Cannabis News Cannabis TV
  Economist Pushes for Legalization of Narcotics
Posted by FoM on August 02, 2001 at 19:06:06 PT
By Bill Steigerwald  
Source: Tribune-Review 

justice Any $50-a-day crackhead can tell you why politicians of both major parties so blindly support America's War on (some) Drugs.

What is more perplexing/discouraging/frightening is why - in a purportedly free society - there is so little debate in our mainstream media about how and why our drug war is being fought after three decades of obvious failure.

It's a shame, not to mention a national disgrace, that no important American magazine - or newspaper, or TV channel, or cable channel talking head - has found the brains and the guts to do what Britain's Economist does on its cover this week - straightforwardly push for the legalization of drugs.

The venerable newsweekly, which counts nearly 500,000 subscribers to its American edition, has long been a brave, tireless and principled advocate of legalizing drugs such as marijuana, heroin and cocaine. As it demonstrates in its 15-page survey of the "drugs trade," the growing, selling, consuming and outlawing of illegal drugs around the world is a complex mix of economics, politics and world culture.

The Economist is not kidding itself about the down sides of illegal drugs or the bad people who traffic in them. It knows that if they are made legal, they'll become even cheaper and more available, and probably will be used and abused by more people, including kids.

It also knows drugs such as heroin and cocaine can hurt individuals and society and understands why they arouse the "moral fury" of segments of society, the way divorce and drinking alcohol still can.

But the Economist's argument for legalization rests equally on principle and practicality. As the magazine points out, basing a national drug policy on "moral outrage" - as America has done - is a terribly impractical idea.

Proof of that is America's War on (some) Drugs. It not only costs taxpayers about $40 billion a year, "it has eroded civil liberties, locked up unprecedented numbers of young blacks and Hispanics and corroded foreign policy." It has proved "a dismal rerun" of Prohibition, America's 13-year war against alcohol.

As for principle, the magazine refers all martini-drinking, nicotine-addicted anti-drug warriors to John Stuart Mill, the great British 19th century liberal.

Unlike today's morally meddlesome and selectively puritanical liberals and conservatives, Mill truly believed that free adult individuals should be in charge of their own minds and bodies and not the state - even if they are doing themselves harm by smoking reefer or bungee-jumping.

Despite such radical talk and its obvious biases, the Economist's package - as always - is reasoned, readable and rich with information. It doesn't pretend to have all the answers. And it's journalistically fair, whether it's tracking the steadily falling street price of a kilo of heroin ($290,000), explaining the more humane approach of Switzerland's heroin maintenance programs or urging America's politicians to move toward a policy that treats drug addiction as a health problem, not a criminal one.

The Economist's arguments against the idiocies and inequities of the drug war aren't new. Neither is its case for legalization or its call for maximum individual sovereignty.

Sadly, its package is especially valuable mainly because America's failed drug policy is so rarely debated.

Bill Steigerwald can be reached at: bsteigerwald@tribweb.com

Source: Tribune Review (PA)
Author: Bill Steigerwald
Published: Thursday, August 2, 2001
Copyright: 2001 Tribune-Review Publishing Co.
Website: http://triblive.com/
Contact: letters@tribune-review.com

Articles From The Economist UK:

History Has a Habit of Repeating Itself
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10423.shtml

How Governments Try and Fail To Stem Drugs
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10422.shtml

The Case For Legalisation Time for Puff of Sanity
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10421.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #1 posted by ekim on August 03, 2001 at 08:50:27 PT:

lTE
To:
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 11:15 AM
Subject: LTE-ECONOMIST PUSHES FOR LEGALIZATION OF NARCOTICS


> May I respectfully disagree with the idea that no well read publication
has
> put forward the Legalization of Drugs on its front cover. Iam looking at
my
> well worn issue of the National Review. February 12, 1996 which reads
> ---The War On Drugs Is Lost---. under which reads
> --Kill It
> --Go For Legalization
> -- Free Up Police, Courts
> -- Reduce Crime.
> under this comes these names.
> --Buckley
> --Nadelmann
> --Schmoke
> --Sweet
> --McNamera
> --Szasz
> --Duke
> May I suggest that these outstanding people be brought back together here
in
> Michigan for a debate on the drug issue today. Please see our ballot
> petition at www.prayes.com which would be the first state to allow three
> cannabis plants and three ozs to adults 21 and over. Thank you for reading
> this letter. Mike


[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 02, 2001 at 19:06:06