Marijuana Support at 30-Year High |
Posted by FoM on August 23, 2001 at 18:26:18 PT By Dennis Cauchon, USA Today Source: USA Today Support for legalizing marijuana is at its highest level in at least 30 years, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup poll. The poll found that 34% favored legalizing marijuana use while 62% were opposed, the most support for legalization since pollsters began asking the question in 1969. Support for legalization had been constant at about 25% for 20 years before the USA TODAY poll recorded a rise to 31% in August 2000 and 34% earlier this month. Snipped Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help |
Comment #19 posted by mayan on August 27, 2001 at 01:40:02 PT |
ITSAGONNABLEGAL! [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #17 posted by LissyMama on August 25, 2001 at 06:51:45 PT:
|
But Robert Hussey, says "We have enough legal drugs out there. We don't need another one," he says. Wow, he is so right! We have plenty of cancer drugs, we don't need another! And why develop oral diabetes meds, after all we have injectable insulin! [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #16 posted by The Offspring on August 24, 2001 at 15:25:19 PT |
If 47% of the people think marijuana should be legalize, I wonder what the government is waitng for. 68% support decriminalization which is very good. The Canadian people want their weed to be legal. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #15 posted by blunt monkey on August 24, 2001 at 10:51:44 PT:
|
They haven't been able to get their message out? Afew wealthy people with sensible views on drug policy contribute some money to the legalization monvement and suddenly the billions of our tax dollars the antis spend every year is not enough? What should we do? Use our Social Security money? Oh, wait, that's already happening. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #14 posted by Doug on August 24, 2001 at 09:53:39 PT |
use a telegram. This is a piece of advice they always gives writers who want to put a message into their stories. The antis haven't taken this advice. Reading that collection of quotes from Observer caused me to laugh at my keyboard. When all the cliches of the Drug Warriors are put together one realizes what puny minds we are dealing with. I'm sure there is a traing school they all go to that tells them what lines to use. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #13 posted by Sam Adams on August 24, 2001 at 09:05:10 PT |
Nice research Observer! Incredible. Damn Lehder, I never really thought of it that way before - look at the "big 3" of drug law enforcement - We've put 3 ultra-extremists from the Deep South in charge of the Drug War. Guys that grew up during the Civil Rights period that are basically put in place by the pre-civil rights generation in order to roll it back as much as possible. I think it's so funny that for medical marijuana they always accuse us of a "hidden agenda" of legalization. In other words, that's what we really want. Well what do the "Big 3" want in their heart of hearts? A return to slavery. If they could wave a magic wand, that's what they would do. Slavery for the blacks, no divorces available for servile women, obedient and subjagated to the man of the house. These guys hate feminists even more than they hate us! [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #12 posted by r.earing on August 24, 2001 at 08:52:20 PT:
|
Canadian polls released this week (accurate to 2.5% 19X/20) 47% want immediate legalization for all purposes [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #11 posted by TroutMask on August 24, 2001 at 08:31:43 PT |
We are winning!!!! 70% in favor of medical marijuana!?! Guess what politicians! The war is lost! In cases where your side has been dessimated, it is usually best to concede defeat and move on. Sitting in your pillboxes and continuing to shoot ensures your rapid political death. -TM [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #10 posted by Lehder on August 24, 2001 at 07:36:57 PT |
The beginning of the end for Joe McCarthy can be traced to preposterous insinuations directed at the administration of Dwight Eisenhower, of a loyalty beyond question, and even the U.S. army. The public rightly perceived his pogrom then as derived not from reason but a maniacal inflexibility. In exactly the same way, the federal government's intractable and cruel stance on medical marijuana reveals to everyone the truth that its "drug-free" crusade is one of bigotry and national self-destruction. McCarthy rapidly grew more strident and absurd and took to carrying a 45 revolver, presumably to protect himself from subversives. After his formal censure by the Senate in 1954 by a vote of 67-32 he took to heavy drinking and died of cirrohis in 1957. The medical issue is hastening a similar humiliating end for the drug war and the hoary cabal of racists Ashcroft, Walters, Hutchinson and America's biggest embarrassment in a long time, our vacationing Resident George W. He would be smart to stay in Texas for good, picking peyote and living it up. He won't be missed. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #9 posted by Dan B on August 24, 2001 at 06:01:07 PT:
|
