Cannabis News DrugSense
  Marijuana Support at 30-Year High
Posted by FoM on August 23, 2001 at 18:26:18 PT
By Dennis Cauchon, USA Today 
Source: USA Today 

cannabis Support for legalizing marijuana is at its highest level in at least 30 years, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup poll. The poll found that 34% favored legalizing marijuana use while 62% were opposed, the most support for legalization since pollsters began asking the question in 1969.

Support for legalization had been constant at about 25% for 20 years before the USA TODAY poll recorded a rise to 31% in August 2000 and 34% earlier this month.

Snipped


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #19 posted by mayan on August 27, 2001 at 01:40:02 PT
SANITY SAYS...
ITSAGONNABLEGAL!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #17 posted by LissyMama on August 25, 2001 at 06:51:45 PT:

legal drugs
But Robert Hussey, says "We have enough legal drugs out there. We don't need another one," he says.

Wow, he is so right! We have plenty of cancer drugs, we don't need another! And why develop oral diabetes meds, after all we have injectable insulin!
What a moron.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by The Offspring on August 24, 2001 at 15:25:19 PT
Canada should legalize Marijuana
If 47% of the people think marijuana should be legalize, I wonder what the government is waitng for. 68% support decriminalization which is very good. The Canadian people want their weed to be legal.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #15 posted by blunt monkey on August 24, 2001 at 10:51:44 PT:

Message and Money
They haven't been able to get their message out?
Afew wealthy people with sensible views on drug policy contribute some money to the legalization monvement and suddenly the billions of our tax dollars the antis spend every year is not enough?
What should we do? Use our Social Security money?
Oh, wait, that's already happening.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #14 posted by Doug on August 24, 2001 at 09:53:39 PT
If you want to send a message...
use a telegram. This is a piece of advice they always gives writers who want to put a message into their stories. The antis haven't taken this advice.

Reading that collection of quotes from Observer caused me to laugh at my keyboard. When all the cliches of the Drug Warriors are put together one realizes what puny minds we are dealing with. I'm sure there is a traing school they all go to that tells them what lines to use.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by Sam Adams on August 24, 2001 at 09:05:10 PT
wow
Nice research Observer! Incredible.

Damn Lehder, I never really thought of it that way before - look at the "big 3" of drug law enforcement - We've put 3 ultra-extremists from the Deep South in charge of the Drug War. Guys that grew up during the Civil Rights period that are basically put in place by the pre-civil rights generation in order to roll it back as much as possible. I think it's so funny that for medical marijuana they always accuse us of a "hidden agenda" of legalization. In other words, that's what we really want. Well what do the "Big 3" want in their heart of hearts? A return to slavery. If they could wave a magic wand, that's what they would do. Slavery for the blacks, no divorces available for servile women, obedient and subjagated to the man of the house. These guys hate feminists even more than they hate us!


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by r.earing on August 24, 2001 at 08:52:20 PT:

canadas numbers
Canadian polls released this week (accurate to 2.5% 19X/20)

47% want immediate legalization for all purposes
68% would support decriminalization of possesion
72% approve of med pot for serious illness


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by TroutMask on August 24, 2001 at 08:31:43 PT
We Are Winning!!!
We are winning!!!!

70% in favor of medical marijuana!?!

Guess what politicians! The war is lost! In cases where your side has been dessimated, it is usually best to concede defeat and move on. Sitting in your pillboxes and continuing to shoot ensures your rapid political death.

-TM

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by Lehder on August 24, 2001 at 07:36:57 PT
Lone Star Resident
The beginning of the end for Joe McCarthy can be traced to preposterous insinuations directed at the administration of Dwight Eisenhower, of a loyalty beyond question, and even the U.S. army. The public rightly perceived his pogrom then as derived not from reason but a maniacal inflexibility.

In exactly the same way, the federal government's intractable and cruel stance on medical marijuana reveals to everyone the truth that its "drug-free" crusade is one of bigotry and national self-destruction.

McCarthy rapidly grew more strident and absurd and took to carrying a 45 revolver, presumably to protect himself from subversives. After his formal censure by the Senate in 1954 by a vote of 67-32 he took to heavy drinking and died of cirrohis in 1957.

