Cannabis News DrugSense
  DEA Chief Looks at Calif. Policy as Blueprint
Posted by FoM on August 21, 2001 at 08:16:22 PT
By Eric Lichtblau, Times Staff Writer 
Source: Los Angeles Times 

justice The newly installed head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration said Monday that California's landmark approach to rehabilitating drug offenders can serve as a model for the rest of the country--if shortcomings in the program are fixed.

"We need to watch the California experiment. I think it's a strong statement by the population there that residents want to take a look at treatment for nonviolent drug users rather than incarceration," DEA administrator Asa Hutchinson told reporters on his first official day leading the 9,200-employee federal agency.

Snipped


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #8 posted by lookinside on August 21, 2001 at 18:23:57 PT:

this jerk...
will try to pull something...mass arrests at the cannabis
clubs is my guess...

i don't think that passive resistance will work...a few
thousand ANGRY citizens REFUSING to be arrested or allow
others to be arrested is the best method...are the feds
going to shoot unarmed citizens?...maybe once...but after
ALL the federal buildings in california mysteriously burn
down, they'd have no place to hide...

if you want to get the government's attention, a full on
RIOT will do it...i was in watts, CA in the late
60s..fortunately i wasn't there during the violence...when
you drive down a street at 2AM and see literally THOUSANDS
of people standing around WAITING for something to happen,
it is very frightening(no police presence ANYWHERE)...we
could see something like this just before the end of the war
on drugs...(or the end of the united states, if they refuse
to bow to the inevitable...)


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by rabblerouser on August 21, 2001 at 17:04:28 PT
california experiment
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Blah, blah, blah.

Asa Hutchison's grandfather would have been in the hoosegow seventy some years ago had he been caught imbibing in the then forbidden alcohol. What a sick joke this drug war must be even for the most stoic of rock ribbed, dyed in the wool present day Republicans. Abraham Lincoln is spinning in his grave as fast a harddrive. So good, another time to dwell on such a matter.

Hemp fields in Canada are a sight not soon to be forgotten. Hemp has found its place in the sun there, that is for sure. It may have given up some ground in Pine Ridge, South Dakota but it is holding its own north of the border.
You can see that it knows it is reaching for the sky.

As Dr. Timothy Leary suggested, marijuana has become aware of its own existence and no 21st Century world power is going to be able to stop it. Hemp prevails, hemp wins hands down, slam dunk, GAME OVER.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by Imprint on August 21, 2001 at 12:46:37 PT
grow big time!
Asa Hutchinson wants to keep the big budget, high profile job. And ALL police departments want to hunt you down like a rabid dog while manhandling you (if not killing you) with their SWAT tactics. They welcome Prop. 36 because they don’t have to change anything important to them. They don’t care if you are jailed or forced into some harebrained treatment program; as long as they get to play GI Joe they are happy. Whither or not you realize it each and every town and city in America has a military unit called “SWAT” ready to hunt and hurt citizens. I’m sure Hutchinson sees Prop. 36 as a middle ground where he can still build his empire. Notice how he wants us to spend even more money to fund the treatment side, yet never mentions that the enforcement side of this issue could give up some of it’s budget to support the treatment side? He wants the drug war to grow; grow big time!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on August 21, 2001 at 11:04:18 PT:

No, Not a Good Idea
"I think we need to work with California to make it work"

California would be wise to eschew federal help. It has done so much harm. Let them make the system work themselves and serve as a beacon unto the states.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Pontifex on August 21, 2001 at 10:28:11 PT:

Buying friends
Kaptinemo, you're absolutely right. Asa is headed down a treacherous road. History will not be kind to him, and if there is any justice, he will somehow be devoured by his own evil masters.

Very important point in this article:


Hutchinson is "right on the money" concerning the lack of money for treatment facilities and for drug testing, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael A. Tynan, who serves on a county commission that has studied Proposition 36, said in an interview.

While a proposed $15-million measure in Sacramento for drug testing would help fill one gap in the program, Tynan said, "I think there's a possibility the system could just get overwhelmed."

Massive amounts of money are changing hands, and Asa wants to get a hand in the action.

It's time to watch the corrupting effect of free government money, as the nascent California "treatment" establishment becomes an enthusiastic supporter of the War on Drugs.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by dddd on August 21, 2001 at 09:07:35 PT
strange place
...yup,,,SoCal is a unique place....We got Hollywood,and
the Surf Cities,,bunches of forward thinking,freedom loving
people,,,and at the same time,we have an upper crusty
mega conservative,faction,,,they're the ones with the big
money,,hence they are disproportionatly represented...it's
a strange place to live......indeedddd


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by kaptinemo on August 21, 2001 at 08:54:10 PT:

Yes, let's talk about agendas, shall we?
"Although California and seven other states allow ill residents to use marijuana for medical purposes, Hutchinson said there is little scientific evidence to suggest any real benefits from the practice. "You have to listen to the medical community in terms of what is legitimate pain medication and [what] has legitimate health benefits, versus that which is simply a guise for a different agenda in reference to marijuana," Hutchinson said.

Agendas. He's oh-so-concerned about agendas. Namely, the possibility that there might be hidden ones. But as the old saying goes, a thief will suspect you of theft, and a liar of lying. A man who makes such noises about other people having agendas is no doubt hoping that no one will entertain the idea that he's playing the same game.

Careful, Asa-me-lad, careful. Your agency's agenda can't stand much public scrutiny.

When the DEA's own Law Judge Francis Young declared that cannabis should be decriminalized, what was DEA's agenda? To sweep his recommendations under the rug.

When the electorate of California and Arizona, through a clear and unequivocal exercise of their sovereign franchise as citizens of this democracy, voted for MMJ, what was DEA's agenda? To work with the (ha, ha) 'Justice' Department to draw up a scheme whereby doctors would have their DEA drug licenses stripped from them should they recommend MMJ.

When Dr. Donald Abrams sought to obtain U of Miss ditchweed for his groundbreaking study in MMJ, the DEA sat on his request for years, doing everything in their power to obstruct the approval process. So much for assisting doctors in the objective pursuit of 'legitimate research'. If that doesn't come under the heading of 'hidden agendas', I don't know what does.

(Fortunately, courtesy of some brave doctors slapping Officer Boot on his porcine snout with a rolled up but no less heavy First Amendment lawsuit, they backed off. This time.)

Agendas. Asa may find out that 'his' own agency may have a hidden agenda in mind for him as well.


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on August 21, 2001 at 08:34:22 PT
The Prohibition Daily, I mean LA Times......
Ouch! The LA Times is tough! At one point they actually called Hutchinson "progressive" - I bet that's a first!

How did SoCal get to be so damn regressive -"conservative" - in the first place? Hollywood is such a better fit for San Fran than LA, what were THEY thinking?

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 21, 2001 at 08:16:22