Cannabis News Stop the Drug War!
  Supporter of Medicinal Marijuana Chooses Activism
Posted by FoM on February 17, 2002 at 10:49:54 PT
By Emi Kojima, The Roanoke Times 
Source: Roanoke Times 

medical Without his medicine, 39-year-old Michael Krawitz loses his appetite from nausea. He gets depressed and fears he could lose the sight in his right eye.

Most of the time he feels pain - stomach spasms, awful cramping, shooting pressure down to his right knee - that's been with him since he fell off a motorcycle almost two decades ago. But sometimes the pain becomes sharp and unbearable. Then all Krawitz wants is his medicine to dull the pain and help him eat.

His health isn't the Montgomery County man's only problem. For taking his wonder drug, cannabis, Krawitz could face punishment for a misdemeanor: 30 days' jail time, a $500 fine and suspension of his driver's license for six months.

So instead, Krawitz takes oxycodone and Marinol , the only legal prescription drug that contains the same psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. But he said the drug doesn't provide the same relief that cannabis does, and it makes him queasy and uncomfortable.

Krawitz said he had to make a choice. He could quietly get the cannabis to treat his illness, or he could be an activist. He chose activism and is now one of the most prominent Virginia cannabis supporters and part of a community of about 500 to 1,000 nationally known marijuana activists nationwide, said Steven Wishnia , senior editor of High Times magazine.

Eighteen years ago, Krawitz had a motorcycle accident while he was stationed in Guam with the Air Force. The accident left him with two artificial hips, a metal plate in his arm, and part of his stomach and intestines had to be removed. He was flown to Hawaii, where he spent months receiving and recovering from 11 surgeries.

One day, when he was complaining about how miserable he felt, another patient quieted him by offering Krawitz the end of a marijuana joint.

"I tried that and it was pretty amazing," Krawitz said. "All of a sudden, I wasn't nauseous and the pain was gone. There was a change in my spirit: It changed my outlook completely, and my motivation increased. I looked forward to every day."

The marijuana helped the pain subside and his appetite and attitude improve, Krawitz said. When he traveled to the Netherlands, he said, a doctor wrote him a prescription for cannabis. He began researching the plant in his first years at Virginia Tech. In 1997, he started working with the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws.

He ran the Virginia Tech chapter of NORML from 1998 to 2000 and participated in other groups that support medicinal marijuana use: the November Coalition, Patients Out of Time and Virginians Against Drug Violence.

In June, Krawitz traveled to Chicago as the sole patient to testify on the medical benefits of marijuana before a special committee hearing of the American Medical Association, when it considered backing marijuana use as a last resort for seriously ill patients.

Although it didn't formally support this original measure, the AMA did endorse "the free and unfettered exchange of information on treatment alternatives" and suggested doctors and patients shouldn't be prosecuted for using marijuana medicinally.

Despite Krawitz's activism, he said marijuana should be treated like a medicine and not a recreational drug.

If he catches his daughter, now 8, with it before she turns 21, "she'd have hell to pay," he said with a smile.

News researcher Belinda Harris contributed to this report.

Note: To alleviate his pain caused by a motorcycle accident, Michael Krawitz takes both oxycodone and Marinol.

Complete Title: Supporter of Medicinal Marijuana Chooses Activism over Cannabis

Source: Roanoke Times (VA)
Author: Emi Kojima, The Roanoke Times
Published: Sunday, February 17, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Roanoke Times
Contact: karent@roanoke.com
Website: http://www.roanoke.com/roatimes/

NORML
http://www.norml.org/

Drug Policy Forum of Virginia
http://www.drugsense.org/dpfva/

Patients Out of Time
http://www.medicalcannabis.com/

Medical Marijuana Information Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/medical.htm

CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #13 posted by kaptinemo on February 19, 2002 at 13:06:44 PT
Hi, Doc! Good to see ya, again!
I've seen your posts a few times since I returned to my home base, but never realized how busy you must be. Hope things are going well for you!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by Mr X on February 19, 2002 at 00:42:54 PT
Experience tells all!
To anyone who has ever smoked marijuana, its medicinal effects are common sense. Any substance that mellows the mind, and body, and makes you feel downright "good" could have medicinal value.

solution? Everybody must get stoned!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by freedom fighter on February 18, 2002 at 16:18:48 PT
650$ an oz?
That's a true criminal thing to do to human beings..

