However, smokers who have toked for a long time may cause themselves irreversible brain damage that leads to permanent memory and thinking problems. So says a new study by international researchers who have found the cognitive deficits associated with marijuana use are worse in people with a longer history of taking the drug.

However, at least one cannabis researcher says the findings don't jibe with a recent study showing that even long-term marijuana use causes no appreciable mental deficits.

A report on the findings appears in tomorrow's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

More than 7 million Americans say they smoke marijuana at least once a week. Scientists generally agree that pot dulls the mind for about 12 to 24 hours, and users will suffer on cognitive tests until the drug washes out of their system. However, there's less agreement about whether long-term use of marijuana exacerbates these effects.

The latest study, led by Nadia Solowij, a researcher at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, suggests the answer may be yes.

Solowij and her colleagues, including scientists in the United States, studied 102 heavy pot smokers seeking treatment for their drug use.

The volunteers, mostly young and middle-aged men, took a battery of nine memory, learning and cognition tests. Half reported taking the drug daily or nearly every day for an average of about 24 years. The rest said they had been smoking just as much, but for roughly half as long -- 10 years, on average.

The tests included word recall tasks, card sorting, time-lapse estimation, and other standardized exams. All were performed after the subjects had refrained from using marijuana for an average of 17 hours.

Long-term users scored worse than short-term users and a control group of 33 non-users on tests measuring recall and attention span, the researchers say. They were able to remember fewer words, retained less and had trouble retrieving information.

Short-term smokers generally scored as well as the non-users, although both groups of users had problems noting the passage of time.

The deficits were in the "moderate to large range," with the biggest difference in word memorization and recall, says Robert Stephens, a psychologist at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and a co-author of the study. "But it's difficult to translate that into daily functioning."

Stephens says those sorts of declines might spell trouble for academic learning or performing a complex task, although there's no evidence of that yet.

Joseph E. Manno, a cannabis expert at Louisiana State University in Shreveport, says the new findings are "consistent with what you would expect from a drug that is cumulative." The question, Manno adds, is how significant the deficits become.

"Are you really, really dangerous, or are you so sedated that you would never engage in any kind of activity that requires skill?" he asks.

However, Dr. Harrison Pope Jr., a Harvard University psychiatrist, says that while the study may be smoke, it's not necessarily fire.

It conflicts with a recent analysis he conducted of a group of studies showing that long-term pot smoking made no appreciable dent in seven of eight standard measures of brain function, and had only a minor impact on one learning test.

In addition, nearly half of the long-term users in the latest study had also regularly used, been dependent on, or been treated for addiction to alcohol or other drugs, which might have affected their memory and cognitive ability.

What's more, says Pope, the pot smokers were all seeking treatment for their habit, while the non-using volunteers were drawn from the community by advertisements. People in treatment programs often have other psychiatric problems, such as anxiety or depression -- and may be taking medication for those conditions -- that can affect their results on cognitive tests. Stephens says his group tried to control for these and other factors, including medication and substance intake.

Thus, Pope says, "we cannot say for sure whether the greater deficits in the long-term users are necessarily attributable to their long-term use." In fact, he adds, his own work implies they might not be. One study he helped conduct showed the impact of marijuana on the brain dissolved when smokers had been off the drug for 28 days.

"As long as there are substantial amounts of the drug still present, there's no question that impairment exists," Pope says. The active ingredient in pot, THC, hangs around in fat, slowly percolating out of the body and causing memory and cognitive hiccups that can linger for days.

"But as to whether it permanently harms the brain, I would say that the jury is still out on that," he says.

Source: HealthScout.com
Author: Adam Marcus, HealthScout News Reporter
Published: Tuesday, March 5, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Healthscout.com
Website: http://www.healthscout.com/

Ethan Russo M.D. - Chronic Cannabis Use
http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/ccu.pdf

Nerves Need Marijuana-Like Substance
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9799.shtml

Expanding Our Minds About Pot
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9698.shtml

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

Example: I'm 28 and have smoked for 10 years. I'm 42 and have smoke for 26 years. It's easy to see that the smoking has no bearing on those particular reults.

• HempSense.net

1968 UK ROYAL COMMISSION, THE WOOTTON REPORT:
"Having reviewed all the material available to us we find ourselves in agreement with the conclusion reached by the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission appointed by the Government of India (1893-94) and the New York Mayor's Committee (1944 - LaGuardia)that the long-term consumption of cannabis in moderate doses has no harmful effects" "the long-asserted dangers of cannabis are exaggerated and that the related law is socially damaging, if not unworkable"

[ Post Comment ]

To study out-of-control individuals who seek treatment and consider them representative of the population at large is just silly. Did these researchers ever take a college science course?

[ Post Comment ]

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

[ Post Comment ]

Previous data from Solowij favor the possibility of persistent deficits associated with lifetime duration of cannabis exposure.6 However, the weight of evidence from other studies seems tilted in the opposite direction. For example, a recent meta-analysis of neuropsychological studies of long-term marijuana users found no significant evidence for deficits in 7 of 8 neuropsychological ability areas and only a small effect size (ie, 0.23 SD units; 99% confidence interval, 0.03-0.43) for the remaining area of learning.7 Another recent study5 from our laboratory, published subsequent to this meta-analysis, found virtually no significant differences between 108 heavy cannabis users and 72 controlsscreened to exclude those with current psychiatric disorders, medication use, or any history of significant use of other drugs or alcohol on a battery of 10 neuropsychological tests after 28 days of supervised abstinence from the drug. In addition, no significant associations were found between the number of episodes of lifetime cannabis use and any of the test scores at day 28 even though the heavy users had smoked a median of about 15 000 times over periods ranging from 10 to 33 years.5 Further analysis of these data for associations between lifetime use and performance at day 0 and day 1 of abstinence revealed trends that were almost always in the same direction as those reported by Solowij et al,1 but the effect sizes were much smaller (unpublished data).

• Cannabis, Cognition, and Residual Confounding

Dan B

[ Post Comment ]

http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v287n9/fpdf/jed20003.pdf

[ Post Comment ]

http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v287n9/rpdf/joc11416.pdf

[ Post Comment ]

Cannabis, Cognition, and Residual Confounding http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v287n9/ffull/jed20003.html

[ Post Comment ]

Pot has been used for thousands of years; that's long-term.

[ Post Comment ]

Rainbow

[ Post Comment ]

[ Post Comment ]

• http://www.norml.org/news/index.shtml#story1

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

[ Post Comment ]

See the ad: http://www.americanlibertyfoundation.org/second.htm

[ Post Comment ]

Alcohol for adults is legal. Cannabis is not.

[ Post Comment ]

Furthermore, is the University of New South Wales funded by the state? If so, it would seem that the University has an incentive to produce findings that would satisfy the state(to receive more funding to produce more bogus findings).

[ Post Comment ]