Cannabis News Marijuana Policy Project
  Pricey Prime Time Propaganda
Posted by FoM on February 02, 2002 at 08:41:20 PT
By Zara Gelsey  
Source: Alchemind Society 

justice As approximately forty percent of American households are gearing up for game day, the Drug Czar and his Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) are prepared to make use of the Super Bowl’s enormous audience to disseminate a damaging and discriminatory message: if you use illegal drugs, then you support terrorism. The ONDCP has reportedly purchased two 30-second spots for the whopping price of $1.6 million apiece. Touted as being the biggest single-event government advertising buy in U.S. history (www.adage.com), it is clear that this campaign means business.

What isn’t clear is the intended effect of this campaign. Ostensibly, the government is trying to shame Americans who use illegal drugs into deeming their actions as unpatriotic and terrorist-supporting. On closer examination, however, the intent of the ads may be an appeal, not to drug users (whose marginalized position makes them less likely to feel compelled to please the government anyway), but to already fervently “patriotic” Americans who are being told to treat drug users as supporters of terrorism.

Yet the ONDCP seems to be oblivious to the fact that it is not users of illegal drugs who are supporting terrorism, but the ONDCP’s own prohibition policies. By its very nature, drug prohibition creates inflated prices and a black market through which billions of untraceable dollars flow. One need only look at the failure of alcohol prohibition, which created domestic terrorists like Al Capone, to see that it is not alcohol and other drugs, but rather prohibition that feeds the coffers of terrorism.

As proof that drug prohibition, rather than drug users, funds terrorist activities, one need only note that beer-maker Anheuser-Busch Co. has purchased ten Super Bowl ad spaces, far more than any other advertiser. Alcohol is a drug, yet profits from its sale make American companies rich rather than terrorists because alcohol is no longer subject to prohibition.

Another disturbing facet of the ONDCP’s multi-million dollar advertisement campaign is the magnitude of money, which could be better spent. According to NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse), the average cost for a full year of methadone maintenance treatment is approximately $4,700 per patient. That means that for the cost of these two ad spots, not including production costs, the government could instead be treating 680 heroin addicts. For an agency that designates as one of its foci, to “reduce health and social costs to the public of illegal drug use by reducing the treatment gap,” this expenditure on propaganda seems ludicrous. But then again ONDCP’s entire drug prohibition policy is ludicrous.

Americans have used drugs for centuries and will continue to do so. By restricting individual choice in the matter of what one takes to alter his or her consciousness, our national drug policy stomps on the exact freedoms it claims to protect. Rather than paint illegal drug use as unpatriotic, the U.S. government should recognize that the freedom to control one’s own consciousness is a fundamental right—one which a rational and sustainable drug policy must acknowledge and respect.

Zara Gelsey: zara@cognitiveliberty.org is the Director of Communications for the Alchemind Society: The International Association for Cognitive Liberty.

To let the ONDCP know of your reaction to their campaign, you can send an email from: http://www.mediacampaign.org/contact/index.html or http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/contact/index.html

Complete Title: Pricey Prime Time Propaganda: Anti-Drug Adverts and The Super Bowl

Source: Alchemind Society (CA)
Author: Zara Gelsey
Published: February 01, 2002
Copyright: 2002 Alchemind Society
Contact: info@alchemind.org
Website: http://www.alchemind.org/

Related Articles:

Government's Anti-Drug Ads Labeled Super Bust
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11901.shtml

White House Spends 3.4M for Super Ads
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11898.shtml

White House Airing Super Bowl Ads
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11882.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #26 posted by freedom fighter on February 03, 2002 at 23:40:51 PT
Overgrow.com
listed 21,000 members and growing every week..

Nice to be able to get a card with famous leaf on it. I recall one bank in England that will only do business with companies that are environmental sensitive. I do not see why someone cannont set the business up in term of ending on "WOSD"

ff

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #25 posted by CollateralDamage on February 03, 2002 at 16:23:29 PT
good idea!
This needs to be thought out completely and then the message sent out to as many people as possible - put it on the cannabis/legalisation web-sites, forward it to mailing-lists etc, soon enough millions of people would know. Really think it could work...

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #24 posted by Lehder on February 03, 2002 at 13:34:39 PT
focusing resources against the drug war
I agree, FoM. There are so few people really interested in hard drugs - and there would be fewer still with mj legalized - that the wole drug war would collapse without mj prohibition.