The medical issue is hastening a similar humiliating end for the drug war and the hoary cabal of racists Ashcroft, Walters, Hutchinson and America's biggest embarrassment in a long time, our vacationing Resident George W. He would be smart to stay in Texas for good, picking peyote and living it up. He won't be missed.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by Dan B on August 24, 2001 at 06:01:07 PT:

A bit from me
Notice that the question was whether or not those surveryed would want to legalize marijuana. That 34% answered "yes" to this question outright shows that we really are winning.

Consider that the numbers would be very different if the question was, "Do you think that people should be imprisoned for smoking marijuana?" or better yet, "Do you believe that all marijuana smokers deserve prison sentences?" If these questions were asked, we would see a very different outcome, indeed.

I believe that most Americans are genuinely in favor of at least decriminalizing certain drugs, but their voices are not heard because the pollsters are asking the wrong questions. Granted, decriminalization does not go far enough, but it is a step in the right direction.

The bare facts are these: we tried legalization once . . . for thousands of years before the 1914 Harrison Act. At that time, it worked to allow people to make their own decisions about the substances they should or should not put into their bodies. Most "drug addiction" at the turn of the century was caused by lack of information about correct usage, not from an abundant availability of these drugs. Still, there were fewer drug addicts per capita then than there are now, after over 80 years of ever-increasing opporession.

If legalization could work better even without our modern understanding of proper use, think how much better it could work if we implemented legalization now, combined with an information campaign telling the truth about proper dosages and safety precautions, and with the added benefit of a regulated market where we would not have the wide fluctuations in quality that have led to so many overdose deaths under prohibition and the black market.

Fortunately, we have increasingly achieved a voice with which to air such ideas, which is why the tide is turning. And quickly. We've gained 3 percentage points in just one year, after a slow creep up of six points over a longer period of time.

But these statistics, in the scheme of things, really don't matter much. As was already duly noted, over 70% of Americans believe that marijuana should be legal for medical purposes, yet the politicians--who (as was also duly noted) work not for the people, but for the corporations--refuse to budge on even that issue, which is firmly settled in the minds of the vast majority of Americans, even at the height of the government's anti-medical-marijuana propaganda.

In the end, perhaps our votes are the loudest voices we have.

Dan B

P.S. Great collection of quotations, observer.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by pissedonandoff on August 24, 2001 at 01:49:49 PT:

ever hear of mandate
I was suprised to read that over 70% of voters are for legalized medical marijuana. Can you believe that 70% are for something and we cannot have it? I do not know how many Presidents have used the term after an election- "We have a mandate." I know Nixon and Reagan did. The issue of medical marijuana seems to not only be mandated, it has been voted for in eight states. And we don't have legalized marijuana? The system needs to be fixed. Oh, it already is.

You know how the right wing conservatives apply their litmus test on the prolife issue? I can assure our elected officials that I will be applying a litmus test to them in every election until marijuana is legalized. I see it as a freedom issue because itis a freedom issue. I want my freedoms restored to me and I want to see some pragmatism instead of dogmatism.

Somebody explain to Dubya what 70% means.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 22:04:49 PT
Messages in Human Flesh
But Robert Hussey, executive director of the California Narcotics Officers Association . . . "We haven't been able to get our message out."

"Sending a message" is their favorite excuse to destroy pot smokers and others ...

[...]e defended Dugger, and Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Wade Beach prosecuted the case. "We want to send a message to drug dealers that we are not going to tolerate it in Lonoke County," McCastlain said. ( US AR: Meth Charge Leads To 60-Year Sentence, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Thu, 01 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n367/a06.html )

[...]ent will not tolerate people who make a living out of the drug trade. "These proposed measures send a very strong message to the Mr Bigs in drug trafficking that their life times liberty is seriously at risk if they [...] ( Australia: Web: Victorian Govt Propose Life, , Thu, 01 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n369/a10.html )

[...]ying, that it's normal for us all to be drunk," James, a 16-year-old junior, said. "We hope to send a message to people that most teens don't use drugs," 17-year-old junior Ashley said. The students said [...] ( US OH: 'We Don't Use Drugs,' Teens Shout On, Chris Seper, Plain Dealer Reporter, Thu, 01 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n366/a10.html )

[...]s harmful, even addictive. They worry that legalizing marijuana, even for medical purposes, is sending a mixed message to teen-agers. They call on parents once again to rise up in defense of their children, just l[...] ( US TX: Joint Effort, Mark Donald, Wed, 21 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n495/a07.html )

