Cannabis News The November Coalition
  Federal Use of Informant Criticized
Posted by FoM on March 03, 2002 at 08:54:42 PT
By Shelley Murphy, Globe Staff 
Source: Boston Globe 

justice Despite adopting sweeping new guidelines a year ago that tightened the rules for handling informants, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies continued to use an admitted drug dealer and con man to set up stings against other people, according to interviews with the informant.

The informant told the Globe he has evaded jail since the 1950s, when he served a year for a Medford home invasion, because agents gave him ''leeway'' to commit crimes in exchange for information about gangsters, drug dealers, bank robbers, and art thieves.

Although he was arrested in 1993 on charges of defrauding a Boston hotel, the informant said he resolved the case by agreeing to pay his $30,000 hotel bill.

The informant, who was recruited 40 years ago by the same FBI agent who brought notorious gangster Stephen ''The Rifleman'' Flemmi into the fold, was finally dropped by federal officials last month after reporting that he had been stealing prescription drugs and giving them to one of his handlers, a US Customs agent. He also accused the agent of extorting more than $150,000 from him.

And recently, federal prosecutors launched a separate investigation into allegations that the informant tried to taint a probe of Teamsters Local 25 last year by fabricating corruption allegations against an agent assigned to that case, according to law enforcement officials.

The allegations have raised questions about whether the US Justice Department has succeeded in cleaning house since the FBI's relationship with Flemmi and James ''Whitey'' Bulger, now charged with killing 21 people between them, was exposed in 1998 during federal court hearings in Boston.

''Based on everything we know about Bulger and Flemmi, it would be a tragedy if the Justice Department failed to learn from its mistakes,'' said Representative Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican who chairs a congressional committee investigating the FBI's use of informants. ''This is something the committee will look into.''

FBI and US Customs Service officials declined to discuss the case. But during recent interviews, the informant - who asked that his name be withheld for fear of his safety - said he manipulated the system for years, informing on others to clear the way for his own crimes.

The informant who said he has gone by various code names, including ''Dunkin' Donuts,'' said he made a living selling information to the government, while also selling heroin, cocaine, and marijuana and concocting ''swindles and frauds.''

''When you're doing something bad and something is going to happen, you run and give the people up,'' said the informant, insisting that agents knew he was involved in criminal activity but didn't talk about it.

In one case, he allegedly bilked a Fall River police dispatcher out of $400,000 through phony investment schemes, then orchestrated an FBI sting of the man on gun charges, according to federal court records. An FBI agent revealed in court last year that the informant had implicated himself and the dispatcher in a series of home invasions a decade ago that targeted drug dealers, but the charges weren't investigated.

The FBI, under its new guidelines, isn't supposed to work with people committing crimes, unless they have been authorized in writing for a specific period of time. FBI officials would not disclose whether the informant was reevaluated under the new Justice Department guidelines that call for a review of all criminals who have worked as informants for six years.

US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan also declined to comment on the informant, but underscored the line that law enforcement continues to walk in dealing with people who peddle information.

''If somebody showed up on the doorstep of law enforcement or the US attorney's office and suggested they had information that could significantly improve public safety, like deter the next World Trade Center bombing, we wouldn't ignore that information, even if the person had a serious criminal history,'' Sullivan said.

However, Sullivan added, investigators must corroborate information and make sure their sources are credible.

The informant, a fourth-grade dropout, grew up in Boston's West End and was recruited in 1962 by FBI agent H. Paul Rico. The informant said Rico caught him with two machine guns, but agreed not to arrest him if he informed on others. The informant said he promptly gave up two mobsters on heroin charges.

Rico is the same agent who was chastised by Burton's committee last year for his handling of informants and is currently being targeted by a federal grand jury investigating alleged FBI misconduct. Rico's lawyer said Friday his client declined to comment.

While the informant insists he's always told the truth, he was briefly dropped by the FBI in the 1960s because of credibility problems, according to court documents. He was also investigated by the FBI for perjury in 1970 after he testified for the defense to discredit a key government witness at the armored car robbery trial of Boston Mafia boss Gennaro ''Jerry'' Angiulo, who was acquitted.

Still, he managed to get back into the informant program, offering information over the years on everything from the 1990 heist of $200 million in paintings stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum to organized crime, according to federal court documents.

Several years ago, he agreed to become a government witness, lured, he said, by promises that if he helped convict wealthy criminals, he could reap as much as 25 percent of all assets seized in those cases under federal forfeiture laws.

''Do you know how easy it is to entice somebody?'' said the informant, who for the past few years worked with a multi-agency task force that included the FBI, US Customs, and State Police.

The informant said an FBI agent introduced him to David McClanahan, a US Customs agent who suggested they sting Shirley Sack, a Manhattan art dealer. Sack was convicted in 1978 of fencing paintings that had been stolen from the home of Harvard president Derek Bok.

