWR...

A capital-gains tax cut...

Allowing Republicans to have all the tax breaks they want...

Going to church...

Building more prisons...

Fealty to me and little Georgie Jr....

This message brought to you by AVOT (Americans for Victory Over Terrorism) - "Keeping America safe from its own brand of terrorism- oh, WAIT! No, we don't want to do that. PUICE ALERT! PUICE ALERT!"

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by null on March 19, 2002 at 08:56:41 PT
performance
what ever happened to employees being valued by their performance instead of their urine? I think plenty of businesses still know that it is the caliber of the employee that matters. I was shocked to find otu that 87% of big businesses do drug testing. I'm lucky to be sustainably self-employed.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by FoM on March 19, 2002 at 08:47:09 PT
Question
I know the president and his wife have had problems with alcohol and if he is alcohol free that's good and necessary but on Politically Incorrect they where kidding about Bush and someone that was at a party said he still drinks. Did anyone else see that show? I am not good at remembering word for word but I do remember it being said. I'll go look for transcripts and see if I can find it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Dark Star on March 19, 2002 at 08:17:47 PT
Horrible Trend
A terrible trend is developing in which the propaganda machine of the nation is becoming so entrenched that it will be increasingly difficult to any dissent to surface.

Here we have the promotion and promulgation of a failed policy (drug testing) offered up as some kind of patriotic prerogative that the serfs treasure. The whole affair stinks.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by goneposthole on March 19, 2002 at 08:05:42 PT
Who can?
Who can go to work drunk and expect to do a days worth of work?

Unless you are W.C. fields.

You will tip over the tractor and crush yourself.

You'll cut off four fingers. You will terrify yourself.

Stay home.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 19, 2002 at 07:16:18