[...] is clearly identified with the counterculture" ( not exactly untrue ) and that legalizing it "sends the wrong message" about marijuana. The FRC also opposes medical marijuana. ( US: What's Your Anti-Drug, Steven Wishnia, Mon, 16 Apr 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n517/a02.html )

[...]his resolution," Hammett said. "Their success has been greater than we ever imagined. They are sending a message to people using and dealing illegal drugs that Covington County is not a place for them to be.[...] ( US AL: State Commends Drug Task Force, Michael Willard, Sat, 24 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n517/a07.html )

[...]ated he supports the bill. Many supporters outside the Statehouse think tougher standards will send the right message to methamphetamine users and manufacturers. "When they start seeing people going down, they'll[...] ( US IN: Lawmakers Take On The Meth Labs, Jennifer Wagner, Sun, 25 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n523/a06.html )

[...]e a hard line on drugs is appropriate, or do not wish to be seen as soft on crime. "I think it sends out a very negative message to the public at large," said Connecticut state Rep. Ronald San Angelo, a Republican who oppos[...] ( US CT: Census: War On Drugs Hit Blacks, Diane Scarponi, The Associated Press, Sat, 7 Jul 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1212/a05.html )

[...] the UI to develop a strain of hemp with zero THC, but Ryan said signing the bill would still "send a mixed message to the youth of our state." Antidrug advocates were overjoyed by the news. "We are thrilled," exclaimed Judy Kreamer of Educating Voices, a group that had lobbied hard against the bill. "Industrial hemp poses law enforcement problems, and it sends the wrong message to kids, and it really holds out a false hope to farmers." . . . ( US IL: Ryan Vetoes Ui Bill To Study Industrial Hemp, Kate Clements, Sat, 04 Aug 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1432/a07.html )

[...]ny drug- dealing conviction. Prosecutor George Leal said he was pleased with the sentence. "It sends a message if you're dealing or distributing drugs, citizens of the county are tired of that, and they wi[...] ( US TX: Jury Sentences Slaton Woman To Life In Prison, Jesus Arenas, Sat, 11 Aug 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1476/a05.html )

[...]nst drug abuse. "The reality is if you get the message out early to young people ... they will send that message to their friends, to people they don't even know, and we will be able to see a change in patte[...] ( US IN: Governor Names Anti-Drug Czar, , Thu, 08 Feb 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n270/a09.html )

[...] as a mislabeled drug. His prosecution in U.S. District Court in Roanoke, Va., was intended to send a message to other sellers that abuse of the gas is both dangerous and a crime. The gas, commonly used w[...] ( US AZ: Laughing Gas Death Leads to Prison, Jon Kamman, Tue, 06 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n406/a04.html )



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 22:02:36 PT
Messages in Human Flesh ...

[...]pers or seen on the news. What was the one thing that they had in common? Drugs and drug users. ( US NM: LTE: Don't Send Wrong Message To Kids About, Rick M. Anglada Vice President N.M. State Police Association, Sat, 10 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n425/a02.html )

[...]tate seeking alternatives that actually persuade drug users to quit, it cannot afford to begin sending a message that drug abuse is anything less than a crime that menaces society. Illegal drugs cause harm. Even the drug users who are not themselves violent are implicitly connected with the violence and harm that accompanies the drug from its manufacture to the moment it reaches their hands. This harm ranges from the poverty that spreads through Third World countries, where cartels force farmland to be used for drug-related crops rather than food, to the violent gang culture that invades many U.S. cities. In addition, the drugs cause irreparable harm to their users, and these often are young people enticed with lies. To decriminalize such a scourge would be an outrage. The same could be said for anything that sends a message to potential users that the crime carries no real punishment. ( US UT: Editorial: Ridding Society Of Drug Abuse, , Mon, 09 Apr 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n629/a04.html )

[...]n local anti-crime effort, strengthen neighborhood spirit and police-community partnership and send a message to criminals that neighbors are fighting back. . . . ( US NC: Law Enforcement Officials Preparing For National Night, Jillian McCartney, Sat, 4 Aug 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1431/a12.html )

[...]ecutor Capt. Michael Friemann asked the judge to sentence Pouncey to five years in prison, to "send a message" to the cadets and the regular Air Force. "It needs to be strong enough so they'll think twice[...] ( US CO: Cadet Sentenced For Drug Use, Dick Foster, Wed, 31 Jan 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n184/a10.html )

