Cannabis News NORML - It's Time for a Change!
  U.S. Had Capability But Lacked Will
Posted by FoM on September 16, 2001 at 09:08:52 PT
By Mark Bowden, Knight Ridder Newspapers 
Source: Ledger-Enquirer  

justice The United States for years has had both the knowledge and capability necessary to kill exiled Saudi militant leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan, but repeatedly declined to act, angry U.S. intelligence officials and military special operations soldiers said last week.

Bin Laden's organization is the chief suspect in the attacks that leveled the World Trade Center towers, destroyed part of the Pentagon and crashed a hijacked plane in western Pennsylvania. According to intelligence officials, bin Laden is once again in hiding, having moved his training bases in the days before the attacks.

President Bush has vowed to pursue him and his far-flung network of terrorists if they are definitely linked to last week's attacks.

To some, this resolution comes too late.

"We have known his whereabouts with varying degrees of precision, everything from a few miles to a few feet, intermittently for the last few years," said one high-ranking intelligence official who asked not to be named. "Ever since Desert One (the failed hostage rescue mission to Tehran in 1979), this country has spent countless millions, and some fine young men have died in training, just to make sure we had a force capable of carrying out such missions. We did not act because both the Clinton administration and even the current administration never had the will to push it through."

American special forces troops and CIA operatives actually moved into Afghanistan on reconnaissance missions on several occasions, but were prohibited from moving against bin Laden.

Intelligence officials say authorization fell victim to White House concerns about reactions to such a raid from Arab nations, and a general reluctance to place American commandos in harm's way.

Bush administration officials did not immediately respond to the charge, but a top Clinton official dismissed it.

"It is categorically untrue," said Sandy Berger, Clinton's national security adviser during his second term. "We had contingency planning with various options concerning bin Laden, including all the ones you might imagine. We did have an aggressive surveillance enterprise continually, but at no point was there actionable intelligence, which would mean knowledge not only of where he might have been but where he was going to be."

Berger said that the Clinton administration "would have loved to go after bin Laden," but that "there was never a point where (Defense Secretary William) Cohen, (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs) Henry Shelton or any of the national security advisers feel that we had enough information to act."

Not Clinton's Fault

The key word seems to be "actionable." According to the special services officer, "you can keep setting the bar higher and higher, so that nothing ever gets done." By insisting on ever more specific targeting information, critics of the policy claim, cautious White House and Pentagon officials avoided authorizing a mission that might result in failure and its inevitable consequences - casualties and political criticism.

"The problem in the past hasn't been just at the top," said another former special forces officer. "People will get around to blaming Bill Clinton for refusing to pull the trigger, but in my experience he didn't necessarily shy away from making a decision. The problem was at the mid-levels of the military, where there has been a culture of risk-aversion. No one wanted to take a chance. Nobody wants to be the guy who authorizes a failed mission. Anybody who thinks that given the right level of resolve Osama bin Laden would still be with us today is just naive."

The army's top-secret Delta Force unit drew up plans and trained through the late 1990s to carry out raids in Afghanistan, a particularly difficult place to attack. The nearest staging area for an assault was 1,000 miles away, and the terrain was some of the most rugged in the world.

"We were ready to move," said a former Army special forces officer who helped draw up plans in 1998 against bin Laden. "We failed to receive an execute order from the president. The only way you can do something like this is to put people on the ground, and we were not allowed to do it because of this stubborn policy of risk avoidance. So out of concern for 60 Delta Force operators and SEALs who are ready and eager to perform the mission, we lose the thousands of people in the World Trade Center. It is a disgrace."

After bin Laden's group was linked to the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, President Clinton signed a policy directive authorizing the CIA to draw up a plan for going after bin Laden. Using human intelligence and high-tech spying, the movements of the Islamic fundamentalist group came under close surveillance. U.S. military and intelligence officers drew up detailed profiles of bin Laden's daily routines, where he slept, what kind of motorcade he used, and special operations units at Fort Bragg, N.C., drew up detailed plans to move against him.

"We've been prepared to do this kind of thing for years," said Wayne Downing, a retired Army general who is a former commander of U.S. special operations, and a former member of the National Commission on Terrorism. "But they have always been rejected as too aggressive and too risky."

New Demands

The United States did launch a major cruise missile attack on bin Laden in 1998 that reportedly killed as many as 30 members of his organization, but failed to hit him or cripple it. The missiles were launched in an effort to hit a meeting of high-level leaders of bin Laden's al Queda organization, possibly including bin Laden, but struck after the meeting had broken up.

After Tuesday's terrorist attacks against the United States, the Bush administration now faces demands for aggressive action. Congress has authorized $40 billion to the effort, and Bush has requested permission to call up 50,000 military reservists. Everywhere talk is of war.

But what kind of war?

A war against terrorism would take place on two major fronts. The first would involve going after the terrorists themselves. This involves intensive intelligence efforts to map the members of the suspected group worldwide, and locate them. Special forces troops, like the Army's Delta Force and the Navy's SEALS, would then conduct rapid, small-scale assaults, either arresting or killing their targets.

The second front would involve placing intense diplomatic and, if necessary, military pressure on states that support terrorism. Likely targets for such efforts are Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria and Iran.

Two recent examples of small-scale military action against a foreign enemy, not a state, took place in the early 1990s in Somalia and Colombia. In Somalia, U.S. special forces targeted clan leader Mohamed Farah Aidid, and in Colombia, they assisted that nation in going after the Medellin cocaine cartel boss Pablo Escobar. Both men were heads of large organizations. They stood, much as Osama Bin Laden does, at the top of a small mountain of supporters. Getting to them meant trying to take down the mountain.

