Cannabis News Stop the Drug War!
  New York Times Ad Sparks Debate
Posted by FoM on March 08, 2002 at 08:01:46 PT
By Graham Dostal  
Source: Daily Cardinal  

medical A recent full-page advertisement in The New York Times in support of the legalization of medicinal marijuana has reintroduced the controversy in Wisconsin surrounding the issue.

The ad, in the form of a letter to President Bush, included endorsements from many state representatives, including nine from Wisconsin, medical professionals, political organizations and celebrities expressing their support for medicinal marijuana.

"Marijuana has been shown to be a useful tool in the treatment of nausea and other complications associated with chemotherapy," said Tom Powell, legislative aid to state Rep. Terese Berceau, D-Madison.

Marijuana can also be used to stimulate the appetite of AIDS patients in the phase called "wasting," according to Gina Dennik-Champion, executive director of the Wisconsin Nurses Association, which also supported the ad.

Jason Young, coordinator for The Coalition for Compassionate Access, said the country is behind the use of medical marijuana.

"In poll after poll this is something the American people wholeheartedly support," he said. "The numbers run at three-quarters of the population supporting doctors being able to prescribe medical marijuana."

In a recent survey Berceau conducted, 82 percent of her constituents answered positively in support of the use of marijuana for medicinal use.

State Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Madison, who collected the Wisconsin signatures for the ad, said the issue should not be considered irrelevant.

"We need to have a rational debate about these things and that's really what we're asking the Bush administration at the federal level to do," he said.

Pocan has co-authored a state Assembly bill to legalize medicinal marijuana. The bill would allow the drug to be used for such illnesses as AIDS, cancer or glaucoma.

"We patterned ours after the law in Hawaii, which would essentially allow for the medical use of marijuana if a doctor prescribes it and it's the best route for various ailments," he said.

Pocan added that if patients and their doctors decide marijuana would best treat their ailments it shouldn't be a criminal offense.

On the federal level, officials are unaware of the importance of the problem according to Krissy Oechslin, assistant director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project, which paid for the New York Times ad.

"For some people the best thing is marijuana, except it happens to be illegal," Oechslin said. "The government should allow access to it on a case-by-case basis for people who can benefit from it."

Complete Title: New York Times Ad Sparks Debate on Medical Marijuana Use in Wis.

Source: Daily Cardinal (WI Edu)
Author: Graham Dostal
Published: March 8, 2002
Copyright: 2002 The Daily Cardinal Newspaper Corporation
Website: http://www.cardinal.wisc.edu/
Feedback: http://www.cardinal.wisc.edu/feedback/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

Marijuana Policy Project
http://www.mpp.org/

Coalition for Compassionate Access
http://compassionateaccess.org/

Medical Marijuana Information Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/medical.htm

New York Times Medical Marijuana Ad
http://compassionateaccess.org/nytimesad.html

Medical Marijuana Bill Deserves Real Consideration
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11821.shtml

Wisconsin Should Take Lead In Marijuana Research
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11768.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #10 posted by FoM on March 10, 2002 at 07:43:57 PT
Aggressive Placer Anti-Pot Force Targeted

By Wayne Wilson -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 5:30 a.m. PST Sunday, March 10, 2002

Press releases heralding the exploits of Placer County's wide-ranging Marijuana Eradication Team kept the media's fax machines purring in 1998 and 1999.

Not many days went by without a new announcement by sheriff's representatives that a search warrant had been served, suspects had been arrested and indoor pot gardens had been seized, most of them in neighboring Sacramento County.

Today, the raids have stopped.

And the focus has shifted from reports of ambitious police actions to charges of misconduct.

More than a dozen individuals targeted by the Placer County narcotics unit in 1998 and 1999 now claim, in five federal lawsuits, that their civil rights were violated by "lying," "malicious," "unprofessional," "storm-trooper-style" officers.

One judge agrees there were defects in the warrants and went so far as to accuse a detective of lying to the magistrate who issued those warrants about license plates he said he checked and subpoenas he said he served.

In papers filed with the court, a Sacramento deputy district attorney prosecuting the drug cases steadfastly defended the detective's actions as "mistakes," saying, "If you flyspeck a man's career and look at 40 warrants ... you are going to find some mistakes."

No one in the Placer County Sheriff's Department is permitted to comment on the lawsuits or the campaign that came to be known as "Operation Greenfire."

"We've been told not to discuss it at all," said Capt. Rick Armstrong, the sheriff's spokesman.

That includes Sheriff Ed Bonner, Special Operations Unit Sgt. Ron Ashford and all the deputies involved, Armstrong said.

The veil of silence was drawn by Placer County attorney David K. Huskey, whose job, over the next several years, will be to defend against the lawsuits.

Huskey said he feels the allegations against the county and its narcotics officers are groundless and wants the matter litigated in a courtroom, not the media.

In the eye of the legal storm is Tracy Grant, a 27-year career detective in Placer County.

