Cannabis News Marijuana Policy Project
  State Tightens Marijuana Policies
Posted by FoM on June 13, 2001 at 20:24:25 PT
By Tim Christie, The Register-Guard 
Source: Register-Guard 

medical Last month, after discovering that three medical marijuana cards had been obtained with the forged signature of a physician, state officials decided to take a closer look at how Oregon's ground-breaking medical marijuana program was being managed. They didn't like what they found.

The Health Division program wasn't following its own rules for verifying applications, had a huge backlog of applications, and no procedures were in place for rejecting incomplete applications.

As a result, state officials have instituted new procedures for issuing cards and reassigned, at least temporarily, the woman who has run the program since its inception two years ago.

Although the program has been understaffed, that's not an excuse for not following procedures, said Bob Mink, director of the state Department of Human Services.

"I want all the programs we administer to be well managed. These high-profile programs I want to be particularly well managed," he said Tuesday. "We have the procedures in place. All we have to do is follow our procedures."

The state found itself thrust into the medical marijuana business after voters approved a ballot measure in 1998 that permitted people with certain medical conditions to use marijuana with their doctor's approval.

The state Health Division was charged with making the new law work and established a registry of medical marijuana patients. After filling out an application, providing a copy of their medical chart or having their doctor sign a form, and paying a $150 annual fee, patients receive a laminated, wallet-sized card and are exempted from the state's marijuana laws. Several other states have since followed Oregon's model.

In one sense, the program has been very successful. The number of patients has grown at a rapid clip - about 2,200 patients are now in the registry - and relatively few problems have been reported between patients and law enforcement officials.

But problems surfaced in February when a staff member noticed that the handwriting of a doctor's signature on a patient's application did not match the doctor's on-file signature. The staff member called the doctor, who said he never signed a request for that patient.

After further investigation, two more cards were suspended and four other applications were rejected for the same reason. All seven forged the same doctor's signature.

The law requires Health Division staff to verify the signature of a doctor either with a phone call or a letter. But the doctor whose signature was forged had previously asked Health Division staff not to call for verification unless the signatures didn't match his previous ones. As a result, the staff stopped confirming the doctor's signature by phone.

The internal audit also found:

The program staff kept no written records of the verifications it did make.

The program received little oversight, had inadequate support staff, and few management controls.

The program regularly failed to meet its own 30-day deadline for processing applications, had no procedure for denying incomplete applications, and doesn't compare registrations against death records.

Registration materials didn't explain patients were required to report name and address changes.

New procedures have now been put in place. Staff will now verify all applications by mail and keep a written record of verifications. Management responsibilities will be established, formal reporting mechanisms will be set up and permanent support staff will be hired.

The new interim manager, Chris Campbell, hopes to catch up on the backlog of 780 applications in a month's time, Mink said.

Kelly Paige, who has managed the program since its inception in 1998, has been temporarily reassigned to another job in the Health Division, as is the practice during an internal management investigation.

She'll continue to work for the Health Division, Mink said, but he wouldn't say if she'll get her old job back.

As for the forged applications, Oregon State Police are investigating, but state officials would say little else about the case. Spokesmen for the state police and Department of Human Services declined to discuss the investigation or say where the forged signatures originated.

"It's confidential medical information," said Human Services spokesman Mac Prichard.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Register-Guard, The (OR)
Author: Tim Christie, The Register-Guard
Published: June 13, 2001
Copyright: 2001 The Register-Guard
Contact: rgletters@guardnet.com
Website: http://www.registerguard.com/

To learn more:

Information about Oregon’s Medical Marijuana Act is available from the Oregon Health Division at (503) 731-4011, Ext. 640 and from the Stormy Ray Foundation at (866) 278-6769.

Stormy Ray Foundation Web site: http://www.stormyray.org/

Oregon Department of Human Services Web site: http://www.hr.state.or.us/

Related Articles:

Medical Marijuana Program Manager Dismissed
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10033.shtml

Audit: Pot Program Failed To Follow Its Own Rules
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread10029.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on June 13, 2001 at 20:24:25