People who support our cause have always been in total disarray, their energies and resources unfocused for fear of identifying themselves. It's understandable, and drug warriors bank on it.

But a credit or debit card system would focus the financial resources of millions of people, and lookinside's example shows how that money would add up. We all know that cannabis users are not lazy or irresponsible. They're productive and energetic, and as a group they have money and resources far in excess of their present representation. These resources need a channel for focusing on the drug war. Otherwise, true patriots will always be beaten down one at a time by armed SWAT goons and groups of dumb bullies who for but the drug war would be doing our yard work and hauling our trash.

Something like this ought to work, and the Lindesmith Center has access to business talent that can do it. I'll buy a debit card or begin using a credit card the day they're issued.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by p4me on February 03, 2002 at 10:48:09 PT
money for change
Lehder raised the issue of finances. The best idea I heard was for a 10-10-420 long distance service, although I do not see how a person would do it for any other reason than the desire to capitalize on the number.

I am reminded of a statement Bob Costas made on a TV interview about walkers in the Olympics. He said something hinting at the fact that it was not much sport to walk during his coverage of the Olympics and got all kinds of flack. He said they might not have much of a following but they sure are vocal.

As my stance becomes more hardened I feel compelled to take the case to people I come in contact with. Just yesterday a neighbor stopped to ask about buying a right-of-way and I could not help but mention that marijuana should be legal. I was in a car with a friend of mines brother and he wanted to stop at a convenience store and get soda and snack. I said I did not want anything because I tried not to involve myself in the economy whenever possible. They raised the 6% sales tax here in NC to 6 1/2 and I do not want them to have the money. Nor do I want to support the government by making any more money than possible because they will just waste it on Super Bowl ads and jail time for sick people. The peolpe that call on the phone are going to get a blast from now on.

The WOMJ is lost and the government just keeps issuing pain and suffering to our citizenry. The sad part is I cannot afford MJ and I say it is medicine to my chronic condition. It is time to be vocal. In March it will be time to vote.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by FoM on February 03, 2002 at 10:45:44 PT
lookinside
Here's the link to the Soros Foundation Network. I can't wait to see these ads today. I hope they are as dumb as I think they will be. Not egg in frying pan but egg on face maybe? LOL!

http://www.soros.org/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by FoM on February 03, 2002 at 10:43:07 PT
RavingDave
That is an excellent letter. Thanks for sharing it with all of us!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #20 posted by lookinside on February 03, 2002 at 10:32:00 PT:

RavingDave...
excellent letter!

Lehder: I hope someone here has a direct link to Soros...Your idea is an excellent one. The CC companies charge 3-4% for purchases. I run about $2000 through my cards. That's $60-80 bucks a month. A million people do that, We could run a 1/2 hour Infomercial during half time!

Jean just mentioned something: The BIG GAME IS FIXED! The Patriots MUST WIN. It would be UNAMERICAN to have any other outcome! I'll bet that GWB has a mill down with odds...LOL!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by FoM on February 03, 2002 at 09:44:03 PT
Lehder
We need money and we need to get into one mind set as how to accomplish what needs to be done. ( Not me or C News) My opinion is marijuana must be separated from hard drugs because it isn't dangerous. Cocaine, Heroin and many legal prescription drugs can kill a person but Marijuana can't. If the laws on Marijuana are changed the hard drug use will slowly go down I think.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #18 posted by Lehder on February 03, 2002 at 09:37:20 PT
credit and debit cards
Our movement lacks money. I'd like to see Soros and the Lindesmith Center or other capable organization issue debit cards that could be used by people opposed to the drug wars. Profits to go to appropriate organizations. We'd have the money for equal time spots on the Superbowl, and money for lawyers when we were denied equal time.

It's always eight SWAT pigs against one or two peaceful protesters. We need a way to focus collective financial power - that's what our movement lacks more than anything else. A card like this would soon have hundreds of millions in profits.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by goneposthole on February 03, 2002 at 07:06:36 PT
thrift
I do not want to end up wearing a pickle barrel, either.

I know how to make money, and plenty for others, too.

I've been doing it for quite some time, and people that I help are pleased with what I can do.

However, one way of doing business is to watch others go broke.

Overspending is bad medicine. Enron is a shining example.

Waste not, want not.

Look before you leap.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by Lehder on February 03, 2002 at 06:37:29 PT
dollars are mightier than votes
Pay your bills only when the money is demanded. Never on time.

