Cannabis News Media Awareness Project
  Seattle Police Crack Down on Medical-Pot Purveyor
Posted by FoM on August 01, 2001 at 09:41:36 PT
By Carol M. Ostrom, Seattle Times Staff Reporter 
Source: Seattle Times 

medical Last week, 77-year-old Ruby Seals felt good enough to come to the Green Cross Patient Co-op in person to pick up her marijuana. Before that, she was in a hospice, battling pancreatic cancer. But marijuana, she says, helped her turn around the pain and vomiting that caused her to lose more than 60 pounds.

This week, Seals won't be able to get the marijuana her doctor recommended. On Joanna McKee's West Seattle garage door is a big sign: "CLOSED." Beside it, she posted the "cease and desist" letter she received Friday from the Seattle Police Department.

McKee has been openly helping patients get marijuana for nearly a decade, providing what she calls "a community service" to help qualified patients avoid buying pot on the street.

Now, less than two months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that California cannabis clubs cannot legally distribute marijuana as a "medical necessity" for seriously ill patients, McKee must decide whether it's worth the risks to continue her mission.

She doesn't want to go to jail, but neither does she want to abandon 1,500 patients, many of whom she says desperately need the drug to control vomiting, nausea, tremors and other conditions for which prescription medications haven't worked.

Seals swears marijuana saved her life. "It's the only thing that helps me," she says. "It keeps me from throwing up, and it helps me to eat."

Although a state law passed by voters in 1998 allows patients with specified diseases to legally possess marijuana if they have permission from their doctor, so-called cannabis clubs and cooperatives such as Green Cross have been the subject of dispute for years. Police have long been suspicious that patients — and those who help them get marijuana, such as McKee — are simply drug users and suppliers.

Both the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and local federal prosecutors concede that state law doesn't protect organizations like Green Cross. "We've always had a pretty consistent discussion that what they're doing doesn't fit within the statute," says Dan Satterberg, spokesman for Prosecuting Attorney Norm Maleng.

At the same time, prosecutors have said they have no interest in hauling sick people into court. In most places around the country, obtaining convictions of patients or those who help them has been difficult.

The law says each patient can have one caregiver who can grow or supply marijuana, and each caregiver can have one patient at a time. McKee argues that could mean "one patient now, and one patient in one minute."

After the Supreme Court ruling, both state and federal prosecutors said nothing had changed. But in McKee's neighborhood, complaints to police from a block-watch group began mounting.

In June, McKee says, police began talking to Green Cross patients and asking McKee questions.

Police spokesman John Hayes says the Supreme Court decision clarified a gray area, and last week's letter simply explains the Police Department's current understanding of the limits of the law.

But the letter also warns of "arrest and prosecution" for having more than one patient.

Leo Poort, a department legal adviser, says it's clear the law doesn't protect a caregiver with more than one patient. He realizes that the law left unclear how patients who couldn't grow their own marijuana would obtain it, he said. But, he adds, "It's not fair to law enforcement to have a law passed by the people and not have it enforced as written."

Dr. Rob Killian, a Seattle family-practice doctor who was a major force behind Initiative 692, which allowed certain patients to legally use marijuana, believes police in Seattle and elsewhere around Puget Sound have recently stepped up busts of patients and suppliers.

"There seems to be something going on," he said. "I'm afraid, honestly. Where is this going? Is the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) going to go after doctors? Are they going to go after our licenses?"

Killian notes that police have long been skeptical about the legitimacy of using marijuana for medical reasons.

Last year, Seattle police produced a training video that depicts a hippie faker trying to take advantage of the medical-marijuana law. The video begins with a clean-cut officer politely knocking at the door of "Mr. Rumpwhistle," a dark-glasses-wearing "patient" in no apparent pain or discomfort, who spacily offers the officer a plate of brownies and produces a doctor's letter signed by "Dr. Timothy Leary," the infamous LSD proponent who died five years ago.

Hayes says the video wasn't intended to be disrespectful toward legitimate patients, but to help illustrate the types of situations officers can encounter, and to outline a protocol for collecting evidence, including letters from physicians to verify compliance with the law.