Going rate in my area is 350-400 an oz..

Gotta grow more..

I helped a friend of mine who got med-pot card set up his grow room. The four white shark and the two hashplants are blooming. I felt good helpin a friend in need.

take care

ff

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by el_toonces on February 18, 2002 at 11:06:27 PT:

Please change title of #5, infra......
I unfortuantely did not title my comment number 5, infra, as I should have. Please read it instead as: "Pharmacokinetics as important as any particular cannibinoid ligand?"

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by el_toonces on February 18, 2002 at 10:54:18 PT:

Sorry, E_J
E --

Sorry. I did not mean to lecture you or in any way imply, infer or intimate that your knowledge of cannibinoids or any use you make of that knowledge to meet your medical needs is at all lacking. I agree with you 100% about how each person has to find their own medical MJ "regimen" (my vocabulary being insufficient at the moment and thus unable to supply a better term). In fact, I wish politicians and some researchers and clinicians would trust people a little better in providing access to any and all meds that an individual patient finds to help his or her situation.

My main concern was that someone like our "friend" Joyce would see such a post as yours and fit it into the old "they have a pill already" argument (id este, that old "they must be for kids smoking pot because they already have a 'pot pill' and if that's not good enough for them we can add some more 'dope ingredients' to the pill lest these pesky ill folks complain more") by arguing that medi-pot is not needed because pain and spasticity could be controlled by the "pot pill" we already have just by adding some CBD to the pill.

I sincerely regret you took offense at the post or took it as an admonition directed at you and that is my fault for titling it the way I did. On the other hand, I am very glad I got to read your second post because it's caused me to evaluate how I might more effectively employ this herb. Inhaling provides me with excellent relief from nausea but not pain, as I have lamented here and elsewhere; narcotics have nasty side effects, for me at least.

I am now wondering whether eating the stuff or drinking it in tea would provide more pain relief, especially since my pain is abdominal, digestive pain from a volcanic pancreas that refuses to die completely. Of course, oral use would mean I would need to be able to locate, purchase, & afford more magical herb. In my area, good stuff is hard to find (last time I had to re-supply, I could only find super-high potency stuff) and prohibitively expensive ($650 oz. this last time, well above the usual rate).

At least now, though, I can begin the process of finding some lower cost herb to experiment with p.o. and maybe keep handy in case I get the "queasies" in a public place where I can't find an airtight or quiet, unnoticed and unpoliced spot to inhale.

Again, my apologies for not thinking out my title and my thanks for expanding my view of how I might get even more benefit from this herb. I hope this finds you well:)

El

(PS -- I loved your posts on Chomsky -- whether the others found them relevant or not -- and share your view that he is being less than candid about the USSR. But, then again, I have had a beef with Chomsky since he was likewise disingenuous in his dismissals of Quine's naturalized epistemology, esp. the arguments Quine based upon the philosophy of language.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by FoM on February 18, 2002 at 09:29:59 PT
Dr. Russo
I appreciate your telling us that you are busy and will read even if you don't have time to comment. Keep up the great work you are doing. I sure appreciate you and I know others do too!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Ethan Russo MD on February 18, 2002 at 09:25:48 PT:

Site Suggestion/Personal Note
Dear CNews Denizens, Picking up the thread from a prior posting, I would suggest a visit to the GW Pharmaceuticals site: http://gwpharm.com

Then, click the link under GW plc Preliminary Results for an audio webcast. The "Clinical Update" is of the most interest. This indicates that by September 20, 2001, the company had information on 80 patient-years of use of CMBE (cannabis-based medicine extracts). These produced marked symptom improvement in MS, pain, urinary problems, sleep, etc. Side-effects were minimal. Patients, once stabilized, did not need dosage escalations. Patients are using whole cannabis extracts that include the flavonoids and terpenoids. These emphasize THC or CBD content, or combine the two. These studies go a long way to explaining how cannabis is a much better medicine than oral THC alone (Marinol). This material works very well in patients who have failed all conventional treatments. Cannabis is medicine. Show this data to all who will listen.

