Cannabis News Students for Sensible Drug Policy
  The Slow-Mo World of Marijuana
Posted by FoM on August 24, 2001 at 09:04:08 PT
By Sean Twist -- For the London Free Press 
Source: London Free Press 

cannabis It's a commonly held belief all writers are on drugs. For many, there's no other explanation for being a writer.

In fact, most think a writer's life runs something like this: Sleep until noon, clear the wine bottles off the bed, crunch across a living room filled with pizza boxes, scratch yourself, then fire up a joint while you fire up the computer. How else could someone come up with all those ideas, all that inspiration? Writers must use drugs. Besides, you'd have to be stoned to think you could make a living at it.

So it's probably no surprise that I, being a writer, support the legalization of marijuana. What may surprise you is why I support it.

First, set aside all your preconceptions about writers, Allan Rock and other shady practitioners of the arts and examine the problems of marijuana in the first place.

It's natural. It just kind of grows, as much a part of creation as hummingbirds and ocelots. The fact smoking marijuana makes you suddenly like progressive rock shouldn't make it illegal. It's common knowledge Australians lick toads to get high, but we don't see the full weight of the Australian judiciary criminalizing amphibians.

What should be criminalized is progressive rock, but no, our laws target an innocent weed and not Dave Matthews.

Secondly, there are misconceptions about the effects of marijuana. The general populace, courtesy of governments and mothers worldwide, think one inhalation of a joint will cause men to become axe murderers or find Monica Lewinsky attractive. All sorts of horrible things will occur and, if enough people partake, chaos will ensue, society will fall. In truth, anyone who has attended any party since 1954 can attest the most violent disturbances are courtesy of alcohol -- pot smokers are too busy giggling over the word purple.

The biggest problem with marijuana is simply its name: marijuana. It just sounds illicit. It evokes images of dusty bordellos on the Mexican border, cheap tattoos and waking up with more than a hangover.

It's a word that has no place in suburbia, with neatly cut lawns and Little League. It belongs to another world where people don't floss or even vacuum on a regular basis.

It's scary. It's enticing. It's . . . too natural.

Imagine the world if this inconspicious plant wasn't tagged with a name that sounds like the last cut on an Eagles album.

If some myopic British botanist had called it, say, "parson's delight," we'd now probably be handing it out to children on Halloween.

"Oh, here you go Johnny, take some parson's delight. And take these potato chips, you'll be wanting them later."

But back to my original point: marijuana should be legalized. And not because of the reasons relatively daring politicians float when they talk to anyone with a ponytail: the cost of prosecution, it's a soft drug, blah blah blah, beer's worse, and with pot you don't have to take back the empties.

No, I think marijuana should be legalized because it makes people stupid.

Once upon a time, in my wild youth, when I used to never return library books on time, I tried it. I imbibed the smoke that launched a thousand reggae songs. And to my complete disillusionment, I discovered . . . I didn't like it. It slowed my mind down.

I'm used to a consciousness that flickers from idea to image with the speed of a hundred television screens with ADD. Now, I felt like my neurons were trapped in molasses.

This, I thought, must be what being a football fan is like.

And so I never touched it again. But as I look around an ever more competitive job market and with younger and brighter writers coming up behind me, I need an edge -- a stumbling block to make the sweet, young things miss deadlines or decide to study Feng Shui instead. I need the competition stupid and lazy, and marijuana's the answer.

So legalize pot. Perpetuate the myth that writing isn't about work and determination, but puffin' a doob and listening to the Doors. That way, I'll still have a job.

Sean Twist is a London freelance writer. His column appears every other Saturday.

Source: London Free Press (CN ON)
Author: Sean Twist -- For the London Free Press
Published: August 24, 2001
Copyright: 2001 The London Free Press a division of Sun Media Corporation.
Contact: letters@lfpress.com
Website: http://www.fyilondon.com/londonfreepress/

CannabisNews - Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #5 posted by PoisonedFor4YrsSoFar on August 24, 2001 at 16:05:04 PT
Its not nice picking on Monica
Its not nice picking on Monica.
Besides I suspect a lot of guys would
not need any inducement.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by Pontifex on August 24, 2001 at 12:29:20 PT:

Fun with generalizations
The good news is that, even though he lacks personal experience with cannabis, this writer understands the futility and ignorance of prohibition.

The bad news is that, like many teetotaling columnists, this author concludes from his single experience with cannabis that it "makes people stupid".

Can you remember the first time you smoked cannabis? I, for one, was totally debilitated. My friend and I inhaled an entire joint and it felt like the world had been turned inside out. We could barely walk back to his dorm, where we struggled with a pizza and crashed out listening to Miles Davis.

Generalizing from that experience, I might have concluded that cannabis was a potent hallucinogen and narcotic. But my second and third experiences were much more mellow, and today, the impairment is gone, but the intellectual enabling remains.

But sure, let Sean Twist think he's somehow got the competitive upper hand over his pot-smoking competition. We other writers know the truth. ;)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by kaptinemo on August 24, 2001 at 11:53:50 PT
This man is dangerous!!! :)
"The general populace, courtesy of governments and mothers worldwide, think one inhalation of a joint will cause men to become axe murderers or find Monica Lewinsky attractive.

It caught me off guard; I almost split a gut, laughing.

But I no more subscribe to his 'stupid' theory than I would in Phogiston chemistry. Just one more hack playing at journalism, trying to ingratiate himself with his editors.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on August 24, 2001 at 10:28:20 PT
Alcohol
If I drank any alcohol at all I couldn't do what I do here. I only drank alcohol a few years out of my whole life and I was not able to do much of anything but drink. I quit. Alcohol's sure not for me. I was really mean too!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by Doug on August 24, 2001 at 10:10:20 PT
Sounds Like Alcohol
Yeah, I know he's trying to be humorous. But the one effect I notice whenever I have a couple of glasses of wine is that, after the initial high is over, my mind feels like it is running in mollasses. And for someone who likes to use their mind, this is not a great feeling. Parson's Delight, on the other hand, not only never does this, but does the opposite, causing many more associations of ideas than I would normally have.


[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 24, 2001 at 09:04:08