I like your idea, posthole. I won't go so far as to louse up my credit rating, but your line of thought suggests another tactic to me.

I'm preparing a short letter that explains my frugality and I'm going to send it to each of the banks and companies that have issued me a credit card. I will further promise that the first among them that gathers the courage to publicly oppose the drug war will enjoy 100% of my purchases on credit.

A few months ago, an Internet company that hosts a web browser deleted my nicely worded comment critical of US policies. It had no problem letting stand a loutish retort from a name-calling superpatriot. I still use their web page and search engine, but wrote to them that I would never ever post another comment and I would never ever click on any of their ads. I've kept my word.

I'm expanding that tactic now, and will write to each of the main search engine hosts to explain that I am similarly boycotting them. And the first of these companies that takes a public stance against the drug war will become my browser's home page.

They may not count our votes, but they do count dollars and clicks.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by goneposthole on February 03, 2002 at 05:50:30 PT
Hide your assets
If you have money, do not spend it.

Pay your bills only when the money is demanded. Never on time.

Corporations will experience a cash flow crunch which will bend them severely.

Reduce your consumption to a bare minimum.

The house of cards will fall.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by Lehder on February 03, 2002 at 05:31:58 PT
consumers and taxpayers
Consumers and taxpayers fund terrorism. They fund the insufferable federal goverment and the oppressive corporations that are spreading violence poverty over the globe.

Reduce your income to a level that is untaxable. Reduce your consumption. Take the money away.

Vote them out.

Confront a drug war sympathizer with the truth today. Get in their faces. They are our families, colleagues, employers, and neighbors who are allowing this beast to rage.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by goneposthole on February 03, 2002 at 05:21:22 PT
The Ministry of Truth
and The Ministry of Vice and Virtue will be reviewing RavingDave's case.

I will tell you that you have been slated as a raving lunatic.

Best of luck

Must order more truth serum, it is running low. Guantanamo Bay and all.

Enough of this ability to reason and have arguments that make sense. What is needed is eco slaves (prisoners) and automatonic drones, don't you know.

Now, get back to work.

"Work, work, work, work, work, work, work."

Have a nice day in your very special concentration camp.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by mayan on February 03, 2002 at 02:30:51 PT
Bravo,Raving Dave!!!
That is an excellent letter RavingDave! You couldn't have put it better!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #11 posted by RavingDave on February 02, 2002 at 23:54:41 PT
Letter to ONDCP
Here's a copy of the (anonymous) letter I sent to ONDCP. It'll probably fall on deaf ears, but I feel better anyway. ------------

Dear Sirs:

I am writing to express my extreme disdain for your ad placement during the Super Bowl. I find it insulting to my intelligence that you should use my tax money to tell outright lies to me on television.

Your office has a continuing policy of ignoring plain facts. I am speaking specifically about the way you are trying to relate illicit drug use to terrorism. It is a very well-documented fact that it is not the use of illicit substances which fund terrorism, but rather the misguided policy of prohibition, which creates the artificial prices and black market which enable so much money to be made. Probably the same would happen for any thing which is made illegal, and which is still craved by numerous people.

My point is that if you are not aware of these facts, then you have no business making "policy" concerning drugs. If you are (which I assume) aware of these facts, then you are perpetuating a lie which destroys families and, yes, kills people - for it is your office and others like you which are funding terrorists, not drug users.

Drug users are simply exercising their constitutionally guaranteed right to the pursuit of happiness, a right which you and your ilk seem bent on revoking or destroying whenever possible.

It is precisely because of these reprehensible policies that I live in terror, fearing for my life and that of my family, lest some zealot (ie. patriot) should come kick my door down and haul me away for expressing "un-American" views. Note that since you are causing me to live in terror, you are thus a de-facto terrorist.

How does it feel to be accused of being a supporter of terrorism? Well, at least I'm not using your money in order to implicate you.

Signed, a tax-paying American (never forget it)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by john wayne on February 02, 2002 at 17:37:25 PT
of human bondage
Within a short time terrorism charges will be trumped up when a person is caught smoking cannabis. If they grew the cannabis themselves, they will be charged with "running a terrorist-funding enterprise".

The cases will be tried by secret tribunal, and the sentence will be indeterminate, consisting of forced labor telemarketing outfits, with every "sale" a tick towards release. The release will only be an illusion as prisoners will also be charged for their bondage and the best part is that no one on the outside will complain, because we are, after all talking about terrorists.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by goneposthole on February 02, 2002 at 17:01:59 PT
it's the cops
If the TV scenes of the police using crowd conrol on the demonstrators in NYC during the World Economic Forum is any indication of what is in store then welcome to the police state.

