Cannabis News Cannabis TV
  Looking for Allies in Colombia
Posted by FoM on March 10, 2002 at 10:27:16 PT
By Ana Carrigan 
Source: New York Times 

justice When the Colombian peace talks collapsed on Feb. 20, local authorities in towns and villages around the former peace zone had less than three hours' warning before President Andres Pastrana sent planes and helicopters to bomb their territory. They had no time to organize protection for civilians.

Georgina and Adam, who feared that divulging their full names would be unsafe, were two people I met in the village of Los Pozos. Their small plot abutted the government's negotiation site.

None of the negotiators from the government or the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC, ever dropped by to greet them. They are very poor, and the poor in Colombia are invisible.

Georgina is 70; Adam is 84. In the photograph on my desk, they stand side by side outside the one-room wooden shack that has been their home for 30 years. Georgina, short and sturdy, barely reaches to Adam's chest. Her strong face is deeply lined, but despite the harshness of her life, her expression is warm and gentle. Adam is thin and rather frail. He holds himself very straight and looks sternly at the camera. The day I took their picture, Georgina insisted I share their lunch: a slice of plantain, a slice of yucca and a fish the size of a sardine, taken from the nearby river.

We met on a Saturday in January. The peace process was in crisis. Ten days earlier, President Pastrana had broken off talks and given the FARC 48 hours to abandon its government- sanctioned safe haven. Representatives of the United Nations, the international community and the Catholic Church were working around the clock to avert war. On that Saturday they had not yet achieved an agreement, and the Colombian Army was waiting for the expiration of the midnight deadline on Sunday to attack.

Adam yearned for peace, "a clean peace," he said, "that lets us work." When I asked him what would happen if the talks should collapse, he made a sudden, wordless gesture that meant, "We'll be off." How? Where to? He didn't know. He only knew that after three years of involuntary cohabitation with the FARC, he and Georgina would be marked people. The war between the guerrillas and the government is not their war, but that would not matter to either side.

President Bush has been right in refusing to become more deeply involved in this war and in refusing to expand American assistance from counternarcotics to counterinsurgency. Less than two weeks ago he said, "We are providing advice to the Colombian government as to drug eradication, and we will keep it that way." But the political pressure to change is growing.

The Pentagon and officials from other parts of the Bush administration, as well as President Pastrana, are trying to tie the war between the Colombian government and the FARC to the global war against terrorism. Last week the House passed a nonbinding resolution backing Colombia in its efforts against "United States- designated foreign terrorist organizations," which would include the FARC. And Mr. Powell stated that the "new situation" in Colombia may require the United States to "readjust" its policies.

Such a shift in policy would be fundamentally wrong and must be resisted at all costs. Sad as it is to report, there are no good guys in the Colombian war picture. The guerrilla insurgency is not the cause of Colombia's distress. It is a symptom of a national sickness deeply rooted in a corrupted political system. That system is imploding. There is no legitimate partner in this conflict for the United States.

This does not mean the United States has no role to play. Colombia urgently needs Washington's help. The tragedy for both countries is that historically, the United States has used its influence to strengthen many of the worst elements of a byzantine society whose complexities Washington has never succeeded in deciphering.

What makes Colombia so difficult to understand is its political system. Formally a civilian democracy, the government is an unequal partnership between two forces — one civilian and democratic, the other military. Over the last 25 years, the military partner has increased its power and the war has escalated.

Every attempt by the civilians to bring peace has been shot down by the military's dirty war. Throughout these long and bloody years, the civilian partner has skillfully concealed its complicity in the dominance of its military partner, thus perpetuating the fiction of civilian and democratic governance. The resulting state is one in which democracy and barbarism coexist and the military — which practices dirty warfare against the system's democratic opponents — has failed to develop a professional army capable of fighting the guerrillas effectively.

The state and the army are now collapsing. President Bush confronts an enormous challenge. Can the United States devise a fresh strategy, focused on strengthening the independent democratic forces on the fringes of the Colombian political establishment? Their survival now depends on American help to stop the war and make possible a return to negotiations under minimal conditions: a bilateral cease-fire, rigorously monitored by an independent third force; the release of all the FARC's hostages; and the inclusion of an international mediator and representatives of civil society at the negotiations. Such an outcome is not unrealistic with Washington on board. It would protect and give a say to those civil society forces that are America's true Colombian friends. It would help lay the basis for the construction of a democratic and stable society.

After three years of a tense calm, people in the former peace zone have been engulfed in this ferocious war; thousands are fleeing. One image from my recent visit haunts me. Georgina and Adam set out stools beside the dirt road leading to the negotiation site, and there they sat gazing up the hill to where the mediators were working. Two old people, in the falling dusk, waiting for someone to tell them whether they would need to flee their home. I wonder what happened to them one month later. Were they sleeping when the army bombed the zone?

Ana Carrigan reports from Colombia for The Irish Times.

Source: New York Times (NY)
Author: Ana Carrigan
Published: March 10, 2002
Copyright: 2002 The New York Times Company
Contact: letters@nytimes.com
Website: http://www.nytimes.com/
Forum: http://forums.nytimes.com/comment/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

House Approves Resolution Calling For More Aid
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12175.shtml

Plan Colombia: This Will Be Worse Than Vietnam
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12137.shtml

U.S. To Be Drawn Into Colombian War?
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12094.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 10, 2002 at 10:27:16