[...]message for our children is quite simple: If we allow our President and national leadership to send a permissive drug message, drug use goes up drastically. ( US AK: OPED: Drugs Attack Society's Moral Fiber, Wevley Shea, Wed, 16 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n878/a07.html )

The decision sends the message that the nation's highest court is not going to be misled by junk-science. There is no credibl[...] ( US GA: Editorial: Pot Deservedly KO'd, , Thu, 17 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n885/a07.html )

Even worse, it would send a strong message to our young people that they can find refuge from their problems and reality through artifici[...] ( US NY: Editorial: Casualties Of The Drug War, , Sat, 17 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n468/a07.html )

[...]juana, and she can see through the disinformation campaign used to support that position. That sends her the wrong message. ( US CA: PUB LTE: Unjust Drug Laws Send Wrong Message To Kids, Malcolm Menged, Thu, 17 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n879/a06.html )

[...]rmacy student, should have known the dangers of OxyContin. She wanted the youths prosecuted to send a message to drug dealers. The young men are not the first to be prosecuted. Last year, a Florida doctor[...] ( US FL: FL Takes Drugs Prosecutions FurtherManslaughter If User, Vickie Chachere (Associated Press), Mon, 04 Jun 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1038/a09.html )




[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 21:58:28 PT
Messages in Human Flesh, 2

[...]abuse issues." Parmenter said the group will try to persuade Ryan that signing the bill "would send the wrong message to children" about drugs. The group also will seek to block funding for the study. ( US IL: Illinois Bill To Set Up Study Of Hemp, Kevin McDermott, Post-Dispatch Springfield Bureau, Wed, 10 Jan 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n054/a05.html )

[...]ously misguided notion about drug use. Needle-exchange programs "are simply wrong because they send a mixed message to our youth about the dangers of drugs," said Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Horn. "Neith[...] ( US CA: Needle-Exchange Plan Hits Wall In San Diego, Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times, Wed, 31 Jan 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n184/a05.html )

[...]ry forces and police officers ever turned their backs on this country and gave up on any fight. ( US NM: LTE: Don't Send Wrong Message To Kids About, Rick M. Anglada Vice President N.M. State Police Association, Sat, 10 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n425/a02.html )

[...] Prichard, Minnesota Family Council president, told the subcommittee legal marijuana use would send the wrong message to children and that it is associated with several health risks, including cancer. Prichard al[...] ( US MN: New Minn. Bill To Allocate $100,000 For Medicinal, Scott Vander Heiden, Thu, 05 Apr 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n610/a06.html )

[...] Nebraska on Hemp's Side" ), State Sen. Ed Schrock stated that Legislative Bill 273 "is mainly sending a message to the DEA ( Drug Enforcement Administration )." Actually, this bill to legalize the growing of marijuana hemp in Nebraska is sending an even louder message to our children. LB 273 is telling Nebraska's young people that marijuana is OK. The marijuana[...] ( US NE: LTE: Hemp Bill Is Wrong, Susie Dugan, Omaha Executive Director,, Wed, 18 Apr 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n680/a07.html )

[...]on or one ounce or less of marijuana from a felony to a misdemeanor. "I'm concerned that we're sending the wrong message," she said. "We're telling them it's OK to have a little bit because it's not a big deal." ( US NV: Nevada Lawmakers Hear Case for Medical, , Mon, 07 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n812/a11.html )

[...]ittee on Moral Concerns, said the reclassification "leads young people down the wrong road" by sending a relaxed message about marijuana. ( US CA: Bill Lessens Penalty for Smoking Marijuana, Kevin Yamamura, Scripps-McClatchy Western Service, Tue, 08 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n819/a07.html )

[...]gn trail in Atlanta, the pledge was crystal clear. "If I'm entrusted with the Presidency, I'll send a strong message to every American child: Drugs are wrong, drugs can kill you. I'll lead a national crusade to [...] ( US: Editorial: Still Walters, , Mon, 14 May 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n856/a04.html )

[...]a's focus is consistently on the point of view of the opposition. For teens and pre-teens this sends the message that marijuana use may be OK and that the government is being unreasonable. For nearly 20 year[...] ( US FL: LTE: Mixed Messages Encourage Drug Abuse, Peggy B. Sapp, Fri, 06 Jul 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1211/a01.html )

