Cannabis News Stop the Drug War!
  Federal Crackdown on Students
Posted by FoM on July 29, 2001 at 07:44:54 PT
By Tanya Schevitz, Chronicle Staff Writer 
Source: San Francisco Chronicle  

justice When Marisa Garcia heard about a new law denying federal financial aid to students with drug convictions, she never thought that it would apply to her. She had just paid a $415 fine for a misdemeanor charge of possession after police found a pipe with some marijuana ashes in her car.

"I already got my fine and I paid my ticket. I thought everything was done, and then I found out I was going to be punished again," Garcia said.

Snipped


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #10 posted by Lehder on July 30, 2001 at 08:59:28 PT
I wasn't explicit enough
The fact that I only alluded to is this: Many Blacks believe that the government and the CIA in particular have brought heroin and crack specifically into the ghettos with the express purpose of addicting, demoralizing and killing Blacks. Many Blacks believe that heroin and crack are consciously used by the government as weapons of genocide. Is this true? I don't know and have not looked into it sufficiently. Certainly I am convinced that shadow elements of government are deeply involved in smuggling in order to finance secret programs of various kinds. Anyway, i think this belief caused many Blacks to target the drugs themselves as culprit; they want drugs out of their communities and so have often supported the war on drugs as a result - Jesse Jackson for one was for many years a vocal supporter of the war on drugs, but now favors decrim or legalization. That was my point.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by Lehder on July 30, 2001 at 08:34:49 PT
unlikely, kap - but...
The threats to freedom experienced by university students today are fairly mild compared to the those of the sixties. Certainly they're substantial and inexcusable, but for the most part, except for blatant street sales and parties that erupt into violence from alcohol, local cops turn a blind eye to drug use in university areas. This so-called crackdown, though, is an escalation that comes from the centers of federal power and has awakened some organized protest. Good.

But it's not like getting drafted. It's not like spending one's entire adolescence and high school years watching the bodies pile up every damn night first in b&w and then in color, and then having it go on and on through college and then, just as one wants to get a job and start a career to have his life disrupted for years by a military "obligation", or just as one wants to marry and begin a family to have her boyfriend torn away and shipped overseas for years over something as ugly as a useless war. But let them keep pushing and see what happpens.

I have higher hopes for minority groups organizing against the drug war, considering its strong racist element, and I think that much progress could be made for both sides by coalitions between anti-war and minority groups. Certainly the anti-prohibition groups need some friends. In some comments you have expressed incredulity and impatience with the failure of minority leaders to be more vocal and articulate about drug-war racism. The problem here, I think, is that Black leaders and people have made the oversight, which has so many manifestations, of confusing drugs with the drug war. Understandably so, too: for they, more than others have been victimized by the cultural and drug wars. They believe, and there's a lot of truth to it, that the ghettos have been targeted by the government for drug addiction, and in part this occurs also not by design but by happenstance that the poor are easier legal targets, easier for the police to victimize even though drug use among Blacks is equal to or lower than among Whites. My point is that it is easy to understand how the Black response has been more antagonistic to drugs themselves, a misdirection in my opinion, than to the war on drugs.

Whether it is well articulated or understood though, minority groups are becoming more discontent, and a weakening turn in the economy - as we are presently having - will ony exacerbate their discontent. Witness the riots in Cincinnatti - they're still going on, on and off now for months. And it is impossible not to notice, as began in Los Angeles some years ago, Whites rioting harmoniously alongside their black and brown brothers. While their complaints may not be well articulated, discontent is growing, and racism is only a part of it - it's the economy and the drug war too and the effects of the drug war on the economy and on the employment of peoples of all colors. I think everyone can gain if we communicate more with black leaders about these issues; at least it would be an interesting discussion.
My opinion and conjecture.


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by kaptinemo on July 30, 2001 at 05:13:21 PT:

Lehder, they might still wake up
But not through anything quite so ennobling as a sense of indignation at something so blatantly racist and unConstitutional.

More like self-defense.

I haven't been on a college campus in 20 years, so I can't say one way or another what the general disposition of today's students might be like. But force anyone into a corner, and sooner or later, they come out fighting. The campesinos in Colombia are doing so with their lawsuit to stop the spraying; push here and the students just might wake from their slumber long enough to organize.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by Lehder on July 30, 2001 at 03:23:20 PT
Forget the Universities
These are not the sixties. The university student these days is several years older than in the sixties. These are people who have jobs, who take drug tests and who are generally poorly informed. In the sixties the students were way ahead of the general population; they were informed about Vietnam and they led the fight against the government's propaganda campaigns.

Also, a large and rapidly growing number of students take their degrees via Internet classes. They are relatively isolated and not exposed to ideas outside their textbooks or to free-thinking people or alternate lifestyles.

Finally, today's students are dumb. The surge of baby boomers in the sixties allowed universities to be far more selective than they are today. At the University of New Mexico, famous for its multiple choice exams throughout the entire undergraduate course, only one in four incoming freshmen manages to graduate after six years.

In short, today's students are soft on war. Don't count on protests or any kind of organized or effective challenge to the drug war from our gelded and lobotomized universities.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by mayan on July 30, 2001 at 02:54:54 PT
Bush Still Blows
I liked that one too lookinside! The more I read about the shrub on the web, the more I realize that he and his family are scary folks!

Check this one out!
http://www.bk2k.com/bushbodycount/bodies.html


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by SWAMPIE on July 29, 2001 at 19:59:05 PT
DOUBLE-PUNISHMENT
Isn't there a constitutional amendment against being punished twice for the same"crime"????What about losing your drivers license too?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by lookinside on July 29, 2001 at 14:16:25 PT:

thanks, mayan...
just sent something to EVERYONE on my email list...i wonder
how my (republican) congressman and assemblyman will take it?


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by FoM on July 29, 2001 at 13:10:55 PT
My 2 cents
There's something I've thought about more then once. I don't know anything about Cocaine except that just thinking that Bush used Coke doesn't sound like much of a compliment to Cocaine.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by mayan on July 29, 2001 at 13:08:01 PT
Bush Blows
If you want to protest & piss of the Prez, visit -

http://www.justsayblow.com

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by lookinside on July 29, 2001 at 12:26:29 PT:

racist...
this law is poorly written...even the author has said
so...of course the "shrub" would run with it...it allows him
to abuse segments of the population that he can't relate
to...the poor, the non-white, and the young...(his
relationship with his daughters seems to be less than perfect)

i hope rep. frank can push this through...but it will take
many, many letters from irate citizens to help...


[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on July 29, 2001 at 07:44:54