Cannabis News NORML - Working to Reform Marijuana Laws
  U.S. Presence Grows in Andes
Posted by FoM on July 10, 2001 at 17:04:24 PT
Strafor Global Intelligence Update 
Source: WorldNetDaily 

justice The rebel conflict in Colombia is escalating, as insurgents have responded with some of their heaviest resistance to date to the U.S.-supported Plan Colombia counter-drug offensive. U.S. military and civilian personnel have become a primary target for the increasingly aggressive guerrillas, who have threatened retaliation against the United States inside and outside Colombia.

The United States, the largest supporter of Colombia's war on drugs, has sought to avoid getting dragged into the country's civil war, making a clear distinction between counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency operations.

Part of this distinction includes limiting the number of U.S. military personnel and contractors operating in Colombia to 500 and 300 respectively.

But a study of the American presence in the Andean region shows that the United States is helping fight the drug war – and indirectly the civil war – in Colombia by sending more and more U.S. personnel there. A new military base in Ecuador will host 400 U.S. military personnel later this year. Military personnel are augmented by an unusual assortment of U.S. government civilians, including people from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.

Civilian contractors are also helping to build up the American presence in the region. A contract belonging to one contractor, Dyncorp, indicates that the company is not only flying drug eradication missions in Colombia on behalf of the U.S. government, but is increasingly being used by Washington in other roles elsewhere in the region. The flow of U.S. personnel – in uniforms and otherwise – indicates that aid alone is not helping the Colombian government so far. And the higher profile poses risks to U.S. personnel.

The U.S. military is training three new counter-narcotics battalions in the Colombian army and outfitting their security services with hundreds of millions of dollars in aircraft and equipment. It also advises, plans and in some cases participates in dangerous counter-drug operations throughout the coca-rich and rebel-infested Putumayo state in southern Colombia.

The United States has also recently constructed a forward operating location across the border from Colombia in Ecuador. Eloy Alfaro Airport in Manta, Ecuador, will be the primary forward operating location for a variety of surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft and will hold an estimated 400 U.S. soldiers. The buildup comes as Ecuador is seeking assistance from the United States, European Union and Japan to help prevent a spillover of Colombia's conflict, the BBC reported June 15.

Along with the increase in military assistance and presence of U.S. soldiers, there has been a parallel rise in the number of other U.S. government, contractor and civilian personnel in Colombia and neighboring countries. The number is fast approaching the U.S.-set limit, with Congress likely to be given a proposal extending those limits. The rebels are unlikely to differentiate between military and non-military targets.

For instance, Washington increasingly relies on ex-soldiers in the employ of defense contracting firms such as Dyncorp, Military Professional Resources Inc. and Virginia Electronics. In Colombia, Dyncorp carries out fumigation against coca crops, drug interdiction, transport, reconnaissance, and search-and-rescue missions, among other operations, according to a copy of a recent $600 million contract it was awarded by the U.S. State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.

According to the contract documents, Dyncorp personnel either have or will operate at various locations, many of them in or near Colombia's primary battle zones. Outside hires are spread throughout the countryside at main operating bases and forward operating locations where anti-drug efforts emanate. The planned delivery of nine new T-65 spraying aircraft in 2001 and 2002 is likely to increase such contractor support, at least in the short term.

A heavy firefight Feb. 18 near the town of Curillo in southern Colombia illustrates the extent of the U.S. contractors' involvement in the country's rebel war. A group of four crop-spraying planes, all piloted by U.S. personnel, and six helicopters, three of which were also piloted by Americans, were fired on by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, and one of the helicopters was forced to land.

U.S. personnel carrying M-16 assault rifles were on the ground as long as 10 minutes and exchanged fire with rebel forces, the Miami Herald reported. Mixed Colombian-U.S. crews are commonplace, and such run-ins with guerilla forces are on the rise.

The U.S. presence in the Andean region extends beyond military and State Department contractor personnel. The Defense Department, Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Customs Service, Internal Revenue Service, United States Information Agency and even the Bureau of Prisons are all increasing their involvement in Colombia and elsewhere in the region.

For example, the DEA now develops "numerous major [drug] cases" with the assistance of its Special Operations Division, a multi-agency effort that targets the communications of Colombia-based trafficking groups, according to agency documents. The DEA also operates sensitive investigation units in Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and Brazil and soon will create one in Ecuador.