[...]e conference: "Miami reminds those who claim to reduce harm while promoting drug use that they send complex, confusing, and erroneous message [sic]." Beneath an ominous "Welcome to Miami, we'll be watching out for you" was an anti-rave [...] ( US FL: Raver Madness, Brett Sokol, Sat, 9 Nov 2000, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1692/a10.html )

[...]tion or liberalizing drug laws would increase both drug acceptance and accessibility. It would send the wrong message to young people. Alcohol and tobacco both provide examples of substances that are legal and re[...] ( CN BC: LTE: Legalizing Drugs Isn't The Answer, Dr. Colin Mangham, Thu, 01 Feb 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n224/a07.html )

[...]y, Martinez said he opposes Johnson's proposals because: - - Marijuana decriminalization would send a negative message to children and the rest of the nation regarding the use of drugs; - Decriminalization would[...] ( US NM: Drug Bills Opposed By DAs, Jeremy Pawloskim, Journal Staff Writer, Thu, 15 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n462/a04.html )

[...] for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said that suggesting legalizing drugs "sends the wrong message to our children." "While some of the gang violence may be mitigated, the bad consequences of d[...] ( Mexico: Wire: Fox Talks Drug Legalization, John Rice, Associated Press Writer, Mon, 19 Mar 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n484/a03.html )

[...]ing this is a bad experience I had when I was 15, and I'm not going to do it again, or if they send a bad message that it didn't bother me, in fact, you know, I thought it was cool to do, as Bill Clinton did in college, I think that that adds credibility to the argument that we ought to change drug policy, and that's a bad message for our kids. ( US: Transcript: CNN CrossFire: Should Marijuana Be, , Fri, 20 Apr 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n716/a07.html )

[...] 52,000 lives in drug-related deaths and $160.7-billion in societal costs. We must continue to send clear and consistent messages about the dangers of drug use and empower parents to keep their children drug-free. The Ameri[...] ( US FL: LTE: Keep the Message Clear, Consistent, Edward H Jurith, Mon, 13 Aug 2001, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1494/a09.html )



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 20:48:58 PT
re: Laugher
"We haven't been able to get our message out."

That one got me too ... it isn't like every time they spend more money to take away more traditional freedoms, to throw more adults in jail as pushers under 'conspiracy' laws for simply using a plant ... it isn't like they are mumbling something about "the message" they are sending out by doing so. Oh no.

No freedom is too basic, no right is too precious for prohibitionists not to steal it to send out "a message." Then they turn around and say with a perfectly straight face, "We haven't been able to get our message out."


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Sam Adams on August 23, 2001 at 20:28:59 PT
go USA today!
USA today is definitely with us on this battle - they make it sound really earth-shaking, but we're still outnumbered 2 to 1. I'd like to see a poll of all the states that did NOT vote for Bush - I'll bet it's a lot closer to 50-50. Like maybe in the Northeast and West Coast states.

"Opposition was greatest among the elderly, those who attend church weekly, and Republicans." hahahaha - that's pretty funny. Interesting about the church-goers, though. A pretty sad statement on organized religion - they're the most intolerant ones. It's too bad - I though Jesus was admired for making a stand on compassion and tolerance (e.g., the poor, sick, prostitutes). I guess the guy's message got hijacked somewhere along the way by the hypocrites........

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by ekim on August 23, 2001 at 19:19:04 PT:

Pietri’s book is well-timed

Posted by Richard Cowan on 2001-08-22 16:08:57
Source: www.marijuananews.com

Posted August 22, 2001
Special to MarijuanaNews.com
(MarijuanaNews note: Recently most of the Nepalese royal family was massacred, allegedly by the Crown Prince, who then supposedly fatally wounded himself, dying shortly thereafter.

The Prince was reported to have been under the influence of cocaine, and unhappy with his family’s opposition to his choice of brides. Whatever the truth of that bizarre story may be, I am grateful to Mr. Pietri for giving us this insight into the mess in that unhappy little kingdom.

Pietri’s book is well-timed. I have a pre-publication copy and it is fascinating. Unfortunately, the sad tale that it tells fits a well-established pattern of DEAland narco-imperialism.)



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on August 23, 2001 at 18:45:39 PT:

Laugher
"We haven't been able to get our message out."

Channel 1, media payola, and the ONDCP budget weren't enough, huh? Well, perhaps the message is erroneous and deserving of rejection by a populace that does not agree that the loss of our basic freedoms are worth any cost.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 23, 2001 at 18:26:18