Cannabis News The November Coalition
  Make Cannabis Legal Now
Posted by FoM on March 09, 2002 at 18:43:56 PT
Independent Argument 
Source: Independent UK 

cannabis The Government's drug advisers are set to call for the legal downgrading of cannabis – a step which will mean that possession of the drug will no longer be an arrestable offence. This was one of the key demands of this newspaper's campaign for decriminalisation.

Reclassification of cannabis to a class C drug is the first step towards a more enlightened approach to drugs in Britain. When we began our campaign, it was widely deemed daring or even dangerous.

It is heartening how quickly the national debate on drugs has matured. What was then seen as a minority view now has the support of a Home Secretary not otherwise known for liberal tendencies and a substantial number of senior figures in both opposition parties. Even an initially sceptical Tony Blair has been won over by David Blunkett's arguments that too much police time and money is wasted pursuing cannabis users.

We have always maintained that a harsh approach to cannabis is counterproductive because it makes criminals of otherwise law-abiding people. The Misuse of Drugs Act must be the most flouted piece of legislation in British history. The Government should now show that it has the courage of its convictions and formally decriminalise the drug.

The Liberal Democrats' decision yesterday to make such a move party policy is an example to follow. That party's further recommendations that Ecstasy be reclassified and those who commit drug-related crimes should not face prison may be moves too far. But they remind us of the importance of continually reviewing our thinking on drugs.

The present situation is highly unsatisfactory. More school-age children are using the drug by the year, so the Just Say No message is clearly not getting through. The illegality of cannabis has also meant that, in acquiring the drug, teenagers were likely to be exposed to other, more harmful substances. Certainly, there must be strong disincentives to supplying drugs to children. But there is no point in kidding ourselves that the present restrictions are having a deterrent effect: they are not.

The messages sent by successive governments on drugs have been distrusted because they lacked frankness. Minimising harm should be the watchwords of policy-makers. We said that at the start of our campaign. The message has finally been heard.

Source: Independent (UK)
Published: March 10, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd.
Contact: letters@independent.co.uk
Website: http://www.independent.co.uk/

Related Articles:

Britain's Liberal Democrats Vote for Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread12189.shtml

Why Britain is Going Dutch
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11175.shtml

The Pragmatic Path To Cannabis Reform
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11168.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #2 posted by SoberStoner on March 09, 2002 at 20:22:24 PT:

Remember this line..
the Just Say No message is clearly not getting through.

Where did that message come from? It certainly didnt start in england. This is yet another move by the brits to distance themselves from the U$A. I'm a little surprised that Britain could legalize it before anyone else, but i think that they are starting to see the light and that heavy handed lock em up and throw away the key approach isnt working. Unlike the states where we have lots of open space to build nothing but forced concentraion camps, err labor camps..err prisons..britain has only so much space to deal with and they cant deal with the over flowing prison population by making it BIGGER. The time has come for treatment over punishment, and it is time for the truth about cannabis and prohibition's nauseating history to be told.

SS

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by p4me on March 09, 2002 at 19:36:34 PT
way to go UK
It is about enough to cause me to move to England and finish out my days. I cannot get over the tyranny of the US government in relation to cannabis. Here we have a newspaper taking a position and advancing it. Here in the US the newspapers hardly print the word marijuana.

I thought maybe someone would have mentioned something Peter Jennings covered on the 6:30 news on Friday. It was about mostly senior citizens that ordered their prescription medicine from Canada- which is illegal.

He said Americans spent $208 billion on prescription drugs last year. The coverage by reporter Bill Reading talked to a woman that made $15,000 a year. She said by ordering from Canada her drug cost would go down from $1068 to $640. They talked to another woman named Carol Lee Hatch that takes Tamoxifin for breast cancer. She said it cost $13.95 from Canada and $187.00 in the US. The company they cited in the article was Canadian Meds USA and they have a website although I have done a google search to find it.

Reading said it does violate drug laws and echoed the FDA statement that the reason they do not prosecute the offenders is because action would punish the elderly, most on fixed incomes. The FDA said they cannot quarantee the purity of the drugs. Reading went on to say they are mostly the same as you would find here. The little country of Canada can negotiate with the drug companies but big old Washington is helpless. Maybe we should hire their negotiators. Of course that assumes that the US government actually cares about controlling cost even as the deficit approaches $6 trillion.

Now here we have seniors violating drug laws. We have underage people smoking everyday and underage alcohol consumption. And that is no big deal because it is not marijuana. What happened to the DEA bull$hit about "We take our job seriously" at a time when the DEA is protecting from hempseed oil. It is all screwed up as everyone already knows.

My main interest in mentioning this is what is going to happen when GW Pharacueticals gets their whole cannabis products on the market. Yea it is ok to break the law with some things but how about cannabis. The prohibitionist are in a pinch. From what I have read, a foreign national would not be allowed to be arrested if it is a legal prescription from his home country. I still wonder what would happen if you had dual citizenship say with Canada, and you got your prescription there and came here with it.

The California primaries set a new record for low turnout- 31%. If everyone would vote against all of the incumbents we would wipe a lot of the basdards that puretuate this prohibition and propaganda out of office. For goodness sake vote. VAAI



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 09, 2002 at 18:43:56