The Customs Service trains law enforcement personnel in Colombia and seven other countries, and an increasing number of customs agents are expected to be detailed to DEA operations in the region, according to recent testimony to the U.S. Congress. A small number of Department of Defense contractors have also posted 29 personnel in Colombia to support remote radar installations, force protection and counter-drug operations.

The business sector also provides the rebels with more potential U.S targets, as American investment in Colombia is thriving.

With that rise in investment comes heightened risk to American citizens. U.S. assets such as rail cars owned by coal miner Drummond and an oil pipeline co-owned by Occidental Petroleum Corp. are being attacked with greater frequency.

U.S. policymakers are becoming concerned that the United States, by putting itself in a situation in which Americans are attacked, could become embroiled in Colombia's civil war. A current proposal in the House of Representatives would prohibit U.S. funds from being used to contract with private military companies, although it is not likely to be passed.

The risk to Americans has grown considerably now that a new and even deadlier phase in Colombia's war-torn history is emerging. In what was apparently the heaviest-known rebel resistance to the U.S.-backed counter-drug offensive, at least 30 Colombian soldiers and 26 rebels were killed June 22 in clashes that broke out at an army base near the riverside town of Puerto Leguizamo, the Associated Press reported.

Meanwhile, insurgent groups such as the FARC and National Liberation Army are sharpening their hostage-taking skills and relying more on bombings in urban areas. The kidnapping of 207 people by the FARC May 18 is believed to be the largest incident of hostage-taking on record, according to the British Medical Journal. And the recent approval of a prisoner-exchange agreement between the government and the FARC – as well as proposals for granting a demilitarized zone to the National Liberation Army – raises the risk of a violent reaction by independent paramilitary groups, the Economist's Intelligence Unit warned on June 22.

Against this backdrop, the U.S. counter-drug strategy shows signs of failing. In a recent unpublished study for the U.S. Air Force, the Rand Corp. warned that fighting drugs while ignoring the civil war is futile because the guerillas, backed by unlimited drug money, are taking over Colombia. The presence of Americans in such large numbers indicates that aid alone is insufficient to boost the government in its efforts against drugs and leftist guerrillas.

Editor's note: In partnership with Stratfor, the global intelligence company, WorldNetDaily publishes daily updates on international affairs provided by the respected private research and analysis firm. Look for fresh updates each afternoon, Monday through Friday.

Note: The growing drug war in Colombia.

Source: WorldNetDaily (US Web)
Published: Tuesday, July 10, 2001
Copyright: 2001, WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Contact: letters@worldnetdaily.com
Website: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Colombia Drug War News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/colombia.htm

DynCorp's Drug Problem
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10211.shtml

U.S. Anti-Drug Strategy Stalls in the Andes
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10121.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #19 posted by dddd on July 11, 2001 at 06:04:59 PT
much appreciated
Thanx for the inside tips Lehder.I'll put on my Polite Prozaced Simpleton
demeanor at first.......but when the deliberations get going,I will give the
other eleven an experience they will not soon forget.....like I say though,,,

,,,with my luck,,,it will be a trial about whether or not Johnson Construction
was responsible for disturbing the habitat of the obscure Newport Tufted Spotty
Warbling Goat Snail,,when a wheelbarrow full of dirt was dumped into the
sensitive wetland marsh that this shy creature inhabits....dddd


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by meagain on July 11, 2001 at 05:56:18 PT
My 2 cents
CongressmanSuet in reply before I found these websites and started finding out what was REALLY happening I was one of those people who wanted to burn the flag and defect to Amsterdam now I know Freedom is only a few states away...moving closer every second.Furthermore I never knew 20 miles from me possesion of up to 100 grams is only a $100 fine here in my state it is jail time for any amount.

