U.S. To Study Spraying Risks in Colombia |
Posted by FoM on August 12, 2001 at 11:17:14 PT By Paul de la Garza and David Adams Source: St. Petersburg Times To silence critics of U.S.-sponsored aerial spraying in Colombia, the Bush administration is launching a study intended to bolster its claims that herbicides used in the program are safe. However, if the plant killers are shown to be harmful to people, the study could backfire, putting the drug war and billions of dollars in U.S. aid to Bogota in jeopardy. With help from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, the U.S. Embassy in Bogota is working with Colombia to set up a plan to evaluate the safety of the spraying program. The two federal agencies helped establish methodology for the study and will help oversee it once it gets under way. Snipped Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help |
Comment #6 posted by kaptinemo on August 13, 2001 at 08:55:49 PT:
|
If you go to the this link http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10495.shtml and read this over again: "Sources within the agency doubt that Whitman will support the proposal to study the effects of Roundup on civilians and the environment. An EPA spokesman acknowledged that Whitman's deputy administrator, Linda Fisher, is a former Monsanto vice president, but said the EPA has no role in the spraying." You have to wonder just how much Bush Cabinet members have invested in Monsanto (in "blind trust", of course... to prevent any possible 'conflict of interest'. Yeah, right!) for the putative Number Two at EPA (such a strategically placed position, don't you think? A fox couldn't do any better than this door to the proverbial henhouse.) They must be laughing their *sses off at Monsanto Corporate HQ; one of their own is riding herd on the only regulatory agency that could do them serious damage. Check and mate in one move. Pretty slick move, eh? I said it before in a previous comment: if anyone had any doubts as to the extent to which corporations are calling the shots in the Bush Too Administration, this should have cleared them up. Entertain any further doubts, and you are either a paid mouthpiece for them...or just plain stupid.
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #5 posted by Patrick on August 12, 2001 at 14:11:17 PT |
No credible study shows MJ use is harmful. Government position. Ban it. No "credible" study shows spraying Herbicide on people is harmful. Government position. Go ahead and use it. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #4 posted by dddd on August 12, 2001 at 13:27:40 PT |
......GREAT SCOTTT!!!!
.....??ASTONISHING!!!,,,,,, Here's my typical,expected,prediction,,,,,,The study will be carried .."Roundup is not for everyone.Do not use Roundup if you have a history of
[ Post Comment ] |
Comment #3 posted by mayan on August 12, 2001 at 12:35:04 PT |
It is ridiculous that we are just now going to study the effects of these chemicals after we have already sprayed thousands and thousands of acres!(& who knows how many people) This flawed policy is quite indicative of the arrogance & ignorace of the drug warriors. [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #2 posted by ekim on August 12, 2001 at 11:51:31 PT:
|
US: Transcript: Of Sanho Tree's Visit to NYT DPF Forum URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1477/a09.html Newshawk: Completely revised! See http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm Pubdate: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 Source: New York Times Drug Policy Forum Website: http://forums.nytimes.com/comment/index-national.html Note: This, and the series of forums, is being archived at MAP as an exception to our web only source posting policies. Transcript edited by forum participants and the New York Times. Note: Sanho Will Be Visiting The Drugsense Chat This Sun. Aug 12, 2001 8 Pm Eastern - 5 Pm Pacific - http://Www.drugsense.org/chat Future: guests in this series include George McMahon and Ann McCormick See http://www.cultural-baggage.com/schedule.htm for details. Related: http://www.usfumigation.org/NovPressConfSpeakers/SanhoTree/Sanho.htm [ Post Comment ] |
Comment #1 posted by ekim on August 12, 2001 at 11:48:30 PT:
|
sanho - Hi donaldway, I think the "collateral damage" from the drug war is a crucial point to include. As Kevin Zeese likes to say, the drug war is two degrees of separation from every major social problem confronting us today. I think when those "untouched" by the drug war realize how deep the impact goes, they will start to get involved. To mention but one example, birdwatchers are starting to get worked up over our war in Colombia because they are realizing that our aerial fumigation program is destroying the ecosystem of the country that has the most number of distinct bird species in the world. When the birdwatchers turn against the drug war, you know things are changing! [ Post Comment ] |
Post Comment | |