U.S. Defends Anti-Narcotics Policy |
Posted by FoM on August 30, 2001 at 07:59:13 PT By Alexandra Olson, Associated Press Writer Source: Los Angeles Times Two U.S. congressmen defended their country's efforts to combat drug trafficking in the Andean region, against criticism that the United States isn't doing enough to fight drugs at home. At the Andean Parliament summit on drug trafficking Wednesday, Rep. Cass Ballenger of North Carolina and Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana answered concerns that the United States is spending too much money on fighting drug trafficking and too little on reducing demand. Snipped Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help |
Comment #7 posted by thornintheside on August 30, 2001 at 13:27:23 PT |
When the DEA became an abbreviation they forgot to use the words 'total hostility' at the end of it. Thus the acronym, 'DEATH'. It fits them perfectly. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #6 posted by jAHn on August 30, 2001 at 12:19:29 PT |
This column is excerpted from Mumia's contribution to the book "Escape Routes", which you can get free by email at http://www.emailchapters.com I'm reading the email chapters and it's loaded Che showed that when we have found a vision to What exactly was the heart of Che's vision, that To quote him further, from his last letter to his Here is Mumia's contribution: HELL ON EARTH When most folks think of Hell, they think of Whole religions have based their appeal on such But as the brilliant philosopher Schopenhauer asked, There may well be a hell that is an underworld, but It is not to the theologians, or other religious A true history of the Americas, while seemingly To the remainders of this nation's original people, And speaking of genocides and holocausts, one O God of Mercy Decades before there was a holocaust in Europe The English dramatist, Christopher Marlowes Hell hath no limits nor is circumscribed Marlowe's Mephistopheles speaks, not of an But enough about history and literature, for hell When a child in poverty dies of starvation, there When people groan under the boot of oppression, Where there is injustice, there is hell. The greatest Russian novelist Dostoyevsky described This sounds like an apt description of far too much you can read the rest of the book for free at [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #5 posted by observer on August 30, 2001 at 11:02:22 PT |
Two U.S. congressmen defended their country's efforts to combat drug trafficking in the Andean region, against criticism that the United States isn't doing enough to fight drugs at home. Chuckle. A false dilemma: the choices are not "oppress and poison the Colombian peasants," or "force more totalitarian government monitioring of or blood and urine." No, that is a classic false dilemma. A logical fallacy. A Falsehood. The sagacious congressmen and free press here forgot to mention the option that the US propaganda press always does its best to forget, or to smear: the option of returning to people their traditional freedoms is not mentioned. Drug prohibition did not come down from heaven as a gift to mankind the value of which is unquestionable. Drug prohibition was thought up by narrow-minded controllers, petty tyrants, politicians . By an amazing coincidence, prohibition is implemented by taking away traditional rights from adults, and giving government more power. Prohibitionists want you to forget all that, though. Gung-ho drug warriors want us to believe that jailing drugs users is now and has eternally been the moral and righteous thing to do. Drug warriors are sadly deluded. Always a set up, or pretext for more totalitarian controls, eh? You have to wonder how these clowns forgot to mention gettng peppered with vocal calls for legalization. Maybe the drug (wars) these politicians are mainlining have affected their judgement?
8/29 Colombia: Pressure Is On In Colombia To Legalize [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #4 posted by Lehder on August 30, 2001 at 10:57:33 PT |
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/ecstasy010830.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/ecstacy_military010602.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/fire_california_010829.html [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #3 posted by Sudaca on August 30, 2001 at 08:42:31 PT |
The US didn't have to defend it's narco policies before. Things are changing. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #2 posted by Patrick on August 30, 2001 at 08:21:56 PT |
This article should be entitled… U.S. Exposes Anti-Narcotics Policy Oh and Souder is an "expert." Souder listed several initiatives to reduce drug consumption in the United States: suspending federal student loans for those found to have abused drugs; encouraging private companies to submit their employees to drug tests; and guaranteeing college loans for students who maintain good grades and avoid drugs. So, by taking away educational opportunities for those that have fallen victim to drug addiction, by violating our constitutional rights and invading persons for their bodily fluids and guaranteeing student loans only to the goody two shoe graduates of D.A.R.E. programs, you will cut drug consumption in the US? Please vote this moron out of office. Soulder must have gone to Nazi training camp as a youth. Why doesn't he also suggest that we tattoo drug user foreheads, shave their heads and make them wear the Star of David on their clothing ala Schindler's List. In addition, "Ballenger emphasized that the United States spends $15 billion a year battling substance abuse. Wrong. This is not money spent on battling "drug abuse!" It's money spent on law enforcement in a failed effort to prohibit use. It would not cost even 1 billion dollars to truly care and treat all the addicts in this country. However, it does take 15 billion bucks to keep law enforcement stocked with a good supply of body bags and high tech snooping toys. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #1 posted by auto on August 30, 2001 at 08:17:21 PT |
You call these solutions? I call these the Feds attempt to instill even greater power over you and me while taking away the very freedoms our forefathers sought to provide for us. Each day I grow more angry at this administration and the power they choose to hold over you and I. This was once a democracy...now this has gotten way out of hand. FEDS WAY OF REDUCING DRUGS: suspending federal student loans for those found to have abused drugs; encouraging private companies to submit their employees to drug tests; and guaranteeing college loans for students who maintain good grades and avoid drugs. What a joke. [ Post Comment ] |
Post Comment | |