WE will win in the end.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by Lehder on July 11, 2001 at 05:45:28 PT
the call of duty
i have read, somewhere, that foremen are so selected because they 1) keep fairly quiet during the initial discussions prior to election of the foreman 2) say little or nothing of substance during the initial discussion beyond a couple of friendly and vacuous comments and have no opinions of their own 3) near the end of the initial discussion speak to give what amounts to a summary of what others have said paying due respect to each person's comments and pretending that all of these opinions are of value and that together they comprise a treasure of resources that provide the foundation for the noblest of deliberations to come.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by dddd on July 11, 2001 at 05:20:35 PT
Pretend to be normal
.......I assure you,I will be most prudently misleading when
interviewed by whoever is interviewing.....but I will not
hesitate to be contraversial,and difficult when push comes
to shove in the deliberations.......who knows,if I play my
cards right,,,I may end up as the foreman of the jury......
.....and the case will probably be about some really bad
traffic ticket or highly advanced divorce ?..or something........


............................dddd


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by Lehder on July 11, 2001 at 04:42:20 PT
A Miracle has occurred....
dddd called for jury duty. Be smart, be good, be careful:

http://www.nguworld.com/vindex/97/021297vs.htm



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by jacksplace58 on July 11, 2001 at 03:29:26 PT
body count
from the article here the score from the Feb battle was army 30 rebels 26,..but the army could only produce 6 bodies,..
If I remember right we used the same math process in the nam too,. It's what the republicans call fuzzy math.
People who can't count shouldn't run wars it's self defeating.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #13 posted by dddd on July 11, 2001 at 00:22:37 PT
the ponytail stays CS
..Yes,,it is true that the internet opens up new vistas for
broadening ones perspectives,,,,,but back when I got the
first ,return to sender,jury summons,,,I was playing in a
band,doing 2 or 3 shows a week in LA,,plus working a full
40 hour a week job...I would get home from a gig at 2 A.M.
and get up at 6 and go to work.The thought of serving on some
prissy jury for 15 bucks a day was not something that I wanted
to work into my schedule,,,,,,,,nowdays,,I have a quite flexible
schedule,being self employed,,,I welcome the thought of going
through the experience of toying with this obscure call to civic
duty........I expect to be screened out of the jury pool immediatley,,
but that part of the challenge,,to see if I can pass as one of the
"peers"that jurys are supposed to consist of.

dddd

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by CongressmanSuet on July 10, 2001 at 23:51:24 PT
dddd, true heroism requires REAL sacrifice..

From "Return to Sender, that address unknown" to, I will do my best to get on, my, what a change there dddd. Could the Internet and Cannabisnews.com have had any influence in your new attitude towards "public service"? Think about it. The Internet is the last hope we have.People, 10 years ago, were any of you[ not to include a few posters here who have been doing work in this areaa for longer than that] as cogniscient of the War onDrugs? I have been online 7 years, and if it werent fot the Internet, I probably would have gone on as a nice sheep. a sheep with a very limited view of my surroundings. Think about it dddd, the ONLY news we would get would be from TV., and we all know how biased and bought that is. We would have just gone on buying buds, not realizing what was going on, hey we wouldnt have known about Jury Nullification. So, if you have a chance to make a difference, dont you think you might want to do the ultimate sacrifice and chop off that annoying ponytail? LOL...Only kidding, dont get your bowels in a roar! And hey, no need to do a "Patrick Henry"


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #11 posted by lookinside on July 10, 2001 at 21:57:34 PT:

exhaustion...
sorry rambler..i'm writing with brain disconnected...the
name of our greatest ally was an error as a title...just
assume i'm as confused as i appear...


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by lookinside on July 10, 2001 at 21:55:22 PT:

@#%%#%^%#^#^$$!#!$^&**..uh, i agree dddd...
i guess i need to learn to cuss in chinese and arabic to
cover my feelings on that second link...i hope the senate
spends a few years fighting over those bills...

we need more prisons...we need ALOT more prisons...how many
anti's are there? several million at least...at 4-5 to a
cell, we still need MORE prisons...


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by Rambler on July 10, 2001 at 21:52:32 PT
lookinside
I gotta admit,I'm sorta confused?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by lookinside on July 10, 2001 at 21:45:39 PT:

frances...
7 years ago i was seeing a psychologist...when i got a jury
summons, i asked her to write me a note...

as i recall she said something about my aggressive
tendencies and approval of the death penalty...

hmmm..seems like it's been about 7 years since i've heard
from those folks...


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by dddd on July 10, 2001 at 21:45:26 PT
linkz
Here's a couple of items.

