Cannabis News The November Coalition
  The Chill Factor
Posted by FoM on June 13, 2001 at 13:32:22 PT
By Steve Robles 
Source: San Francisco Bay Guardian  

medical Although last month's Supreme Court ruling against the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative was relatively narrow in scope, the threat of more crackdowns has driven some northern California medical marijuana providers to scale back their operations, and at least one club has closed.

Just days after the ruling, which upheld a federal injunction against the Oakland club's distribution of marijuana, came down May 14, the Howard Street Harm Reduction Center closed its doors permanently.

And at one of San Francisco's most established providers of medical cannabis, Californians Helping Alleviate Medical Problems, all but one of the dispensary's board of directors resigned on the advice of the club's attorney. Further, CHAMP has placed what it calls a "temporary and indefinite" cap on new membership requests.

"We will continue to offer our services to the community," CHAMP's voice mail greeting proclaims, "but sadly, we are unable to take new members until further notice." Nobody at either the now-defunct HSHRC or CHAMP would return the Bay Guardian's phone calls.

In fact, none of the major medical marijuana dispensaries in San Francisco seemed to want to discuss the state of their operations with us. A spokesperson at one provider, who declined to be identified, stated that the club had been instructed by its attorneys not to speak to the media.

"It's terrible," San Francisco district attorney Terence Hallinan, who has supported the local dispensaries, told us. "There are about 2,000 people who could be affected by these two clubs' interruption in service, and I don't want to see these sick patients having to go to Dolores Park or wherever to try to get their medicine."

Hallinan said that he believes the clubs' actions have been "a bit premature" but that he understands the gravity of their decisions and is concerned about a domino effect.

"The ruling is absolutely having a chilling effect," he said. "Look, people aren't very excited about facing the prospect of mandatory minimum jail sentences here," Hallinan said.

Still, some legal observers say it's highly unlikely, with the OCBC case still waiting to be remanded to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals 30 days after the date of the ruling (in accordance to Supreme Court practice), that any further injunctions would come down soon, if at all.

"It's paranoia, plain and simple," the club staffer told us. "This ruling has nothing to do with Prop. 215 or the issue of medical marijuana at large. It's important that we, as providers, remember that."

Note: Court ruling causes cutbacks at local pot clubs.

E-mail Steve Robles at: stever@sfbg.com

Source: San Francisco Bay Guardian (CA)
Author: Steve Robles
Published: June 13, 2001
Copyright: 2001 San Francisco Bay Guardian
Contact: letters@sfbg.com
Website: http://www.sfbg.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

OCBC Versus The U.S. Government News
http://freedomtoexhale.com/mj.htm

Medicinal Cannabis Research Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/research.htm

The Hempire Strikes Back
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9983.shtml

Capitol Hill's Cannabis Catch-Up?
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9984.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on June 13, 2001 at 13:32:22