A personal note: I have been sparse in my postings of late, but have been lurking in the background. Please rest assured that I am working feverishly on various cannabis-related projects, but have to budget my time more than ever. I will be watching, but only post from time to time. I hope you will all continue your activism.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by E_Johnson on February 18, 2002 at 08:30:36 PT
Don't lecture me about this topic!!! Please
I'm an experienced medicsal user, I don't actually need instruction on the self-titration party line dude.

I eat marijuana cookies, because there is a benefit to eating for me that smoking doesn't give. I have had chronic bladder irritation since 1991. ONLY eating cannabinoids will help this, smoking does not do much.

Marinol actually works fairly well for this but marijuana cookies with both THc and CBD works far far better.

The self-itration is not "critical" for my bladder usage because that is a chronic problem, it builds up over time and it is perfectly fine to treat it with something administered through eating.

Also eating works better for fibromyalgia than smoking does.

In my experience.

I have my own best dose figured out. The only adjustments I need to make in the form of "self-titration" are to increase by one cookie a day if I am under extra stress.

I seem to be able to feel that well enough to know when I need one extra cookie.

Please I do not need to be instructed into the Party Line here.

My original comments stand. They could add CBD to THC in marinol and it would probably work fine for the uses where eating is actually better than smoking.

For bladder inflammation or pain or tension or spasm -- eating a marijuana cookie with a cup of tea and a glass of water brings relief in about 15 minutes.

I have personal experience in how smoking just doesn't do it for this use.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by el_toonces on February 17, 2002 at 22:40:46 PT:

EJ - 'Taint as simple as addin' as dash of CBD:(
"Why can't the makers of Marinol just include some CBD in the formula? I just don't understand that at all."

It would not work well, IMHO, EJ, as the pill form of THC, CBD, or any other compound, will not allow the patient to "self-titrate" -- to ingest just enough to quell the nausea and pain and help the outlook without getting totally "stoned" and unproductive. Only smoking it or a vaporizer or an extract like Dr. Guy is researching in the UK (i.e., a mode of administration that bypasses the gut) will allow for this critical self-titration.

If I took Marinol by mouth like this guy, I would be so zoned I could not be active enough to care for myself, let alone be activist for MJ law reform. Hey, ya' think maybe that's why this high THC content pill is Schedule III (so loosely regulated it can phoned into the pharmacy, unlike my tightly controlled pain meds), while the plant it naturally comes from is Schedule I, no legitimate medical use?

That is weird that the more concentrated pill form that contains more THC (which ONDCP says makes it unsafe and "not you father's pot" because it is more "potent" than schwag of old) is Schedule III and thus by definition has a medical use, while the plant from which THC comes in lower concentrations, is listed as Schedule I, with no medical use. They use word games and cheap semantics to confuse folks and it's pissin' me off (and scaring me, esp. after what the Feds did last week is Calif.):(

Pax vobiscum,

El



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by el_toonces on February 17, 2002 at 22:19:00 PT:

why th choice needed?
"Krawitz said he had to make a choice. He could quietly get the cannabis to treat his illness, or he could be an activist."

Does anyone have any thoughts on WHY this man had to choose between what the author implies are mutually exclusive options? AS far as I can tell, the article makes no attempt to flesh this out.

Any thoughts?