Mind Control tactics at work.

Now quit thinking, get back to work. The state where you reside is now a concentration camp.

If you remain complacent, we will let you live awhile.

"Arbeit macht frei."

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by FoM on February 02, 2002 at 13:05:00 PT
The Right Wing
I seem to remember Bush senior saying that. The Republicans are controlled by the Christian Right. They don't side step how they feel about non believers. Get rid of them ( lock them up) or convert them. One or the other.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Lehder on February 02, 2002 at 12:49:08 PT
atheists and citizenship
The quote is from George Bush #1 during the 1987 presidential campaign.

Sherman: What will you do to win the votes of the Americans who are atheists?

Bush: I guess I'm pretty weak in the atheist community. Faith in god is important to me.

Sherman: Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?

Bush: No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.

http://www.holysmoke.org/sdhok/aa011.htm

How many other classes of non-citizens could the Bushes identify? I don't know, I expect we're gonna find out.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by i420 on February 02, 2002 at 12:34:19 PT
What a waste...
How many roofs could this money have put over homeless people?? How many starving children could this money have fed??? How many books could this money have bought for school?? How many schools could this money have built??? Hope your really proud ONDCP.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on February 02, 2002 at 11:50:07 PT
p4me
I can't drink. I had no sense when I drank alcohol. The weird thing is I hate alcohol because my mom had a terrible drinking problem and I hated myself when I drank because I saw I was acting just like my mom did and that wasn't nice for me at all. When I drank I could drink anyone under the table even though I only drank for a short time in my life. I could easily consume 24 beers a day and I'm a small person and still would be walking. I realized then that my drinking was not like people who can drink now and then. I couldn't. I would drink 24 hours a day if I could. Needless to say I was on a self destruct path but I survived and thank goodness Cannabis was available and it saved me. I wouldn't have made it without it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by p4me on February 02, 2002 at 11:29:41 PT
an article where reasoning is important
The result of this 3.2 million waste of money may be the unleashing of the free minds of this country with articles like this. We have got to do something about alcohol addiction and abuse in this country. There is only one state facility here in North Carolina for helping alcoholics and an alcoholic could not get in because of the waiting list. Remember the article here about the California man arrested in Utah with his medical MJ and they arrested him. That man was a California MMJ patient that took MJ for his alcohol dependency.

If I had a child today I would be sure and tell him smoke all the MJ you want but stay away from alcohol and places where people consume alcohol. It is the wrong crowd. I do not keep alcohol at my place nor do I let people consume it here. I am old enough to know that alcohol and drunks are just bad news. Legalize MJ and the alcohol problem will be lessened if for no other reason those trying to escape its control will have a simple alternative with almost no side effects.

In a comment in a following article, I think it was goneposthole that mentioned the link http://www.deism.com and the following quote by George Bush(which one?. Where can I find a source for such a ludicrious statement? "I dont't know that athiests should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."- George Bush

Vote against all incumbents and overgrow the government with high quality MJ.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by FoM on February 02, 2002 at 11:28:45 PT
I saw the article
I knew she wouldn't get anything for what she did. I hope writers will do articles on how unfair it is. I hope she gets the help she needs. She has a chance unlike the majority of addicted people. It just isn't fair and I don't know why society doesn't seem to care. We must make them care.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by lookinside on February 02, 2002 at 11:06:50 PT:

LOL!
Is it fair to blame the rich and powerful for using their influence to protect their kids?

I guess it comes down to how they've treated other people's children.

in this case I think Jeb's daughter should be burned at the stake!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Robbie on February 02, 2002 at 10:36:56 PT
No jail time for governor's daughter
http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbpost/epaper/editions/today/news_c3b5f72b552622a000c3.html

By Michael Van Sickler, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Saturday, February 2, 2002

TALLAHASSEE -- The state attorney's office won't seek jail time for the daughter of Gov. Jeb Bush, after she was arrested this week on a felony charge of prescription drug fraud, State Attorney Willie Meggs said on Friday.

Instead of the maximum five years in prison, Noelle Bush, 24, is facing mandatory attendance at a Leon County drug court for up to 18 months, Meggs said.

.........more.............

Is this justice? Would anyone else get the lesser option?

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on February 02, 2002 at 08:41:20