Notice that the question was whether or not those surveryed would want to legalize marijuana. That 34% answered "yes" to this question outright shows that we really are winning. Consider that the numbers would be very different if the question was, "Do you think that people should be imprisoned for smoking marijuana?" or better yet, "Do you believe that all marijuana smokers deserve prison sentences?" If these questions were asked, we would see a very different outcome, indeed. I believe that most Americans are genuinely in favor of at least decriminalizing certain drugs, but their voices are not heard because the pollsters are asking the wrong questions. Granted, decriminalization does not go far enough, but it is a step in the right direction. The bare facts are these: we tried legalization once . . . for thousands of years before the 1914 Harrison Act. At that time, it worked to allow people to make their own decisions about the substances they should or should not put into their bodies. Most "drug addiction" at the turn of the century was caused by lack of information about correct usage, not from an abundant availability of these drugs. Still, there were fewer drug addicts per capita then than there are now, after over 80 years of ever-increasing opporession. If legalization could work better even without our modern understanding of proper use, think how much better it could work if we implemented legalization now, combined with an information campaign telling the truth about proper dosages and safety precautions, and with the added benefit of a regulated market where we would not have the wide fluctuations in quality that have led to so many overdose deaths under prohibition and the black market. Fortunately, we have increasingly achieved a voice with which to air such ideas, which is why the tide is turning. And quickly. We've gained 3 percentage points in just one year, after a slow creep up of six points over a longer period of time. But these statistics, in the scheme of things, really don't matter much. As was already duly noted, over 70% of Americans believe that marijuana should be legal for medical purposes, yet the politicians--who (as was also duly noted) work not for the people, but for the corporations--refuse to budge on even that issue, which is firmly settled in the minds of the vast majority of Americans, even at the height of the government's anti-medical-marijuana propaganda. In the end, perhaps our votes are the loudest voices we have. Dan B P.S. Great collection of quotations, observer. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #8 posted by pissedonandoff on August 24, 2001 at 01:49:49 PT:
|
I was suprised to read that over 70% of voters are for legalized medical marijuana. Can you believe that 70% are for something and we cannot have it? I do not know how many Presidents have used the term after an election- "We have a mandate." I know Nixon and Reagan did. The issue of medical marijuana seems to not only be mandated, it has been voted for in eight states. And we don't have legalized marijuana? The system needs to be fixed. Oh, it already is. You know how the right wing conservatives apply their litmus test on the prolife issue? I can assure our elected officials that I will be applying a litmus test to them in every election until marijuana is legalized. I see it as a freedom issue because itis a freedom issue. I want my freedoms restored to me and I want to see some pragmatism instead of dogmatism. Somebody explain to Dubya what 70% means. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #7 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 22:04:49 PT |
But Robert Hussey, executive director of the California Narcotics Officers Association . . . "We haven't been able to get our message out." "Sending a message" is their favorite excuse to destroy pot smokers and others ...
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #6 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 22:02:36 PT |
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #5 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 21:58:28 PT |
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #4 posted by observer on August 23, 2001 at 20:48:58 PT |
"We haven't been able to get our message out." That one got me too ... it isn't like every time they spend more money to take away more traditional freedoms, to throw more adults in jail as pushers under 'conspiracy' laws for simply using a plant ... it isn't like they are mumbling something about "the message" they are sending out by doing so. Oh no. No freedom is too basic, no right is too precious for prohibitionists not to steal it to send out "a message." Then they turn around and say with a perfectly straight face, "We haven't been able to get our message out." [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #3 posted by Sam Adams on August 23, 2001 at 20:28:59 PT |
USA today is definitely with us on this battle - they make it sound really earth-shaking, but we're still outnumbered 2 to 1. I'd like to see a poll of all the states that did NOT vote for Bush - I'll bet it's a lot closer to 50-50. Like maybe in the Northeast and West Coast states. "Opposition was greatest among the elderly, those who attend church weekly, and Republicans." hahahaha - that's pretty funny. Interesting about the church-goers, though. A pretty sad statement on organized religion - they're the most intolerant ones. It's too bad - I though Jesus was admired for making a stand on compassion and tolerance (e.g., the poor, sick, prostitutes). I guess the guy's message got hijacked somewhere along the way by the hypocrites........ [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #2 posted by ekim on August 23, 2001 at 19:19:04 PT:
|
Posted by Richard Cowan on 2001-08-22 16:08:57 Source: www.marijuananews.com Posted August 22, 2001 Special to MarijuanaNews.com (MarijuanaNews note: Recently most of the Nepalese royal family was massacred, allegedly by the Crown Prince, who then supposedly fatally wounded himself, dying shortly thereafter. The Prince was reported to have been under the influence of cocaine, and unhappy with his family’s opposition to his choice of brides. Whatever the truth of that bizarre story may be, I am grateful to Mr. Pietri for giving us this insight into the mess in that unhappy little kingdom. Pietri’s book is well-timed. I have a pre-publication copy and it is fascinating. Unfortunately, the sad tale that it tells fits a well-established pattern of DEAland narco-imperialism.) [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #1 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on August 23, 2001 at 18:45:39 PT:
|
"We haven't been able to get our message out." Channel 1, media payola, and the ONDCP budget weren't enough, huh? Well, perhaps the message is erroneous and deserving of rejection by a populace that does not agree that the loss of our basic freedoms are worth any cost. [ Post Comment ] |
Post Comment | |