(Reason I ask is I am in this guy's shoes somewhat -- terrible pain and nausea from pancreatitis for which I get Rx opiates (due to hysteria, will not mention brand names), which help with the pain but make the nausea worse, but the docs have a fit and threaten to cut off my pain meds if they "find MJ" in my system (they won't look to hard I think), yet MJ helps so much with appetite and nausea, the thought of going without both is unpalatable. If only MJ would work like opiates on pain!

I do have some thoughts about the fear folks like me have that we could lose one or both of our needed meds if we get too loud about this -- notwithstanding the truism that a good activist is a loud one -- yet we feel powerless unless we do speak out. The prohibitionist pols have created the worst oppression by using the legal leverage they have over our docs, who need the pols permission to write pain meds, to intimidate the docs from advocating real reform like MJ re-scheduling.

Peace all:)

El

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by goneposthole on February 17, 2002 at 13:07:28 PT
sole patient
If the AMA would make a plea for individuals to testify if they benefited positively from marijuana use, all would be necessary would be to set up a table with a microphone and a guarantee of immunity from prosecution, lines would form and remain there for days.

It is a medicinal herb, and it just happens to have receational value, too. Those two values were discovered many eons ago. Sorry prohibitionists, berate and belittle all you can and all you want, you will never be able to change or alter its presence as a useful medicine and a natural substance useful for recreation. Put that in your noosphere, your brain matter can handle it.

There is nothing wrong or inconsistent if it is used for both purposes.

The gist of this story is disturbing and unsettling, it's been 'fettered'.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by goneposthole on February 17, 2002 at 12:35:06 PT
Michael Krawitz
>One day, when he was complaining about how miserable he felt, another patient quieted him by offering Krawitz the end of a marijuana joint.

"I tried that and it was pretty amazing," Krawitz said. "All of a sudden. I wasn't nauseous and the pain was gone. There was a change in my spirit: It changed my outlook completely and my motivation increased. I looked forward to everyday."<

Is this what you call 'anecdotal evidence'?

How about all of the 'scientific studies' that are conducted to attempt to determine if marijuana has any medicinal value, do the 'scientists' seek anecdotal evidence when reporting 'impirical data'? If not, why not?

These 'studies' remind me of the movie "THE JERK." The scene where Navin R. Johnson is a carnival worker barking at carnival goers to have their age guessed and the like comes to mind. When he incorrectly guessed your age, you were given the choice of any prize on two shelves of cheap items. Any of the prizes of any worth were not available as a choice.

The same is true of 'studies' conducted on the 'medicinal value' of marijuana. Any study that proves marijuana's medicinal value is berated and belittled in an effort to 'cheapen' it's worth. It's value has no worth. Whereas, the government sanctioned 'studies' which 'prove' that marijuana has 'no' medicinal value are of 'enormous' value. Truth is, not the least expensive, but the cheapest prize on the shelves. That's what they are.

The true studies that do prove that marijuana does have medicinal value remain on the shelves unavailable for anyone to 'have'. The same is true of marijuana, it is the prize of the most value standing on one of the shelves from which no one can choose.

If Klaus Kinski could shake his chains, I can shake mine.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by E_Johnson on February 17, 2002 at 11:13:16 PT
THC needs CBD
So instead, Krawitz takes oxycodone and Marinol , the only legal prescription drug that contains the same psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. But he said the drug doesn't provide the same relief that cannabis does, and it makes him queasy and uncomfortable.

Why can't the makers of Marinol just include some CBD in the formula? I just don't understand that at all.

Marijuana prohibition is so completely irrational. THC is supposed to be the Evil Molecule, so evil we can't risk eating a hemp seed now.

But then they go ahead and make Marinol out of pure THC, and treat the CBD like it does nothing because it's "not psychoactive".

Well it IS psychoactive in the sense that it has a nice modulating effect on the way the THC acts in the brain.

This whole system is bass-ackwards.

We can't have cannabis because it has THC, but really the thing that makes cannabis different from Marinol is that the THC comes with competing cannabinoids that modulate the so-called "high" and make it less disorienting and less mind-altering.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on February 17, 2002 at 10:49:54