This one,is some AP propaganda

http://www.newsday.com/ap/text/topnews/ap335.htm

And this one,is really #%*&@%#$

http://www.newsday.com/ap/text/topnews/ap226.htm


dddd


[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by dddd on July 10, 2001 at 21:07:50 PT
yer darn right
...If they start asking me my opinions on things,I'm going
to give them nebulous,unclear,and misleading replies.I'm
actually looking forward to it,,,,I'll dig my ill fitting suit
out of the bottom of my suitcase,,,tie my hair back,and
pretend I'm normal,,,,,,,maybe I'll get lucky,and it will
be some kind of O.J. type trial,and I can retire comfortably
by writing some cheap trashy book....
I'll be lucky to afford lunch and gas on the 15 bucks a day
they pay you...that's silly...........years ago I got a summons
for jury duty,and I returned to sender,saying I no longer
lived there.......

....dddd

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by kaptinemo on July 10, 2001 at 19:29:39 PT:

4D, that's really rich
Jury duty. Hopefully, in a drug case. That's real knee-slapper!

If they ask you about how you feel about Fully-Informed Juries or cannabis (I can just imagine them querying an old hippie these things and striving mightily to keep a straight face) just profess ignorance. "I don't know what to think". They love sheepletalk like that.

Then get in and throw a shoe in the works. Serve them right!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Dave in Florida on July 10, 2001 at 19:18:00 PT
Yea, right
DDDD said .. On a lighter note,I got a summons for jury duty today.I am hoping it will be a drug related trial.I wont know till next month.

Yea, I got one last week.. I report on the 18th


In a recent unpublished study for the U.S. Air Force, the Rand Corp. warned that fighting drugs while ignoring the civil war is futile because the guerillas, backed by unlimited drug money, are taking over Colombia.

They didn't publish it because it didn't say what they wanted! Could it Be?

Dave

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by dddd on July 10, 2001 at 18:53:17 PT
like I always say
Where are the 60 Minutes,and Dateline,or Nightline reports
on Colombia.It's becoming more and more obvious that the
media is being controlled and supressed BIGTIME!

Amerika....GUILTY!...of crimes against humanity.....

GUILTY,,of suppression and control of the national media.

GUILTY,,,of deceiving their own people.

The most notorious criminals,are the people behind this shit.

On a lighter note,I got a summons for jury duty today.I am hoping
it will be a drug related trial.I wont know till next month.

dddd

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by rabblerouser on July 10, 2001 at 18:40:40 PT
battle for resources
Coal, oil, land, renewable resources are what the US is
seeking. Fighting drugs is done for practice.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by kaptinemo on July 10, 2001 at 18:31:20 PT:

"Making a clear distinction"
"The United States, the largest supporter of Colombia's war on drugs, has sought to avoid getting dragged into the country's civil war, making a clear distinction between counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency operations."

Oh, now, this is really convincing...not!

The 'fumigation' (isn't that what you do to bugs - not people?) has been almost entirely on terrain held by the Rebels.

I'm sure this...'distinction'...has not been lost upon them.

American fixed and rotary-wing aircraft violating the territory effectively ceded to the Rebels by government forces. American mercenary contractors spraying American produced toxins from American-built Thrush Commander aircraft - and occasionally, firing American bought bullets - on the locals. Directed by more American military aircraft orbiting overhead.

Do you honestly believe that the Rebels (unlike the US government that so facetiously states otherwise) thinks of the 'contractors' as anything but US government forces?

This sham will end when some of the contractors are caught by the Rebels and paraded before international news services and questioned as to the level of their involvement. Just as the Hasenfuss incident (during the Iran/Contra conspiracy, a 'government contractor' - free translation: merc - was captured by the Sandinistas and admitted he was a CIA asset) which brought Ollie North's little "enterprise" to the public's eyes, this would remove any doubt in the American electorate's minds as to the extant of our involvement down there. An involvement that has already cost the lives of 5 good soldiers...for no good reason.

I don't wish any harm on anyone, but this madness has to stop...and usually that requires a few more people die in the process, before enough people are asking the right questions.

And as this article points out, with more US personnel on the ground there now than ever before, those questions had better be asked, and quick.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on July 10, 2001 at 17:04:24