The informant arranged for Sack and another art dealer to sell paintings valued at $4.1 million to an undercover agent posing as a drug dealer, leading to Sack's arrest in Boston last May on money laundering charges.

The informant has been paid $30,000 for his work on the Sack case and said he's been promised as much as $250,000 if the paintings are forfeited to the government.

But federal law enforcement officials said that case could be in jeopardy because of an investigation into allegations that surfaced after McClanahan crashed into a parked car in Bridgewater last September and drugs were found in his system. After the accident, the informant said, he told a Customs supervisor that he had been stealing prescription painkillers from a Braintree doctor's office and giving them to McClanahan.

He also claimed McClanahan had extorted more than $150,000 from him over 18 months, allegedly to buy drugs and a new car, and to fix an investigation into the informant's illegal activities.

Both McClanahan and his lawyer, Peter Noone, declined to comment on the allegations. Robin Avers, the special agent in charge of US Customs' Boston office, declined to discuss the investigation, other than to say that McClanahan is still employed by the agency.

While the investigation is continuing, McClanahan recently returned to work after a five-month leave, law enforcement officials said.

''It is unbelievable that federal law enforcement agencies continue to use informants of this type and nature, knowing the scandals that they have created and the disrepute they bring to the credibility of federal law enforcement,'' said Boston lawyer Stephen Delinsky, who represents Sack and claims the informant entrapped her after borrowing $15,000.

After federal prosecutors arrested the Fall River dispatcher last year on charges of selling guns to the informant, they reduced the charges and agreed not to seek jail time under a plea agreement. The deal was struck after the dispatcher, Nuno Barboza, claimed the informant swindled him out of $400,000 on phony investments and then used the government to entrap him.

''It's like the tail wagging the dog here,'' said lawyer Benjamin Entine, who represents Barboza. ''The informant is feeding the FBI what the informant wants them to know and is getting away with whatever he wants to do under the cover of the relationship.''

In September 2000, Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly's office investigated complaints from several investors who lost money to the informant, but prosecutors decided not to pursue charges because many allegations were too old and there were other problems with the case, according to a state prosecutor.

The informant continued working cases for the government until Jan. 22, when US Customs sent a letter notifying him he had been dropped because federal prosecutors wouldn't take any new cases he was involved in.

The letter, which the informant provided to the Globe, said, ''The United States Attorney's office arrived at this decision based upon what they believe is a fact pattern depicting your lack of candor, credibility and veracity.''

Judy Rakowsky of the Globe Staff contributed to this report.

This story ran on page B1 of the Boston Globe on 3/3/2002.

Source: Boston Globe (MA)
Author: Shelley Murphy, Globe Staff
Published: March 3, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Globe Newspaper Company
Contact: letter@globe.com
Website: http://www.boston.com/globe/

CannabisNews Justice Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/justice.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #5 posted by Jose Melendez on March 03, 2002 at 12:44:04 PT:

thanks
I understand, thank you. Maybe the simple fact that I posted the discussion will inspire debate within Treasury or Justice.

Peace.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by Rainbow on March 03, 2002 at 11:24:17 PT
I guess all the govt. Orgs need a police
You are probably right but I associated the SS with our president since that is one of their jobs.

I imagine the Treasury Department is a place holder for the SS organization is all.

He did not say he was a Secret Service agent he said he was a Treasury department employee. So I guess he did not lie just did not tell the complete story.

I would still watch out.

Rainbow

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Jose Melendez on March 03, 2002 at 10:48:23 PT:

make them answer the truth
When did he lie? Secret Service is Treasury department, no?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Rainbow on March 03, 2002 at 10:44:27 PT
Watchout
Jose

Secret Service (SS) means most anything. This guy is probably not out for fun, he is investigating something.

Watch your back and be careful and don't trust these SS guys.

He lied to you and I guess that speaks volumes. One can not trust the SS, FBI, NI, AI, Dea(th), or anyother government police.

Rainbow

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Jose Melendez on March 03, 2002 at 09:48:32 PT:

Thanks
There is a Treasury Department Agent here attending a skills camp hosted by the skydiving drop zone I jump at. I asked him the other night about RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) and he said "I'm not with FBI."

I get it now... maybe he thought I meant FBI agent H. Paul Rico.

He kind of zoned out when I mentioned that marijuana was illegally criminalized in the late 1930's, and improperly scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act. He snapped out of it when I pointed out the word treason, then nodded acknowledging my point that war on U.S. citizens is exactly that.

The best part is that I found out later (through paperwork he filed) that he is actually Secret Service.

I can just hear the water cooler talk at work now, "Would you believe that little pothead thinks drug war is treason?" "Well, maybe in a sense, he's right. 6 million killed using legal drugs each decade while another 7 million or more are behind bars for marijuana? Hmmm..."

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 03, 2002 at 08:54:42