Cannabis News DrugSense
  Libel Suit Raises Questions About Accountability
Posted by FoM on July 23, 2001 at 21:40:29 PT
By Warren Richey, Staff Writer of The CSM 
Source: Christian Science Monitor  

justice Four years ago, veteran journalist Al Giordano moved for security reasons to an undisclosed location in Mexico to write firsthand on the drug war. Last Friday, he found himself in a small, crowded courtroom in New York facing defamation charges filed by Banco Nacional de Mexico, also known as Banamex.

From Mr. Giordano's perspective, this is a new front line in the fight against powerful drug traffickers. From the bank's perspective, it's a question of maintaining integrity.

Either way, Internet and legal scholars say it is a potentially precedent-setting case that raises fundamental questions about free speech in the globalized world of cyberspace, as well as the role of the independent journalists in a media world increasingly controlled by corporate giants.

"The case ... presents two issues that will play a key role in determining the viability of online, independent journalism," according to Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of Giordano et al. "One is the ability of foreign plaintiffs to forum shop abusively, subjecting online, independent journalists to foreign laws ... and two, is the freedom of online journalists to republish articles on the Internet from publications in the offline realm without unreasonably being subjected to liability."

Giordano's alleged offenses occurred at a Columbia Law School forum, in two press interviews (one with The Village Voice), and on his website. What he did was repeat allegations that the head of Mexico's most powerful bank was involved with narco-trafficking and money laundering. His statements were based on stories about cocaine trafficking written by Mario Menendez, a Mexican journalist.

Banamex is also suing Mr. Menendez in New York. Three similar defamation cases brought by the bank against him in Mexico were dismissed.

"This is a harassment suit, this is a slap suit. They cannot win this suit," said Giordano outside the State Supreme Court building. "They only hope to drag it on and on to stop me and Mario Menendez from reporting on the truth of the corrupt drug war."

The bank's attorney says the cases in Mexico were dismissed on a technicality and that the substance of the allegations against Banamex's CEO Roberto Hernandez are untrue.

"Banamex is a largely privately owned bank that does millions of dollars of business in New York," Banamex's attorney Tom McLish told the judge last week. "Mr. Menendez and Giordano came to New York specifically to defame Banamex by claiming its chairman is a narco-trafficker and money launderer."

Mr. McLish, of the Washington law firm Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld, said the allegations make the Banamex chairman vulnerable to charges he violated the federal "drug kingpin law," and his assets in the US could be frozen and seized.

Menendez and Giordano, who researched the story independently, stand by their assertions about the Banamex chairman. Last Friday, they asked the court to dismiss all charges.

Giordano, an investigative journalist who used to work for The Boston Phoenix, moved to Mexico to expose what he believes is the complicity between some legitimate businesses and government officials and the drug traffickers. "You know the movie 'Traffic'?" he says. "I live that every day."

Giordano's website, Narconews.com, is also being sued, because it posted a translated version of one of Menendez's stories on the Banamex chairman. The lawyer who represents the site contends it is inappropriate for the Mexican bank to bring charges in New York.

"This site emanates from Mexico," says attorney Tom Lesser. "It has nothing to do with New York. Its focus is the drug war, the ramifications of the drug war, and politics in Latin America."

Banamex attorney McLish says New York is the appropriate venue, because statements were made here and Narconews.com is registered to a post-office box in New York. "It would make no sense to sue somewhere else for false statements they were made in New York to New York audiences," says McLish.

But Giordano, who is representing himself, says the statements made in New York were "protected opinions" based on specific facts. The website, in addition, is registered here only to protect his safety. He insists that Banamex is suing in New York only because it failed in its attempts to discredit the stories in Mexico.

"If the National Bank of Mexico can sue journalists in Mexico for telling the truth, there are 1.4 billion websites on this planet earth that can be dragged into New York, the most expensive court jurisdiction and the most backlogged in the world," he says. "That would have a chilling effect."

Note: A Mexican bank sues a journalist who is reporting on the drug war for statements on the bank's chief.

Complete Title: Libel Suit Raises Questions About Accountability Online

Source: Christian Science Monitor (US)
Author: Warren Richey, Staff Writer of The CSM
Published: Tuesday, July 24, 2001
Copyright: 2001 The Christian Science Publishing Society
Contact: oped@csps.com
Website: http://www.csmonitor.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Narco News
http://www.narconews.com/

Drug War on the Web
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10157.shtml

Libel Suit Threatens Future Of Publication
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9263.shtml

Lawyers, Drugs and Money
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread8097.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #2 posted by mayan on July 24, 2001 at 17:11:41 PT
Enjoy Now!
Enjoy the internet as we know it while you can.

The truth is here & the powers that be don't want us to know the truth.

We must never relinquish this medium of communicatioin & information!

Hope lies herein.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Doug on July 24, 2001 at 09:45:38 PT
This is important
NarcoNews is a very good source of information about the War on Drugs south of the border. This is a blatant attempt to close it down, because it gets at the truth. The statement that the previous cases concerning the Bank were thrown out on a technicality are extremely one-sided, but that is to be expected. It's a pity that the journalist in question didn't probe a little deeper into this.

[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on July 23, 2001 at 21:40:29