In Colombia the process took about five years, beginning in 1989 with the introduction of U.S. special forces units, who worked with the Colombian National Police, the CIA and the Drug Enforcement Administration to map Escobar's far-flung, multi-billion-dollar organization. In the end, once the members of Escobar's organization were identified and located, a special unit of the Colombian police began rounding them up, arresting or killing them, and a vigilante squad calling itself Los PEPES ("People Persecuted by Pablo Escobar") assisted with a sustained murder campaign. The bloody, illegal tactics worked. Escobar was gradually stripped of his bankers, lawyers, gunmen, bombers, political supporters, and government collaborators. On Dec. 2, 1993, he was gunned down on a rooftop in Medellin.

Little attention was paid in the United States and rest of the world to the ruthlessness of the tactics employed against Escobar, and no one involved has ever been prosecuted for the murders committed by Los PEPES. Members of the U.S. special operations community see the effort as a textbook example of the difference between a strict law enforcement operation and war. Law enforcement is about bringing criminals to justice, and its agents are bound, in theory, to limit their pursuit to legal tactics. War is about defeating an enemy. It involves taking greater risks, and operating outside the rules of civil society. The only goal in war is to win.

"We've entered a new phase, and it's about time," said a former member of the U.S. Army's top secret counter-terrorism unit Delta Force, who was involved in hunt for Escobar. "For the last 10 years or more we all felt as though our hands were tied. Now it's finally down to going after the bad guys. We're moving from 'counter-terrorism' to 'anti-terrorism.' Counter-terrorism is about self-defense, basically responding after the fact. Anti-terrorism is about identifying threats and taking them out before they can they can act."

The Author:

Mark Bowden, a reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer, is author of the books "Blackhawk Down," about U.S. fighting in Mogadishu, Somalia, and "Killing Pablo," about the hunt for drug kingpin Pablo Escobar. Bowden has visited Columbus several times, for research and to sign books.

Complete Title: U.S. Had Capability but Lacked Will To Take Out bin Laden, Critics Say

Source: Ledger-Enquirer (GA)
Author: Mark Bowden, Knight Ridder Newspapers
Published: Sunday, September 16, 2001
Copyright: 2001 Ledger-Enquirer
Website: http://www.l-e-o.com/
Contact: Letters@LedgerEnquirer.com

Related Articles & Web Site:

Killing Pablo - Detailed Series
http://freedomtoexhale.com/kp.htm

War on Whom?
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10913.shtml

The Roots of Hatred
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10901.shtml

Terrorists Get Cash From Drug Trade
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10912.shtml

During Cold War, Islamic Radicals Were Allies
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10903.shtml

CannabisNews Articles - Bin Laden
http://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=Bin+Laden


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #3 posted by Robbie on September 16, 2001 at 11:44:26 PT
Words of wisdom
Instant Karma
John Lennon

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna knock you right on the head
You better get yourself together
Pretty soon you're gonna be dead
What in the world you thinking of
Laughing in the face of love
What on earth you tryin' to do
It's up to you, yeah you

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna look you right in the face
Better get yourself together darlin'
Join the human race
How in the world you gonna see
Laughin' at fools like me
Who in the hell d'you think you are
A super star
Well, right you are

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Ev'ryone come on

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna knock you off your feet
Better recognize your brothers
Ev'ryone you meet
Why in the world are we here
Surely not to live in pain and fear
Why on earth are you there
When you're ev'rywhere
Come and get your share

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
Come on and on and on on on
Yeah yeah, alright, uh huh, ah

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
On and on and on on and on

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Robbie on September 16, 2001 at 11:44:25 PT
Words of wisdom
Instant Karma
John Lennon

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna knock you right on the head
You better get yourself together
Pretty soon you're gonna be dead
What in the world you thinking of
Laughing in the face of love
What on earth you tryin' to do
It's up to you, yeah you

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna look you right in the face
Better get yourself together darlin'
Join the human race
How in the world you gonna see
Laughin' at fools like me
Who in the hell d'you think you are
A super star
Well, right you are

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Ev'ryone come on

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna knock you off your feet
Better recognize your brothers
Ev'ryone you meet
Why in the world are we here
Surely not to live in pain and fear
Why on earth are you there
When you're ev'rywhere
Come and get your share

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
Come on and on and on on on
Yeah yeah, alright, uh huh, ah

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
On and on and on on and on

Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Well we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun
Yeah we all shine on
Like the moon and the stars and the sun


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by xxdr_zombiexx on September 16, 2001 at 11:16:31 PT:

Related story: Assassination Squads?
I just read this on the FOX news site (link at bottom, of course)

A Republican Senator from Alabama is asking the President's committee to reverse a 25 year-old ban on Assassinating foreign person's.

**Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said there's little difference between targeting an enemy in a bombing raid and trying to kill him with a hit squad.

The war on terrorism should include a freer hand to assassinate foreign enemies and hire more unsavory covert operatives, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Saturday. **

They didn't need all this wrangling to assassinate 2 cannabis activists in Michigan 8 days before we were attacked.

Perhaps we should cexecize Forfeiture Laws against the perpetrators: take their land and their country; take their money. freeze the assetts of harboring nation, and use them to buy more weapons. Mount a giant smear campaign to slander and defame them throughout the world. Make them all line up to pee once a week and at random. Keep them from holding a legal job.

They'll do all this for touching the Weed, might as well treat people who actually do something wrong this way too.


[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:       Optional Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on September 16, 2001 at 09:08:52