Cannabis News NORML - It's Time for a Change!
  Bill Clarifies Medical Marijuana Guidelines
Posted by FoM on March 06, 2002 at 12:12:15 PT
By Michael O'D. Moore, of the News Staff 
Source: Bangor Daily News  

medical Two legislative committees are recommending passage of a compromise bill that attempts to clarify the use of marijuana for medical uses.

The Health and Human Services and Judiciary committees voted by more than 2-to-1 to recommend the bill that establishes an “affirmative defense to prosecution, for the possession of marijuana by a qualified patient or ‘designated caregiver.’” The bill won’t, as originally intended, create a legalized distribution system in Maine for marijuana used as medicine.

Last year the U.S. Supreme Court struck down distribution efforts in California, even as Maine lawmakers were considering a similar system for Maine. In 1999, Mainers overwhelmingly approved a referendum legalizing the use of small amounts of marijuana for medical purposes. Referendum proponents argued that marijuana is helpful to people in curbing side effects for medical treatments such as chemotherapy.

“With such a large segment of society voting for the use of marijuana for medical purposes, it has been too long in getting to this stage,” said Rep. Edward Dugay, D-Cherryfield. “This was a fair compromise.”

Dugay, in an interview Tuesday before the Health and Human Services Committee, accepted changes to the bill’s technical language, saying that the large-scale distribution system proposed in the original bill “wouldn’t fly” because of the Supreme Court’s decision.

The legal expert for the Maine Attorney General’s Office was unavailable Tuesday and no one else could comment on the legality of the compromise or other issues, a spokeswoman said.

The new bill would:

* Define a “usable amount of marijuana for medical use” as 2.5 ounces or less of harvested marijuana — up from 1.25 ounces.

* Allow up to six plants for the growing of marijuana for medical uses with three being mature plants.

* Define a “designated caregiver” as someone who is at least 18 years of age, who lives under the same roof, and who is a family member or a person with “power of attorney for health care.”

* Assert that it is an “affirmative defense to prosecution” for a qualified patient or caregiver to possess or furnish marijuana for medical purposes as defined by Maine law.

The statement of an affirmative defense flies in the face of federal law, which lists marijuana as a controlled substance. Rep. Robert Nutting, R-Oakland, said that the conflict of laws puts law enforcement in a tough spot, but, he said, “it’s workable under federal law.”

“It’s kind of like driving 5 miles an hour above the speed limit — no one’s going to enforce that,” he said.

Nutting said he had been opposed to the referendum question, but once voters passed it overwhelmingly, the Legislature had a mandate to assist. The compromise “does about all we can do,” he said.

Note: 2 state panels back compromise establishing ‘affirmative defense to prosecution’

Source: Bangor Daily News (ME)
Author: Michael O'D. Moore, of the News Staff
Published: Wednesday, March 6, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Bangor Daily News Inc.
Contact: letters@bangordailynews.net
Website: http://www.bangornews.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Mainers For Medical Rights
http://www.mainers.org/

Marijuana Fear Factor Anticipated
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9743.shtml

Panel Backs Medical Pot Supply Plan
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9579.shtml

Maine Awaits Drug Ruling
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9002.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #2 posted by DebaterAmy on March 07, 2002 at 12:33:04 PT:

Why not just legalize it?
Look, if we had legalized marijuana, we could possess and use it free of legal action, and grow it with a liscense. It's ridiculous to outlaw it! Come on, it's got to have medicinal purposes. If we could research it, I'm sure we'd find that it increases mental health! Besides, keeping marijuana illegal only serves as a tool to let the U.S. invade any place they want, take whatever they want, and discriminate as they please. Why not outlaw alcohol? You can screw yourself up with that! The government can't protect people from themselves, no matter how hard they try.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by TroutMask on March 06, 2002 at 12:48:58 PT
Oops!
There goes another rubber tree plant!

We've got high hopes!

-TM

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 06, 2002 at 12:12:15