DEA Chief Looks at Calif. Policy as Blueprint |
Posted by FoM on August 21, 2001 at 08:16:22 PT By Eric Lichtblau, Times Staff Writer Source: Los Angeles Times The newly installed head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration said Monday that California's landmark approach to rehabilitating drug offenders can serve as a model for the rest of the country--if shortcomings in the program are fixed. "We need to watch the California experiment. I think it's a strong statement by the population there that residents want to take a look at treatment for nonviolent drug users rather than incarceration," DEA administrator Asa Hutchinson told reporters on his first official day leading the 9,200-employee federal agency. Snipped Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help |
Comment #8 posted by lookinside on August 21, 2001 at 18:23:57 PT:
|
will try to pull something...mass arrests at the cannabis clubs is my guess... i don't think that passive resistance will work...a few if you want to get the government's attention, a full on [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #7 posted by rabblerouser on August 21, 2001 at 17:04:28 PT |
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Blah, blah, blah. Asa Hutchison's grandfather would have been in the hoosegow seventy some years ago had he been caught imbibing in the then forbidden alcohol. What a sick joke this drug war must be even for the most stoic of rock ribbed, dyed in the wool present day Republicans. Abraham Lincoln is spinning in his grave as fast a harddrive. So good, another time to dwell on such a matter. Hemp fields in Canada are a sight not soon to be forgotten. Hemp has found its place in the sun there, that is for sure. It may have given up some ground in Pine Ridge, South Dakota but it is holding its own north of the border. As Dr. Timothy Leary suggested, marijuana has become aware of its own existence and no 21st Century world power is going to be able to stop it. Hemp prevails, hemp wins hands down, slam dunk, GAME OVER.
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #6 posted by Imprint on August 21, 2001 at 12:46:37 PT |
Asa Hutchinson wants to keep the big budget, high profile job. And ALL police departments want to hunt you down like a rabid dog while manhandling you (if not killing you) with their SWAT tactics. They welcome Prop. 36 because they don’t have to change anything important to them. They don’t care if you are jailed or forced into some harebrained treatment program; as long as they get to play GI Joe they are happy. Whither or not you realize it each and every town and city in America has a military unit called “SWAT” ready to hunt and hurt citizens. I’m sure Hutchinson sees Prop. 36 as a middle ground where he can still build his empire. Notice how he wants us to spend even more money to fund the treatment side, yet never mentions that the enforcement side of this issue could give up some of it’s budget to support the treatment side? He wants the drug war to grow; grow big time! [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #5 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on August 21, 2001 at 11:04:18 PT:
|
"I think we need to work with California to make it work" California would be wise to eschew federal help. It has done so much harm. Let them make the system work themselves and serve as a beacon unto the states. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #4 posted by Pontifex on August 21, 2001 at 10:28:11 PT:
|
Kaptinemo, you're absolutely right. Asa is headed down a treacherous road. History will not be kind to him, and if there is any justice, he will somehow be devoured by his own evil masters. Very important point in this article:
While a proposed $15-million measure in Sacramento for drug testing would help fill one gap in the program, Tynan said, "I think there's a possibility the system could just get overwhelmed." Massive amounts of money are changing hands, and Asa wants to get a hand in the action. It's time to watch the corrupting effect of free government money, as the nascent California "treatment" establishment becomes an enthusiastic supporter of the War on Drugs. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #3 posted by dddd on August 21, 2001 at 09:07:35 PT |
...yup,,,SoCal is a unique place....We got Hollywood,and the Surf Cities,,bunches of forward thinking,freedom loving people,,,and at the same time,we have an upper crusty mega conservative,faction,,,they're the ones with the big money,,hence they are disproportionatly represented...it's a strange place to live......indeedddd [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #2 posted by kaptinemo on August 21, 2001 at 08:54:10 PT:
|
"Although California and seven other states allow ill residents to use marijuana for medical purposes, Hutchinson said there is little scientific evidence to suggest any real benefits from the practice. "You have to listen to the medical community in terms of what is legitimate pain medication and [what] has legitimate health benefits, versus that which is simply a guise for a different agenda in reference to marijuana," Hutchinson said. Agendas. He's oh-so-concerned about agendas. Namely, the possibility that there might be hidden ones. But as the old saying goes, a thief will suspect you of theft, and a liar of lying. A man who makes such noises about other people having agendas is no doubt hoping that no one will entertain the idea that he's playing the same game. Careful, Asa-me-lad, careful. Your agency's agenda can't stand much public scrutiny. When the DEA's own Law Judge Francis Young declared that cannabis should be decriminalized, what was DEA's agenda? To sweep his recommendations under the rug. When the electorate of California and Arizona, through a clear and unequivocal exercise of their sovereign franchise as citizens of this democracy, voted for MMJ, what was DEA's agenda? To work with the (ha, ha) 'Justice' Department to draw up a scheme whereby doctors would have their DEA drug licenses stripped from them should they recommend MMJ. When Dr. Donald Abrams sought to obtain U of Miss ditchweed for his groundbreaking study in MMJ, the DEA sat on his request for years, doing everything in their power to obstruct the approval process. So much for assisting doctors in the objective pursuit of 'legitimate research'. If that doesn't come under the heading of 'hidden agendas', I don't know what does. (Fortunately, courtesy of some brave doctors slapping Officer Boot on his porcine snout with a rolled up but no less heavy First Amendment lawsuit, they backed off. This time.) Agendas. Asa may find out that 'his' own agency may have a hidden agenda in mind for him as well. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on August 21, 2001 at 08:34:22 PT |
Ouch! The LA Times is tough! At one point they actually called Hutchinson "progressive" - I bet that's a first! How did SoCal get to be so damn regressive -"conservative" - in the first place? Hollywood is such a better fit for San Fran than LA, what were THEY thinking? [ Post Comment ] |
Post Comment | |