McKee maintains there is no other good way for some patients to get marijuana. McKee requires, as does the law, a signed statement from a patient's doctor and asks for a donation, but says she hasn't turned away those who can't pay.

"Is it better to have these people roaming the streets in their wheelchairs and getting mugged?" she asks.

Dr. Greg Carter, a Centralia rehabilitation-medicine specialist, e-mailed Seattle Mayor Paul Schell yesterday on Green Cross' behalf. He said he has recommended Green Cross to 30 or 40 patients, most with multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease), spinal-cord injuries or chronic pain.

Carter said Green Cross always checks the legitimacy of the doctor's letter and will deliver to homebound patients. "It would be a tragedy to lose that resource," Carter wrote.

Green Cross lawyers and police say they will continue to discuss Green Cross' situation. "If McKee is making a good-faith effort to comply with the law," says Poort, that will lessen the chance of investigation and prosecution.

Seals and other Green Cross patients hope a solution comes soon.

"I don't know what we'll do," she says. "We can't go out on the street and get it. That's the horrible part. It means taking life away from me, as far as I'm concerned.

"What are people like me going to do? Suffer until they die? That ain't right. I don't care what they think — it's wrong. They should give (marijuana) to people, people sick like me, people dying with cancer. What the police did is terrible. They need to learn where priorities lie."

Carol M. Ostrom can be reached at: costrom@seattletimes.com

Source: Seattle Times (WA)
Author: Carol M. Ostrom, Seattle Times Staff Reporter
Published: Wednesday, August 01, 2001
Copyright: 2001 The Seattle Times Company
Contact: opinion@seatimes.com
Website: http://www.seattletimes.com/

Related Article & Web Sites:

Green Cross Patients Co-op
http://www.hemp.net/greencross/

Washington State Initiative 692
http://www.eventure.com/i692/

Medicinal Cannabis Research Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/research.htm

Marijuana Co-op Closes After Warning by Police
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10488.shtml

CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #5 posted by Jah-nay G on August 03, 2001 at 03:03:45 PT:

US Gov is not your friend
What ever happened to government by the people, for the people? America claims to be the most progressive free place on the planet yet we watch other first world nations respond to citizens needs (i.e. Swede's and Germany's same sex marriage laws, Canadian, Brits and Dutch tolerance of Ganja etc.)as America increasingly alienates one group of citizens after another. Gay, ethnic, or ganja boosters we are all deviations from the accepted norm.
Need I remind anyone that it WAS a country founded by Puritan ideals and little has changed since 1620.
Our only attempt at advancement has been the elimination of Death By Fire in the Town Square for Heretics….. instead our current witch hunts have a modern version of fiscal immolation coded into law it's called property forfeiture.
I guess the question to all Americans is, when did Freedom become another word for law breaking, anti- government sociopath? The US autocracy is a machine that has no humane face at present.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by mayan on August 01, 2001 at 16:29:27 PT
RECKONING
I can't wait for the Drug War Crimes trials! I hope they are on CNN. If not, I'll have to get CourtTV.

It is truly frightening that humans can be so inhumane.

I would not want to be a drug warrior when the final day of reckoning arrives.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by how much longer on August 01, 2001 at 13:52:15 PT
Proud to be American!
Just another example of 'War On Drugs benefits':
Sick are denied relief.

Good job policy makers!


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Ethan Russo, MD on August 01, 2001 at 12:59:54 PT:

Shame
Joanna is a fine person who has selflessly attempted to help others. All the authorities achieve with such actions is to alienate the sick and dying, their family and friends. The end of prohibition will come sooner as a result.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by greenfox on August 01, 2001 at 10:53:19 PT
Not fair to law enforcement..?
Give me a break. This is just another excuse to jail the sick. It actually MAKES ME SICK to see it because even before the law was passed, people were getting jailed. Why weren't the police compassionate THEN? I'll tell you why.

FORFIETTED A$$ETS.... oh well...


sly in green, you know the scene,
-gf


[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 01, 2001 at 09:41:36