Grant's name is all over the warrants that permitted him and a team of officers to enter the homes of residents in Sacramento, Carmichael, Citrus Heights, Fair Oaks, Antelope, Rio Linda and Roseville. Officers said at the time they were going into Sacramento because that's where their leads took them. Placer County had blanket approval from the Sacramento County sheriff to conduct the raids.

The team was looking for indoor marijuana growing, and in most of the residences entered, found what it was looking for.

Snipped

Complete Article: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/1819208p-1897364c.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by Jose Melendez on March 09, 2002 at 06:38:41 PT:

on full circles...
I really do not think they are idiots. Some habitual prohibitionists actively avoid the truth until they find out for themselves and/or through sources they trust. Others knowingly suppress the truth and usually have some vested financial interest. I think of them as professional prohibitionists. Those are the ones the Justice Department, FTC and SEC should look into.

I get the impression that people like Joyce fit into the former category; as I've mentioned before, she might someday become one of our strongest allies. As long as she fights for truth instead of the lies she used to believe and promote, I can envision her testifying to Congress about how she used to fight against hemp foods, but that facts and science showed her the truth of the matter - that cannabis seeds contain the highest palatable amounts of EFA's, can be converted economically to a clean buring diesel, etc.

(Ford just announced support for diesel as an environmentally safer fuel, still artificial price supports in the form of tax breaks are weighed heavily in favor of fossil fuels...)

New and safer medications, even drug replacement therapies will be technological advances encouraged by legalized hemp production of all forms. Bill Clinton used to speak of new jobs for technologies that had not even been invented yet. I think he was right to push for a robust economy that benefits all, no matter what he did in his private personal life.



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by The GCW on March 08, 2002 at 19:32:22 PT
Wow
Imagine the irony, when some prohibitionist gets nauseous realizing they have been caging innocent humans, for using cannabis, and that cannabis in fact even helps THEIR sick nauseousness.

a REALLY SICK SOCIETY WOULD PROHIBIT CANNABIS TO THOSE WHO PROHIBITED IT INNITIALLY. So if we take notes of who the prohibitionist are, and later (once legal)when they are sick, they will be denied. The owners manual, speaks against such, for it is not the way to love your brother. Thus the point, in full circle?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by ekim on March 08, 2002 at 18:33:22 PT:

Radioactive fertilizer
Article: cannabis tar doesnt kill!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<http://alberta.indymedia.org:8081/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/2221-smoke_pa\ ck.jpg

Cannabis is often compared to tobacco, with the damage caused by smoking tobacco given as a reason to prohibit use of cannabis. Yet most of the harms caused by tobacco use are due not to tar, but to the use of radioactive fertilizers. Surprisingly, radiation seems to be the most dangerous and important factor behind tobacco lung damage.

Radioactive fertilizer

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by mayan on March 08, 2002 at 17:28:43 PT
Yeah!!!
Thanks for the link Kap'n! Looks like the timing of the DEA raids & the absurd hemp-food ban backfired on the lame-brains!!! They get what they deserve. We can thank the Shrub,Assa & Asscrotch for the demise of California's marijuana foes! Such beloved(for the moment)idiots they are.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by kaptinemo on March 08, 2002 at 12:31:32 PT:

This is what we can accomplish
when we get pissed off enough to make our displeasure known:

http://www.drcnet.org/wol/227.html#marijuanafoes

The article makes legitimate questions as to the efficacy of the movement; all well and good. Whether the organizations mentioned had developed enough political clout to have such an effect is arguable.

But what cannot be denied is that those who ran roughshod over the rights of Californian voters...are now out on their arse in the cold. Because individual voters threw them out. Individual voters...like you and me.

Finally, after long last, the antis are realizing their days of easy poaching are drawing to a close. The 'rabbits' they once scorned have remembered that they have a sharp teeth...and a voice...and power.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on March 08, 2002 at 09:50:51 PT
TroutMask
Isn't that the truth. I don't need those kind of thrills.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by TroutMask on March 08, 2002 at 09:41:34 PT
.........
I kind of like it being illegal though...it makes it more thrilling...

It's even more "thrilling" when they put you in jail.

-TM

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by project419 on March 08, 2002 at 08:49:12 PT:

yeah
A person should be entitled to do what they want to do... it's there life...I kind of like it being illegal though...it makes it more thrilling...if it was legal I really don't even think it would be as bad as people say it would be...it's only weed...shit your more likely to die or get brain damage from playing football than you are from smoking a little harmless marijuana...why don't they make football illegal?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by greenfox on March 08, 2002 at 08:25:03 PT
More forced treatment
"For some people the best thing is marijuana, except it happens to be illegal," Oechslin said. "The government should allow access to it on a case-by-case basis for people who can benefit from it."

No, what the government SHOULD do is stop trying to make nature illegal. Why should the sick be entitled to nature and the healthy should be....imprisoned for it?

It's bullshit.

sly in green, foxy in kind, -gf

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 08, 2002 at 08:01:46